Lord Brendan Posted May 15, 2010 Report Share Posted May 15, 2010 (edited) Strikes me as setting yourself up for conflicts of interest when you make a bloc out of 4 alliances that are all in other blocs (plus FEAR is in two blocs). "Non chaining" sounds good on paper, but we'll see how that works out in reality. + good luck/congratulations, etc. Edited May 15, 2010 by Lord Brendan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Teets Posted May 15, 2010 Report Share Posted May 15, 2010 [quote name='M6 Redneck' date='15 May 2010 - 02:31 PM' timestamp='1273951875' post='2298977'] If not for the inclusion of Hydra this would be CDT lite. However adding Hydra to the mix makes this CDT (rhymes with lite and is not complementary). \M/6 [/quote] It's good to see you still care about us [quote name='Lord Brendan' date='15 May 2010 - 02:56 PM' timestamp='1273953401' post='2298993'] Strikes me as setting yourself up for conflicts of interest when you make a bloc out of 4 alliances that are all in other blocs (plus FEAR is in two blocs). "Non chaining" sounds good on paper, but we'll see how that works out in reality. + good luck/congratulations, etc. [/quote] Hydra isn't involved in any other bloc. NSO was one of our 2 MDP level treaties prior to this agreement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Brendan Posted May 15, 2010 Report Share Posted May 15, 2010 [quote name='Mr. Teets' date='15 May 2010 - 04:03 PM' timestamp='1273953815' post='2298999'] Hydra isn't involved in any other bloc. NSO was one of our 2 MDP level treaties prior to this agreement. [/quote] My mistake, for some reason I had the impression you were in Terra-Cotta. I see now that you're purple. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hakim Posted May 15, 2010 Report Share Posted May 15, 2010 [quote name='Lord Brendan' date='15 May 2010 - 12:56 PM' timestamp='1273953401' post='2298993'] Strikes me as setting yourself up for conflicts of interest when you make a bloc out of [b]4 alliances that are all in other blocs[/b] (plus FEAR is in two blocs). "Non chaining" sounds good on paper, but we'll see how that works out in reality. [/quote] NATO is not in any other bloc either...sooooooooo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Brendan Posted May 15, 2010 Report Share Posted May 15, 2010 (edited) [quote name='Hakim' date='15 May 2010 - 04:10 PM' timestamp='1273954183' post='2299005'] NATO is not in any other bloc either...sooooooooo [/quote] What the hell, thought you were in P&L. Next you're going to tell me that FEAR isn't in CDT anymore. Edited May 15, 2010 by Lord Brendan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heyman Posted May 15, 2010 Report Share Posted May 15, 2010 This looks a bit sexy, if I may say so myself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canik Posted May 15, 2010 Report Share Posted May 15, 2010 [quote name='Lord Brendan' date='15 May 2010 - 02:56 PM' timestamp='1273953401' post='2298993'] Strikes me as setting yourself up for conflicts of interest when you make a bloc out of 4 alliances that are all in other blocs (plus FEAR is in two blocs). "Non chaining" sounds good on paper, but we'll see how that works out in reality. + good luck/congratulations, etc. [/quote] FEAR left CDT, the only other bloc we're in is BFF and it's never conflicted with our interests before. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lebubu Posted May 15, 2010 Report Share Posted May 15, 2010 This is wonderful news! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo Niagara Posted May 15, 2010 Report Share Posted May 15, 2010 Very interesting turn of events... o/ and such... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duncan King Posted May 15, 2010 Report Share Posted May 15, 2010 [quote name='Lord Brendan' date='15 May 2010 - 03:12 PM' timestamp='1273954356' post='2299008'] What the hell, thought you were in P&L. Next you're going to tell me that FEAR isn't in CDT anymore. [/quote] NATO's not in P and L [i]yet[/i], an oversight we should correct soon. FEAR has indeed left CDT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ak47don Posted May 15, 2010 Report Share Posted May 15, 2010 good luck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KainIIIC Posted May 15, 2010 Report Share Posted May 15, 2010 This is an extremely sexy bloc. Comments from Xiphosis and MK make it even better [img]http://img149.imageshack.us/img149/467/nsosmugsmall.png[/img] Here's a toast to our spreading of teh evil! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starfox101 Posted May 15, 2010 Report Share Posted May 15, 2010 Hydra...NATO...FEAR...? Not exactly a grouping of military powerhouses, but good luck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krunk the Great Posted May 15, 2010 Report Share Posted May 15, 2010 [quote name='Starfox101' date='15 May 2010 - 07:24 PM' timestamp='1273965867' post='2299154'] Hydra...NATO...FEAR...? Not exactly a grouping of military powerhouses, but good luck. [/quote] With all due respect sir, Do a Barrel Roll. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Merrie Melodies Posted May 16, 2010 Report Share Posted May 16, 2010 Considering I utterly despise 3 out of 4 signatory alliance in this bloc I am stoked. Here's to hoping I can watch all three get decimated at the same time now, Sorry NSO, in my house we try to wipe the likes of your bloc mates off the bottom of our shoes before crossing the threshold. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deathcat Posted May 16, 2010 Report Share Posted May 16, 2010 Congrats to our friends in coming together and making a very solid looking bloc oo/NSO oo/NATO ooo/ Hydra Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Uruk Posted May 16, 2010 Report Share Posted May 16, 2010 [quote name='Starfox101' date='15 May 2010 - 06:24 PM' timestamp='1273965867' post='2299154'] Hydra...NATO...FEAR...? Not exactly a grouping of military powerhouses, but good luck. [/quote] It makes me think that the next war just jumped ahead a month or two. Everyone knows that whoever hits NSO without having to chain treaties or anything like that gets the pleasure of these four fabulous alliances working against them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
m3g4tr0n Posted May 16, 2010 Report Share Posted May 16, 2010 Congratulations! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebel Virginia Posted May 16, 2010 Report Share Posted May 16, 2010 (edited) [quote name='Merrie Melodies' date='15 May 2010 - 08:05 PM' timestamp='1273968296' post='2299191'] Considering I utterly despise 3 out of 4 signatory alliance in this bloc I am stoked. Here's to hoping I can watch all three get decimated at the same time now, Sorry NSO, in my house we try to wipe the likes of your bloc mates off the bottom of our shoes before crossing the threshold. [/quote] [color="#0000FF"]Well, well, if it isn't \m/ talking big. With all due respect sir, bring it. Having \m/'s approval has never been a priority of ours.[/color] Edited May 16, 2010 by Rebel Virginia Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoFish Posted May 16, 2010 Report Share Posted May 16, 2010 [quote name='Rebel Virginia' date='15 May 2010 - 09:01 PM' timestamp='1273971646' post='2299256'] [color="#0000FF"]Well, well, if it isn't \m/ talking big. With all do respect sir, bring it. Having \m/'s approval has never been a priority of ours.[/color] [/quote] I wasn't aware \m/ disapproved of the RIA. I thought everyone liked you guys Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aurion Posted May 16, 2010 Report Share Posted May 16, 2010 Congrats to the signatories. NATO's picked up some pretty decent allies in NSO, at least from what I've seen. OOC: [i]Please[/i] tell me that the historical irony was intentional. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Uruk Posted May 16, 2010 Report Share Posted May 16, 2010 [quote name='Rebel Virginia' date='15 May 2010 - 08:01 PM' timestamp='1273971646' post='2299256'] [color="#0000FF"]Well, well, if it isn't \m/ talking big. With all do respect sir, bring it. Having \m/'s approval has never been a priority of ours.[/color] [/quote] Either your AA's wrong or \m/ has absolutely no problem with you. If your AA is wrong, just think, this guy actually loves NSO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacapo Saladin Posted May 16, 2010 Report Share Posted May 16, 2010 [quote name='Merrie Melodies' date='15 May 2010 - 08:05 PM' timestamp='1273968296' post='2299191'] Considering I utterly despise 3 out of 4 signatory alliance in this bloc I am stoked. Here's to hoping I can watch all three get decimated at the same time now, Sorry NSO, in my house we try to wipe the likes of your bloc mates off the bottom of our shoes before crossing the threshold. [/quote] Well I for one would like to know what we did to be despised. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Uruk Posted May 16, 2010 Report Share Posted May 16, 2010 [quote name='Jacapo Saladin' date='15 May 2010 - 08:21 PM' timestamp='1273972878' post='2299280'] Well I for one would like to know what we did to be despised. [/quote] tbqh Hydra's the only alliance out of the four that I find to be decent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hakim Posted May 16, 2010 Report Share Posted May 16, 2010 [quote name='Starfox101' date='15 May 2010 - 04:24 PM' timestamp='1273965867' post='2299154'] Hydra...NATO...FEAR...? Not exactly a grouping of military powerhouses, but good luck. [/quote] Look at the last war and the number that were thrown against these three alliances and come back and see me some time. Usually I would not respond to people such as you. But for your direct insult I will make an exception. As the leader of the NATO military, come and see me some time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts