LRA KING Posted July 20, 2010 Report Share Posted July 20, 2010 [font="Comic Sans MS"][center][IMG]http://i455.photobucket.com/albums/qq274/LRA_08/flag-3.gif[/IMG] [IMG]http://i455.photobucket.com/albums/qq274/LRA_08/ucr-1.jpg[/IMG][/center] As you already know some alliances like picking on the red team alot and we figured alone we are weak together we are even [s][u]weaker[/u][/s] amean stronger . With no further to do Red Elite Defence and Union of Communist Republics sign this treaty as a sign of how much they mean to one another and an official decree to do all that is needed when asked. Whereas the alliances known as Red Elite Defence and Union of Communist Republics wish to remain sovereign and independent alliances comprised of independent sovereign nations; whereas both alliances recognize the benefits of inter-alliance cooperation; Whereas RED and UCR are both committed to the survival, growth and prosperity of one another, Let the following be agreed upon. [u][b]I.[/b][/u] Henceforth, member nations of UCR shall NEVER attack members of RED and member nations of the RED shall NEVER attack members of UCR . Reparations, for illegal attacks, may be requested by the defender via his alliance leader. Such reparations, as well as any subsequent punishment for the infringing nation shall be discussed and agreed upon by the leaders of both alliances, with the ultimate aim to restore harmony between the two groups. [u][b]II.[/b][/u] When either signed alliance (being UCR or RED) is attacked by an outside nation and/or alliance, the other signed alliance will help the defender(s) defeat the aggressor(s) using a reasonable amount of resources. This will be at the discretion of alliance leadership. Both alliances recognize that their ultimate duty is the survival of their own membership and hereby agree not to deem the other party negligent in their assisting duties if doing so would pose an imminent risk of destruction to their alliance. For these purposes, both parties agree that World wars, Chained wars, and odds of six or more to one are to be considered overwhelming. [u][b]III.[/b][/u] In the event either signed alliances initiate aggressive hostilities with an outside party, it is strongly encouraged, though not mandatory, for the other party bound by this treaty to assist with full military, financial, and diplomatic aid. [u][b]IV.[/b][/u] Engagement in all significant inter-alliance Wars shall be shared between leaders of each signed alliance before hostilities ensue. Failure to do so is cause for cancellation of this contract. Minor hostilities need not be reported between the alliance leaders. For these purposes, "significant" will be defined as "any incited hostilities where more than 25% of the respective alliances membership is involved." Important international information must be shared between the two alliances´ leaders; failure to forward vital information can result in the cancellation of this treaty. [u][b]V.[/b][/u] Whereas aid is central to the growth of new and developing nations, both alliances recognize the need for each alliance to have control over their domestic affairs and as such Inter-alliance Aid shall be given only if both rulers agree. The primary source of aid for new and developing nations shall be from their own alliance. Demands for aid, from individual nations will be ignored and reported to both alliance leaders. [u][b]VI.[/b][/u] This Military Defense and Optional Aggression Pact is broken if any of the above clauses are not followed correctly and/or 7 days notice and an explanation as to why the agreement is to become void is submitted to the other alliance. Such notice shall give the other party ample time to present arguments as to why the cancellation should not take place, and the party seeking cancellation agrees to take their positions into consideration before the final decision for separation shall be made.[/font] [b]Signed for the UCR[/b] RA2Leader, Premier Tillistan, Chairman of the CPUCR [b] Signed for RED[/b] LRA KING, President Revolution, Speaker Black Arrow, Speaker Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cortath Posted July 20, 2010 Report Share Posted July 20, 2010 Congratulations to our comrades on the Red Sphere! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Higher Covenant Posted July 20, 2010 Report Share Posted July 20, 2010 Congrats! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mythicknight Posted July 20, 2010 Report Share Posted July 20, 2010 Commies grouping together Congrats and such. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Branimir Posted July 20, 2010 Report Share Posted July 20, 2010 Good luck Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NLights Posted July 20, 2010 Report Share Posted July 20, 2010 But think of the poor, innocent raiders this treaty hurts. Congratulations. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wickedj Posted July 20, 2010 Report Share Posted July 20, 2010 (edited) Disregard, misread the OP @NorthernLights, RED allows tech raiding per their charter unless the wikia is outdated Edited July 20, 2010 by wickedj Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Branimir Posted July 20, 2010 Report Share Posted July 20, 2010 [quote name='wickedj' date='20 July 2010 - 11:33 PM' timestamp='1279661601' post='2381309'] Uhh i have a stupid question about clause I. Do either of you even ALLOW tech raiding? if you dont then your jab at MK, \m/, etc is quite silly though im sure they appreciate the thought that you had to put into upgrading a treaty just to attempt to spite them [/quote] What in lords name are you talking about? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Groucho Marx Posted July 20, 2010 Report Share Posted July 20, 2010 (edited) [quote name='Branimir' date='20 July 2010 - 05:36 PM' timestamp='1279661772' post='2381311'] What in lords name are you talking about? [/quote] Probably referring to title in conjunction with Article I of the treaty. Which was pointless. It's already implied in treaties between alliances that they won't raid/attack one another. But I reckon they felt the need to literally state it in light of recent events. Edited July 20, 2010 by Emperor Marx Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LRA KING Posted July 20, 2010 Author Report Share Posted July 20, 2010 Who said anything about spittin \m/ :/ the title is because RED has been on a voyage to reunite the red team and let me break the title down for you before people get flattered and think we are indirecting them some how. Red - thats the team both the alliance involved in this treaty reside on. Safari - Its the exploring or hunting (OF TREATIES IN THIS CASE). Happy with that break down Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ktarthan Posted July 20, 2010 Report Share Posted July 20, 2010 While neither of these alliances are small enough to raid in the first place, congrats on the treaty nonetheless. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exige Posted July 20, 2010 Report Share Posted July 20, 2010 commies Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Infidel Israeli Posted July 20, 2010 Report Share Posted July 20, 2010 I can vouch for UCR, great allies. and RA2, when did you start leading? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caleb279 Posted July 20, 2010 Report Share Posted July 20, 2010 o/ New treaties! *Goes to redraw the lines* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slonq Posted July 20, 2010 Report Share Posted July 20, 2010 [quote name='Infidel Israeli' date='20 July 2010 - 06:19 PM' timestamp='1279664327' post='2381367'] I can vouch for UCR, great allies. and RA2, when did you start leading? [/quote] When Nikita and I were voted out. (It was in January) I am pleased to see this as a sign of growing unity among the left, and hope that relations between our two alliances will grow and prosper. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Banksy Posted July 21, 2010 Report Share Posted July 21, 2010 Congratulations to our comrades in the red sphere! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Infidel Israeli Posted July 21, 2010 Report Share Posted July 21, 2010 [quote name='slonq' date='20 July 2010 - 06:55 PM' timestamp='1279670138' post='2381519'] When Nikita and I were voted out. (It was in January) I am pleased to see this as a sign of growing unity among the left, and hope that relations between our two alliances will grow and prosper. [/quote] I'm sorry. Nikkita i saw coming though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DictatatorDan Posted July 21, 2010 Report Share Posted July 21, 2010 [color="#FF0000"]Reduntant Drawing Lines Being Drawn Comment...[/color] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief Stubbs Posted July 21, 2010 Report Share Posted July 21, 2010 Hey. This has nothing to do with the Red Raiding Safari. I've been had! Also, lawl, individual sovereign nations and stuff, and yet I remember reading from a certain set of logs that RED is a Communist alliance... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberious Posted July 21, 2010 Report Share Posted July 21, 2010 Congratulations. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pd73bassman Posted July 21, 2010 Report Share Posted July 21, 2010 Commies defending commies Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James IV Posted July 21, 2010 Report Share Posted July 21, 2010 Haha, I don't blame ya with the Red Safari out there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the masheen Posted July 21, 2010 Report Share Posted July 21, 2010 congrats to all involved! Good luck on your quest to unite the sphere LRA King. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Farore Posted July 21, 2010 Report Share Posted July 21, 2010 Congrats on the treaty guys and its nice seeing you LRA again, even though I wasn't expecting you leading an alliance. Guess we have been lacking in communication since we departed from the same AA. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ashoka the Great Posted July 21, 2010 Report Share Posted July 21, 2010 [quote name='LRA KING' date='20 July 2010 - 05:18 PM' timestamp='1279660675' post='2381287'] [u][b]II.[/b][/u] When either signed alliance (being UCR or RED) is attacked by an outside nation and/or alliance, the other signed alliance will help the defender(s) defeat the aggressor(s) using a reasonable amount of resources. This will be at the discretion of alliance leadership. Both alliances recognize that their ultimate duty is the survival of their own membership and hereby agree not to deem the other party negligent in their assisting duties if doing so would pose an imminent risk of destruction to their alliance. For these purposes, both parties agree that World wars, Chained wars, and odds of six or more to one are to be considered overwhelming.[/quote] This is priceless. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.