HHAYD Posted October 8, 2010 Report Share Posted October 8, 2010 (edited) EDIT: Never mind Edited October 8, 2010 by HHAYD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subtleknifewielder Posted October 8, 2010 Report Share Posted October 8, 2010 [quote name='Karl Martin' timestamp='1286540449' post='2478775'] I shall be ignoring any and all rulings that the GMs or the Mod that attempts to stop me from RPing what I have done. The GM court is supposed to be a place where conflicts between players are supposed to be addressed, not some sort of American court where even the bystanders start filing suits when the actual parties involved have already solved the problem. DotCom has kept his manners when he first asked me for a closed war. His behavior has been very different from the likes of good-for-nothing trolls like Zoot or Tidy Bowl Man, which is why I accepted his request. Since this is a closed RP, no one else should have a say on whatever I do unless dotCom is the one bringing up the issue. I hope the GMs and the Mods sees sense in denying TBM's filing. [/quote] This is not a ruling on the current situation, but the GM's have decided in the past, due to request by players for a more concrete number, to limit the number of armored vehicles (other than tanks) you can have to the same total number as the tanks you can have. This includes IFV's, APC's, mobile artillery, etc. Sorry if it sounds like a ruling, but TBM's post reminded me we had yet to make it public. However, since you agreed with dotcom on this war, and as long as it remains closed and completely mutually consentual...use what you like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sargun II Posted October 9, 2010 Author Report Share Posted October 9, 2010 (edited) @tidy: If the two combatants both agree on numbers, then I will not change them. As it is, unless he is doing something against the laws of physics that doesn't involve pulling numbers out of nowhere (which he is allowed to do as long as the other party consents) then he is free to do it. However, in the event of a non-planned war then he would have to severely edit his numbers. Edited October 9, 2010 by Sargun Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Enema Posted October 9, 2010 Report Share Posted October 9, 2010 Sargun, standing up for truth, justice, and the American way as usual. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lestari Posted October 9, 2010 Report Share Posted October 9, 2010 I don't want to mess with the continuity of the RP or whatever, but I do admit that 500 V-2s is a bit much. Karl Martin, would you mind lowering it to somewhere around 150-200? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karl Martin Posted October 9, 2010 Report Share Posted October 9, 2010 I'll just say I ran out of fuel to launch 300 of them. Better that way since I have another war coming right after yours. Now, respond to my attack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zoot Zoot Posted October 9, 2010 Report Share Posted October 9, 2010 Im contesting King Timmys nuclear attack on the grounds of OOC motivation. I am requesting that the GM's wipe the attack for this reason. Here is my screenshot evidence of a PM conversation with KT. [IMG]http://i211.photobucket.com/albums/bb144/zoot_zoot/1.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://i211.photobucket.com/albums/bb144/zoot_zoot/2.jpg[/IMG] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Timmy Posted October 9, 2010 Report Share Posted October 9, 2010 (edited) [URL=http://img692.imageshack.us/i/response.png/][IMG]http://img692.imageshack.us/img692/586/response.th.png[/IMG][/URL] He seemed up for it yesterday. And that is my first and main reson for this attack. I only told him all that other stuff cause he started crying in the Pms an I thought I better give him some sort of reason. Edited October 9, 2010 by KingTimmy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zoot Zoot Posted October 9, 2010 Report Share Posted October 9, 2010 "Im drunk so not posting ICly, but I will destroy you" Can mean alot of things, for starters, I was plastered and I was on IRC briefly before I went to bed so its well known I was wasted. Secondly, it could mean destroy you as in "Im going to destroy your plans" et cetera. The fact is KT, you admitted OOC motivation in nuking me. Because when I was RPing the Falklands, I sent spies in. So your also doing it because of the actions of a Nation im no longer RPing as. I quote: [b]"Ever since you spent spies in I have been thinking of what I could do to you"[/b] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sargun II Posted October 9, 2010 Author Report Share Posted October 9, 2010 Nuclear attack wiped on the basis of pure OOC motivation. Sorry, Timmy, but we can't know what your first motivation was - and your admission seals the deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Timmy Posted October 9, 2010 Report Share Posted October 9, 2010 If it means "Im going to destroy your plans", why didn't you say "Im going to destroy your plans" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zoot Zoot Posted October 9, 2010 Report Share Posted October 9, 2010 Once more, the new GM's proove to be worth their weight in gold. Thanks Sargun for clearing it up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Executive Minister Posted October 9, 2010 Report Share Posted October 9, 2010 Yep, seconding Sargun's ruling. The Falklands and England in CNRP are two very different entities... you have no motivation outside of OOC feelings behind this attack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Timmy Posted October 9, 2010 Report Share Posted October 9, 2010 (edited) So if there is no reason for an attack that's fine but if there is a hint of OOC reasoning, it's not? I didn't know there was a problem with OOC things, must have missed that bit in the rules Edited October 9, 2010 by KingTimmy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Executive Minister Posted October 9, 2010 Report Share Posted October 9, 2010 [quote name='KingTimmy' timestamp='1286641517' post='2479708'] So if there is no reason for an attack that's fine but if there is a hint of OOC reasoning, it's not? I didn't know there was a problem with OOC things, must have missed that bit in the rules [/quote] Sargun wiped your attack because it was of pure OOC motivation. This is not to say that if you just up and went launching nuclear missiles for no IC reason at all that this kind of strike would be permissible. LOLnuke attacks are frowned upon in CNRP, and are dealt with on a case-by-case basis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Timmy Posted October 9, 2010 Report Share Posted October 9, 2010 Ah ok no problem Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Enema Posted October 9, 2010 Report Share Posted October 9, 2010 I thought the whole attack was some kind of missile test.... Sheesh Timmy.. you and your vague follow on posts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Markus Wilding Posted October 10, 2010 Report Share Posted October 10, 2010 [quote name='Kankou' timestamp='1286666051' post='2479943'] *Classified* The 20,000 Koryo troops in the Commonwealth almost immediately became members of the National Inuit Armed Militia. While there still needed to be more concrete discussions, for now these troops will have their own command while nominally under the NPMC. As the most advanced and highly trained Naval Infantry of the Chosun People's Army Naval Forces, these "Inuit" troops will be the terror of any invaders. [/quote] So...does this mean that Kankou is RPing both Koryo and the "Inuit" militia? If so...then wouldn't that be RPing two entities at once? I'd like a bit of clarification here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AironthFlamewing Posted October 10, 2010 Report Share Posted October 10, 2010 Pair of Spyrolls on the NPC please (Shatner) One to plant evidence of his government attempting to attack mine The other to retrieve said evidence and to be able to use it against him. Screeny of Odds: [img]http://i498.photobucket.com/albums/rr346/graniteknight/Screen.jpg?t=1286675773[/img] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sargun II Posted October 10, 2010 Author Report Share Posted October 10, 2010 1-90 success, 91-100 fail. 14, 72. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shatner Posted October 10, 2010 Report Share Posted October 10, 2010 [quote name='Markus Wilding' timestamp='1286670315' post='2480005'] So...does this mean that Kankou is RPing both Koryo and the "Inuit" militia? If so...then wouldn't that be RPing two entities at once? I'd like a bit of clarification here. [/quote] It means Koryo has troops in the NPC disguised as part of my Inuit militia. Also, I'll accept these spy rolls for now, but what happened to the new system? I'm at DEFCON 1 and threat level severe, which was supposed to mean something now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Enema Posted October 10, 2010 Report Share Posted October 10, 2010 I don't think your defcon level means much, but I do believe Graniteknight is still obligated to actually produce some credible rp into how he goes about gathering this intelligence. My suggestions to both of you: A) Get together and work out some sort of possibility of how he could attempt it with a specific avenue of approach. B) You then PM a list of reasonable Security measures to a GM.. and by reasonable, I do mean reasonable, and I suspect you know what I mean as you did support a change of the spy rules. C) He then proceeds to make his spy run.. should he do it without getting to bananas.. he succeeds. Should he go nutters and provides a total mess of it.. the spy roll shouldn't matter. Ideally to me.. a spy roll should mean he has a chance at succeeding providing he can demonstrate a logical well laid role play for doing it. That's my read, as I'm not a GM I may well be over-ruled on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shatner Posted October 10, 2010 Report Share Posted October 10, 2010 Well that's not how granite went about it, it was just auto-win. I'd like clarification on this before I proceed with his roleplay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AironthFlamewing Posted October 10, 2010 Report Share Posted October 10, 2010 (edited) Shatner- I was planning a war game and the war game is contingent on my declaring war on you based on the idea of evidence being found against your government. So I used spy rolls Edited October 10, 2010 by graniteknight Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lestari Posted October 10, 2010 Report Share Posted October 10, 2010 [quote name='Karl Martin' timestamp='1286685708' post='2480164'] A catboy in a Youth uniform suddenly appeared in the King of Tiministan office, and disappeared, leaving only a letter behind. [/quote] ...need I say anything? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts