JimKongIl Posted June 8, 2010 Report Share Posted June 8, 2010 I think there is no doubt in TE that casualties caused is most important measure of success in warfare. For a general, casualties inflicted upon an army under your charge is something to be ashamed of. Casualties inflicted upon the enemies is the true measure of a general. Personal casualties are easier to manipulate by not deploying/buying tanks. Casualties caused should replace casualties received on the awards screen and on the View Nation page. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frostfirefox Posted June 8, 2010 Report Share Posted June 8, 2010 I thought of the same thing not 2 weeks ago but it became lost in my brain. This idea is pure win Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimKongIl Posted June 8, 2010 Author Report Share Posted June 8, 2010 [quote name='Frostfirefox' date='08 June 2010 - 03:08 AM' timestamp='1275984489' post='2328673'] I thought of the same thing not 2 weeks ago but it became lost in my brain. This idea is pure win [/quote] To me it makes sense. No commander would brag about the number of soldiers under his command that were killed but that's all we have to go on. To track both casualties received AND casualties inflicted would be exceptional but I would settle for just tracking casualties caused since programatically it might be easier to implement. I truly hope Admin considers this suggestion. If you have thoughts on this please post them. I'd like to add that this is not a criticism, just a suggestion. I think the latest changes are very nice and the hard work put into them is evident. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.