Jump to content

The Third Court


Sargun II

Recommended Posts

[quote name='Yawoo' timestamp='1286335308' post='2476814']
You launched twenty missiles of WWII era tech. My nation is a modern nation - it would easily be able to destroy those missiles before they impacted.

According to your IG nation you have zero tech. I have over 4,000 tech. It's not a godmod... it's technology.
[/quote]
OOC: There is no major difference between a V-2 and a Scud. You would still have to do SDI rolls since they're ballistic missiles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 893
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

[quote name='Karl Martin' timestamp='1286335701' post='2476822']
OOC: There is no major difference between a V-2 and a Scud. You would still have to do SDI rolls since they're ballistic missiles.
[/quote]
I don't think anyone consider a V-2 necessary for an SDI roll. Though, I leave that up to the GMs.

Though, if they do, it should be noted you had zero CMs at the time in your IG nation... so according to the rules, you wouldn't have been able to launch those V-2s. Correct, GMs?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Yawoo' timestamp='1286335861' post='2476828']
I don't think anyone consider a V-2 necessary for an SDI roll. Though, I leave that up to the GMs.

Though, if they do, it should be noted you had zero CMs at the time in your IG nation... so according to the rules, you wouldn't have been able to launch those V-2s. Correct, GMs?
[/quote]
You forgot that missiles have no IG basis, meaning I can have an infinite number of missiles. CMs are only for WMD. Try arguing with someone who hasn't been trying to change the system.

Now, either way, I wouldn't push for SDIs, but not letting a single missile pass is jsut godmod.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Justinian the Mighty' timestamp='1286336192' post='2476841']
Can I ask what the point is in destroying the British crown jewels? Seems childish and silly to destroy a country's property especially from a country who claims to be part of the coalition trying liberate it.
[/quote]

OOC information would be that Rüdiger von der Goltz, Minister, is an insane Pan-Germanist who does not tolerate any Germanic nations not coming under Germany's rule. THis time Wilhelm has nothing to do with this, since he's just a figurehead right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Zoot Zoot' timestamp='1286336569' post='2476846']
No it wasnt, it was an OOC move incase I end up getting England.
something along the lines of biting your nose to spite your face.
[/quote]
I actually did not expect you to get England, after all the fuss you made for Finland. I am not that much of a hater.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Zoot Zoot' timestamp='1286336738' post='2476853']
Fuss for Finland?
Derp, that was IC and OOC rantings when I wanted something to whine about after a bad day.
Yes, you are that much of a hater lol
[/quote]

Then let us be barrack mates in the Hater Division.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would like to speak up about something I don't like. Today, it seems that using a cargo ship to transport men and supplies is a convenient loophole to getting around a lack of a navy. As one of the pioneers of this method (I used it way back in 2008), I don't like what it has become. In the early days, you loaded men onto ships, and disembarked them at a friendly port, where there was proper facilities to handle ships. I was hoping that the GMs could make a rule that the only way that cargo ships can transport troops is if they can disembark at a port facility, and that cargo ships cannot be used to land troops on beaches or anything like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='KaiserMelech Mikhail' timestamp='1286338721' post='2476887']
I would like to speak up about something I don't like. Today, it seems that using a cargo ship to transport men and supplies is a convenient loophole to getting around a lack of a navy. As one of the pioneers of this method (I used it way back in 2008), I don't like what it has become. In the early days, you loaded men onto ships, and disembarked them at a friendly port, where there was proper facilities to handle ships. I was hoping that the GMs could make a rule that the only way that cargo ships can transport troops is if they can disembark at a port facility, and that cargo ships cannot be used to land troops on beaches or anything like that.
[/quote]
Cargo ships can not beach, they will run aground. Now you can launch motorboats after motorboats, but you would be limited to light weaponry, supplies, and infantry.

But god help your invasion fleet if the enemy has a navy with lots of anti-ship defenses and ground forces stationed close to the invasion sites and was alerted of your presence from a long distance away while you send a massive fleet of unescorted cargo ships and motorboats.

Edited by HHAYD
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='KaiserMelech Mikhail' timestamp='1286338721' post='2476887']
I would like to speak up about something I don't like. Today, it seems that using a cargo ship to transport men and supplies is a convenient loophole to getting around a lack of a navy. As one of the pioneers of this method (I used it way back in 2008), I don't like what it has become. In the early days, you loaded men onto ships, and disembarked them at a friendly port, where there was proper facilities to handle ships. I was hoping that the GMs could make a rule that the only way that cargo ships can transport troops is if they can disembark at a port facility, and that cargo ships cannot be used to land troops on beaches or anything like that.
[/quote]

On beaches? Which idiot does that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Tidy Bowl Man' timestamp='1286358879' post='2477037']
I hear they are doing wonderful things with dehydrated ports. Further, I'm curious as to why Zoot's attacks on British monuments are being allowed when they are so clearly being motivated by OOC feelings of British nationalism.
[/quote]
If Zoot wants to be a really bad British nationalist and blow up the Tower of London, that's fine. All that needs to happen is for the next person who RPs England to not recognize anything that happens in this war, and everything will go back to normal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I destroyed the landmarks so historical artifacts wernt looted.
Englands next owner can just say the items in question were relocated to a safer location when the counter attack on Britain began.

Edited by Zoot Zoot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Karl Martin' timestamp='1286336177' post='2476840']
You forgot that missiles have no IG basis, meaning I can have an infinite number of missiles. CMs are only for WMD. Try arguing with someone who hasn't been trying to change the system.

Now, either way, I wouldn't push for SDIs, but not letting a single missile pass is jsut godmod.
[/quote]

SDI rolls are only made for special missiles that go against a nation's IG CM count and nuclear weapons. So, feel free to push for an SDI roll - you won't get it. Now, try arguing/spreading your OOC B.S. with someone who doesn't know the rules like I do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Yawoo' timestamp='1286369461' post='2477104']
SDI rolls are only made for special missiles that go against a nation's IG CM count and nuclear weapons. So, feel free to push for an SDI roll - you won't get it. Now, try arguing/spreading your OOC B.S. with someone who doesn't know the rules like I do.
[/quote]

I could have sworn SDI rolls were only used for weapons that were counted under IG nukes, and even then, only when the target it within your nation's boundaries IC. IG CM count weapons either have no counter to them, or simply have a penalty attached to them depending on how many MDs the target has. I'd need clarification on this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Executive Minister' timestamp='1286371900' post='2477121']
I could have sworn SDI rolls were only used for weapons that were counted under IG nukes, and even then, only when the target it within your nation's boundaries IC. IG CM count weapons either have no counter to them, or simply have a penalty attached to them depending on how many MDs the target has. I'd need clarification on this.
[/quote]
Ah, well either way, in this instance, Karl Martin can not push for an SDI roll as it still wouldn't fall under the category.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...