iamthey Posted July 1, 2010 Report Share Posted July 1, 2010 (edited) [quote] [center][size=5][b]Global Order of Decision-makers Internationally Supporting the Development of Existing Alliances and Dispositions[/b][/size] [b]G.O.D.I.S.D.E.A.D[/b][/center] In the desire to recognize the present state of existence, and not indulge in fantastic and impossible visions of divine providence the following nations hereby commit themselves to this pact. [b]Article 1: Pre-requites for member states.[/b] Section A: The candidate for membership must have a government. The more authoritarian the better, but democracies are welcome as well. Section B: Governments may have any sort of policy with respect to religion. The more religion is suppressed the better, of course, but theocracies are also welcome to join. Section C: The Governments may seize any land they are capable of seizing, though they should be mindful that others might try to obstruct their expansion. Section D: Anyone can join this organization at any time, there is no approval process it is 100% open. [b]Article 2: Pre-emptive war.[/b] Section A: Is allowed. Section B: Members signing this treaty may sign any outside treaty they see fit as they are sovereign governments. These may include MANDATORY aggression treaties. Section D: A member who has had an optional aggression treaty activated shall act in whatever way they deem fit. [b]Article 3: Trade and communication.[/b] Section A: Members pledge to work together to attempt to minimize tariffs and attempt to get as close to a free-trade policy as possible amongst themselves. [s]Section B: Members pledge to make a best effort to let their currencies float openly on the free market and not engage in any forms of currency manipulation. However, since some economies rely on a pegged currency the negotiation of currency pricing between states shall be acceptable as long as it is agreed upon. Nations which make it their official policy to have a weighted market basket currency prior to signing this treaty and are accepted into this treaty are accepted in the understanding those practices shall continue in order to keep their internal economy stable.[/s] (No one does that in CNRP anyway.) Section C: Members pledge to continue their present immigration policies, and may make any changes to them as they desire. Section D: In the event of a major threat to trade such as the outbreak of diseases among livestock members will clean up their own mess. [b]Article 4: Optional Mutual Defense.[/b] Section A: In the event an offensive military action is taken a member state, all nations have the option to enter in their defense. It should be noted that support is encouraged [s]by a piece of paper[/s]. [b]Article 5: Optional Mutual Aggression.[/b] Section A: In the event that one party to this treaty engages in aggressive action against another, all member states have the option to support them in this fight. Support is again encouraged. [b]Article 6: Optional Non-Aggression[/b] Section A: In the event that one party to this treaty desires war with another, they have the option of abstaining from the indulgence of this desire. Abstainer is encouraged, but of course, according to some, isn't always effective. [b]Article 6: Modification[/b] Section A: This treaty may never be modified. [b]Article 7: Peaceful Departure[/b] Section A: Anyone may leave this bloc at any time for whatever reason. [b]Signatures[/b] [b]For Greater Pacifica:[/b] [b]H.M Ryn Atrevier:[/b] [img]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v624/iamthey/RynAtreviersig-1.png[/img] King of Greater Pacifica Rex Pacifica Signed for the [b]Athenian Federation[/b], [img]http://img444.imageshack.us/img444/7435/e9634eeeb3bfe7bc40dc1c4.png[/img] Empress Nikita Akhatova Akhmed Shakir, President of the SSRN [size="3"][font="Book Antiqua"]Gregor Eivanov[/font] Premier of the Isara Alliance[/size] Lord Mhoram High Lord of Revelstone by choice of the Council [s]United Isocoles Signed, Leo Zeelan Odalis Oceana[/s][/quote] Edited July 2, 2010 by iamthey Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Centurius Posted July 1, 2010 Report Share Posted July 1, 2010 (edited) We support this treaty in the fullest and seek membership. Signed for the [b]Athenian Federation[/b], [img]http://img444.imageshack.us/img444/7435/e9634eeeb3bfe7bc40dc1c4.png[/img] Empress Nikita Akhatova Edited July 1, 2010 by Centurius Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamthey Posted July 1, 2010 Author Report Share Posted July 1, 2010 We thank the Athenian Federation for their participation in this great treaty. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maelstrom Vortex Posted July 1, 2010 Report Share Posted July 1, 2010 "Nice Parody." was the only comment coming out of the U.S. ooc: I've attempted to manipulate currencies and play economics in the past. It's just everyone else went no-u and said they had closed economies in response, lol. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Voodoo Nova Posted July 1, 2010 Report Share Posted July 1, 2010 "We support this treaty." stated Shakir. He signed the treaty in his name, Akhmed Shakir, President of the SSRN Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamthey Posted July 1, 2010 Author Report Share Posted July 1, 2010 [quote name='Maelstrom Vortex' date='01 July 2010 - 04:13 PM' timestamp='1277997195' post='2356635'] "Nice Parody." was the only comment coming out of the U.S. [/quote] "This is no parody, this is a serious gathering of nations! We seek the security of our sovereignty: the freedom of a non-committal the- " The representative spoke as a colleague nudged him pointing to the acronym. "Eh, that is an interesting coincidence, to say the least- but we assure you it was non-intentional, sometimes these things just happen." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilantWatcher Posted July 1, 2010 Report Share Posted July 1, 2010 The Republic of Madurastan wishes to sign this treaty. [b]Sophie Brown President of the Republic of Madurastan[/b] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaede Alexeivich Posted July 1, 2010 Report Share Posted July 1, 2010 (edited) The Isara Alliance would like to sign this treaty. [size="3"][font="Book Antiqua"]Gregor Eivanov[/font] Premier of the Isara Alliance[/size] OOC: I actually had an idea for a GODISDEAD bloc, never thought anyone would actually try it XD Edited July 1, 2010 by Kaede Alexeivich Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AironthFlamewing Posted July 1, 2010 Report Share Posted July 1, 2010 we wish to sign Lord Mhoram High Lord of Revelstone by choice of the Council Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vedran Posted July 1, 2010 Report Share Posted July 1, 2010 OOC: Lol. Personally I would have chosen the Global Organization of Democratic Leaders Ensuring Security and Stability but this is pretty great. Not going to join though, so have fun. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fizzydog Posted July 1, 2010 Report Share Posted July 1, 2010 We don't get the point of this treaty, but why not? United Isocoles Signed, Leo Zeelan Odalis Oceana. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zzzptm Posted July 1, 2010 Report Share Posted July 1, 2010 We of Himynamistan will not be party to this treaty. It insults the dignity of the common people of the world, the true heroes of history. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subtleknifewielder Posted July 1, 2010 Report Share Posted July 1, 2010 [quote name='Vedran' date='01 July 2010 - 10:15 AM' timestamp='1278004499' post='2356804'] OOC: Lol. Personally I would have chosen the Global Organization of Democratic Leaders Ensuring Security and Stability but this is pretty great. Not going to join though, so have fun. [/quote] OOC: Lawl [quote name='Fizzydog' date='01 July 2010 - 10:39 AM' timestamp='1278005975' post='2356819'] We don't get the point of this treaty, but why not? United Isocoles Signed, Leo Zeelan Odalis Oceana. [/quote] OOC: Um...you realize this really is a parody of the GODSWILL treaty? IC: "This treaty is, if anything, even more ridiculous than the GODSWILL treaty." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fizzydog Posted July 1, 2010 Report Share Posted July 1, 2010 [quote name='Subtleknifewielder' date='01 July 2010 - 02:59 PM' timestamp='1278014368' post='2356973'] OOC: Lawl OOC: Um...you realize this really is a parody of the GODSWILL treaty? IC: "This treaty is, if anything, even more ridiculous than the GODSWILL treaty." [/quote] OoC: I realize this completely. I just signed up as a joke. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sarah Tintagyl Posted July 1, 2010 Report Share Posted July 1, 2010 "Allies don't let allies join blocs just for the acronym." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fizzydog Posted July 1, 2010 Report Share Posted July 1, 2010 We are going to activate Article Seven. This bloc is meh, and the acronym is offensive. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamthey Posted July 2, 2010 Author Report Share Posted July 2, 2010 We are grateful to those who have come together to form this excellent community. [quote name='Sarah Tintagyl' date='01 July 2010 - 09:08 PM' timestamp='1278014864' post='2356986'] "Allies don't let allies join blocs just for the acronym." [/quote] "I don't think anyone is joining this organization simply for some silly acronym, honestly we didn't even notice that..." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Germanic Republic Posted July 2, 2010 Report Share Posted July 2, 2010 How is the acronym any more offensive than GODSWILL? It's a coincidence, as stated. Both are, we have been assured. OOC: ;D Love it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sarah Tintagyl Posted July 2, 2010 Report Share Posted July 2, 2010 [quote name='Germanic Republic' date='02 July 2010 - 06:53 AM' timestamp='1278049999' post='2357494'] How is the acronym any more offensive than GODSWILL? It's a coincidence, as stated. Both are, we have been assured. OOC: ;D Love it. [/quote] "GODSWILL was just as bad, we had just hoped the stupidity had stopped there. Apparently, it has not." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maelstrom Vortex Posted July 2, 2010 Report Share Posted July 2, 2010 "God's Will was intentional, though the treaty itself is secular. It was intended on showing that we have a respect for all religions and their right of worship." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.