Top 250 nations by alliance

[Haflinger]

GPA: 27
WTF: 24
Grämlins: 13
FOK: 9
TDO: 8
UPN: 7
MHA: 7
VE: 6
OBR: 5
Umbrella: 5
Sparta: 4
CSN: 4
TOP: 3
TTK: 3
Ragnarok: 3
OG: 3
FCC: 2
Fark: 2
ODN: 2
NpO: 2
GOD: 2
Argent: 2
Kronos: 2
NPO: 1
Brigade: 1
R&R: 1
IRON: 1
FoB: 1
STA: 1
NV: 1
=LOST=: 0
MA: 0
RIA: 0
Vanguard: 0
MK: 0
GR: 0
Athens: 0
NSO: 0

I included all members of Superfriends, C&G, plus former members of Citadel + Frostbite, all sanctioned alliances, and every large alliance with a nation in the top 40.

Maybe we can all salivate at the thought of a GPA-WTF cage match now

Edited February 24, 2010 by Haflinger

[kriekfreak]

See the Neutrals are killing this game. Time to take them out. And it's also interesting to see that TOP only has 3 nations in the top250. How is that possible?

Edited February 23, 2010 by kriekfreak

[der_ko]

These numbers will change considerable once everyone is at peace and spends their warchest rebuilding their nations.

[Haflinger]

Yep, that's one of the reasons I posted them here now.

[Tequila Mockingbird]

Time to join the GPA powerhouse.

[Horatio Longworth]

I think I did something like this when I did the calculations for the TPF war.


*misspelled a word

Edited February 23, 2010 by Horatio Longworth

[Vespassianus]

Hey Haf i'm top 250

[rsoxbronco1]

ODN: 2
=LOST=: 0
Vanguard: 0
MK: 0
GR: 0
Athens: 0

For shamed, ODN. I thought you had changed.

[Tulafaras]

does anyone have a stat what used to be rank 250 before we blew each other to pieces? (NS wise i mean, since 97k is enough for rank 250 now, i was curious how far that had dropped).

[James I]

It'll be interesting to look back on these numbers three weeks after peace is reached.

[WcaesarD]

I wish we had stats from just before this war started. Nicely done though, cool to see how things are playing out at the very top.

[Bob Janova]

It was about 110-120k before the war I think. And TOP had a lot more people in the top 250 . It only takes a few days of war to shed all that infra and therefore the first 50-75k of NS, though.

[Cataduanes]

[quote name='rsoxbronco1' date='23 February 2010 - 03:20 PM' timestamp='1266938431' post='2199025']
ODN: 2
=LOST=: 0
Vanguard: 0
MK: 0
GR: 0
Athens: 0

For shamed, ODN. I thought you had changed.
[/quote]
One of them did fight before, and will hopefully do so again soon. The other is either inacitve or worse still; he is avoiding the war . The rest of us however have and will continue to do our share of bleeding.

[PhysicsJunky]

I'm sort of curious what methodology you choose when deciding which alliances to list and which to exclude.

[janax]

[quote name='Haflinger' date='23 February 2010 - 07:33 AM' timestamp='1266932033' post='2198946']
I included all members of Superfriends, C&G, plus former members of Citadel + Frostbite, all sanctioned alliances, and every large alliance with a nation in the top 40
[/quote]


I'm guessing this methodology was used...

Edited February 23, 2010 by janax

[Epiphanus]

Kronos has 2 and isn't on the list... rude.


If you included the brigade, you obviously could include Kronos.

Edited February 23, 2010 by Epiphanus

[Trace]

[quote name='Tulafaras' date='23 February 2010 - 10:40 AM' timestamp='1266939647' post='2199046']
does anyone have a stat what used to be rank 250 before we blew each other to pieces? (NS wise i mean, since 97k is enough for rank 250 now, i was curious how far that had dropped).
[/quote]

I was 110K before the war and ranked about 300 or so.

[PhysicsJunky]

[quote name='janax' date='23 February 2010 - 11:43 AM' timestamp='1266943386' post='2199123']
I'm guessing this methodology was used...
[/quote]

"large alliance" is not a methodology. We have over a million NS and I'm pretty sure at least five nations in the top 250 (my hands are tied for the exact number at work).

[Epiphanus]

[quote name='PhysicsJunky' date='23 February 2010 - 10:47 AM' timestamp='1266943678' post='2199131']
"large alliance" is not a methodology. We have over a million NS and I'm pretty sure at least five nations in the top 250 (my hands are tied for the exact number at work).
[/quote]
You have 5.

[PhysicsJunky]

[quote name='Epiphanus' date='23 February 2010 - 11:50 AM' timestamp='1266943820' post='2199136']
You have 5.[/quote]

Thanks, I couldn't say for sure where that back line falls nowadays, this war has everything sitting funny.

[janax]

Well, 1 million isn't large and since you don't have 20 members, you don't actually show up on the alliance list I don't believe. So that's likely why you wouldn't have been included.

You would actually have to know your alliance name and search for it, for him to have included them. (or click on each of the top 250)

[Noob Cake]

123k was about 170ish prewar. Now 102k lands you at 180.

[flak attack]

I know the top 5% was about 80k before this. It's now at 61k

[mattski133]

This is fairly interesting but I feel like it leaves out quite a bit also, as it only appears to account for 150/250 largest nations.

Considering the cut off at 40 alliances is around 2.5 million...maybe we should push it to 80

[Jyrinx]

[quote name='janax' date='23 February 2010 - 12:01 PM' timestamp='1266944461' post='2199148']
Well, 1 million isn't large and since you don't have 20 members, you don't actually show up on the alliance list I don't believe. So that's likely why you wouldn't have been included.

You would actually have to know your alliance name and search for it, for him to have included them. (or click on each of the top 250)
[/quote]

Meh, fair enough. We need to go recruit 9 more nations so we show up on the list I suppose.

But yeah, for anyone that cares (probably not many) Créole has 11 members, 5 of them in the top 250. Member #6 (by strength) is almost there at rank #262. And I'm bringing down their average by a ton.

Carry on.

Edited February 23, 2010 by Jyrinx