juslen Posted February 16, 2010 Report Share Posted February 16, 2010 This war is so pointless that none of the witty comebacks and sarcastic comments can even muster as much as a smirk from me. Keep up the good work guys. Oh boy, now I have gone and done it! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emperor Badger Posted February 16, 2010 Report Share Posted February 16, 2010 Lol, You want us to surrender to you before the real fun even begins? I think you need to double check who you are fighting again... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Groucho Marx Posted February 16, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 16, 2010 [quote name='Crymson' date='15 February 2010 - 08:28 PM' timestamp='1266283718' post='2183844'] Given that you're a triumvir in the alliance that is offering the terms, can you really be depended upon to provide an impartial opinion on these terms? That said, I don't see how forcing that ridiculous soldier % term on anyone can be called fair, honorable or just, as you're almost certainly have included it only so that you will have an excuse to attack any PoWs who might mistakenly have more than 25% (perhaps you'll ZI them, as noted in term #9; that term doesn't seem so fair, honorable or just either---it certainly seems severe!). Given that one can buy his or her nation's maximum number of soldiers in all of ten seconds, what other use could that term have? Anyway, this is all moot, because it's very unlikely that individuals of such high fighting quality as the members of BAPS (Edit: or Valhalla; sorry, I missed your name in the OP) will surrender to you. [/quote] Well, 20-30% is usually acceptable. We decided to try something different and set the limit at 25%. I don't see any harm in that, you're just looking for any reason to demonize the fair terms we're offering to individuals. Even someone like you should be able to follow them without any serious difficulty. And ZI is pretty fair. Prisoners of War will be shot if they try to escape or aid the enemy. A common practice, really. But it's so bad when the other side does it, right? Of course. That said, I hope you enjoy the same level of benevolence from C&G that BAPS and Valhalla will get from us. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caliph Posted February 16, 2010 Report Share Posted February 16, 2010 [quote name='Newhotness' date='15 February 2010 - 06:41 PM' timestamp='1266288091' post='2184030'] Jeez. Some people will use anything as an excuse to take a shot at \m/. Its just surrender terms. Chill out [/quote] What can I say? Haters gonna hate. Too bad people can't seem to come up with anything more original than "lol \m/" though. Come on, even though we're taking your tech, I'd think someone in these nations you're running can come up with something more witty. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
890765 Posted February 16, 2010 Report Share Posted February 16, 2010 Honestly, I don't think these terms are draconian in any sense of the word. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arcturus Jefferson Posted February 16, 2010 Report Share Posted February 16, 2010 [quote name='Crymson' date='15 February 2010 - 08:28 PM' timestamp='1266283718' post='2183844'] Given that you're a triumvir in the alliance that is offering the terms, can you really be depended upon to provide an impartial opinion on these terms? That said, I don't see how forcing that ridiculous soldier % term on anyone can be called fair, honorable or just, as you're almost certainly have included it only so that you will have an excuse to attack any PoWs who might mistakenly have more than 25% (perhaps you'll ZI them, as noted in term #9; that term doesn't seem so fair, honorable or just either---it certainly seems severe!). Given that one can buy his or her nation's maximum number of soldiers in all of ten seconds, what other use could that term have? [/quote] Well it's a good thing that we have expert commentary on harsh terms here from [url=http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=16985]Crymson.[/url] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newhotness Posted February 16, 2010 Report Share Posted February 16, 2010 I bet, that most of you that are using the "you must not know BAPS/Valhalla" line would would complaining about how \m/ *didnt* offer terms when the war is over. Youre just looking for a reason to talk !@#$ about/to them. But, im pretty sure \m/ doesnt expect or want any of you to accept these terms (except for the nation TJ mentioned). They only gave em to prevent you from complaining later that they didnt. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Merrie Melodies Posted February 16, 2010 Report Share Posted February 16, 2010 Whether or not a single person accepts these terms doesn't really matter. I just wish had had the same sense of humor as those who are so easily amused that an alliance policy announcement would cause them to roll about on the floor, then again it's very odd behavior for a leader of a nation at war. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Groucho Marx Posted February 16, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 16, 2010 [quote name='Merrie Melodies' date='15 February 2010 - 11:15 PM' timestamp='1266293715' post='2184414'] Whether or not a single person accepts these terms doesn't really matter. I just wish had had the same sense of humor as those who are so easily amused that an alliance policy announcement would cause them to roll about on the floor, then again it's very odd behavior for a leader of a nation at war. [/quote] I think the Radiation is starting to get to them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ImaNewbie Posted February 16, 2010 Report Share Posted February 16, 2010 Honestly guys, if you get anyone at all to surrender idividualy you can keep'em. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JT Jag Posted February 16, 2010 Report Share Posted February 16, 2010 HEY GUYS TYPICAL SURRENDER TERMS ARE SO HILARIOUS RIGHT Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alterego Posted February 16, 2010 Report Share Posted February 16, 2010 (edited) I think ill keep nuking you until I run out of nukes and money, should take another 2 months but probably more Thems my terms Edited February 16, 2010 by Alterego Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mamazlilmistake Posted February 16, 2010 Report Share Posted February 16, 2010 [quote name='wickedj' date='16 February 2010 - 12:47 AM' timestamp='1266281270' post='2183758'] BAPS was and i think still IS bigger than \m/. besides arent BAPS suppose to be awesome fighters? [/quote] [quote name='topgun0820' date='16 February 2010 - 12:46 AM' timestamp='1266281187' post='2183750'] Lol, You do not know BAPS nor Valhalla. Good luck with this... [/quote] ^^^ what he said Wickedj. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caliph Posted February 16, 2010 Report Share Posted February 16, 2010 [quote name='Alterego' date='15 February 2010 - 11:05 PM' timestamp='1266303938' post='2185120'] I think ill keep nuking you until I run out of nukes and money, should take another 2 months but probably more Thems my terms [/quote] Dude, the only \m/ nation your nuking is me I've seen your warchest, and at your current infra level it should last a while. The only thing you have to worry about is staying above 1k infra to send off those nukes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nobody Expects Posted February 16, 2010 Report Share Posted February 16, 2010 I, Nobody Expects of BAPS, hereby reject these surrender terms, you can however surrender to me by changing your AA to BAPS Gimp. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Biain Posted February 16, 2010 Report Share Posted February 16, 2010 [quote name='Nobody Expects' date='16 February 2010 - 09:53 AM' timestamp='1266314021' post='2185330'] I, Nobody Expects of BAPS, hereby reject these surrender terms, you can however surrender to me by changing your AA to BAPS Gimp. [/quote] We'll also accept "BAPS kicks \m/'s arse" "BAPS are so much cooler then \m/" and "\m/ fails at surrender terms". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starfox101 Posted February 16, 2010 Report Share Posted February 16, 2010 [quote name='Jonesing' date='16 February 2010 - 02:43 AM' timestamp='1266288210' post='2184037'] LOL, \m/ really are clueless as to who they're fighting, they'll learn soon enough... but thanks for this thread though, I now know who I'm gonna be asking to be sent when I get out of peace and back to work growing my casualty count. Let's just hope I don't get turtles!!! [/quote] Well, that's pretty funny. A guy posturing from peace mode. Yeah, you're really scaring us. [quote name='ImaNewbie' date='16 February 2010 - 07:00 AM' timestamp='1266303629' post='2185107'] Honestly guys, if you get anyone at all to surrender idividualy you can keep'em. [/quote] I like that you threw in "individually," because it's only a matter of time. [quote name='Biain' date='16 February 2010 - 10:02 AM' timestamp='1266314539' post='2185335'] We'll also accept "BAPS kicks \m/'s arse" "BAPS are so much cooler then \m/" and "\m/ fails at surrender terms". [/quote] Wow, you're really clever. BAPS should make you their Minister of Propaganda so you can come up with some more golden stuff. BAPS, you are good fighters, but you don't do the trash talking game well at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nobody Expects Posted February 16, 2010 Report Share Posted February 16, 2010 The very idea that anyone in BAPS would surrender individually is laughable, you have to let us have a fun with this Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huang Ti Posted February 16, 2010 Report Share Posted February 16, 2010 (edited) [quote name='Newhotness' date='16 February 2010 - 03:39 AM' timestamp='1266291588' post='2184267'] I bet, that most of you that are using the "you must not know BAPS/Valhalla" line would would complaining about how \m/ *didnt* offer terms when the war is over. Youre just looking for a reason to talk !@#$ about/to them. But, im pretty sure \m/ doesnt expect or want any of you to accept these terms (except for the nation TJ mentioned). They only gave em to prevent you from complaining later that they didnt. [/quote] This thread was bleh until this post. So i guess... thanks \m/??? PS, we have bigger warchests/more tech/more war wonders/tigher knit community than you But thanks! \edit\ Also Val arent too bad either \edit2\ I, Huang Ti, of BAPS hereby reject these terms. Edited February 16, 2010 by Huang Ti Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Pansy Posted February 16, 2010 Report Share Posted February 16, 2010 Good show \m/, seriously well done. Still, not the smartest of choice's to offer terms too Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bacharth Posted February 16, 2010 Report Share Posted February 16, 2010 It's good that they're offering surrender terms. Sometimes the best things can come out of surrender :v, like freedom. Also, these are only the opinions of the Republic of Distopya, blah blah, of course. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
supersystem Posted February 16, 2010 Report Share Posted February 16, 2010 (edited) BAPS surrendering LOL. The only problem we have in BAPS right now is that we can't declare in anarchy Edited February 16, 2010 by supersystem Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arentak Posted February 16, 2010 Report Share Posted February 16, 2010 (edited) [quote]since their leadership believes they can fight a losing war forever.[/quote] The moral is to the physical as three is to one\ Edited February 16, 2010 by arentak Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starfox101 Posted February 16, 2010 Report Share Posted February 16, 2010 (edited) [quote name='supersystem' date='16 February 2010 - 10:49 AM' timestamp='1266317387' post='2185368'] BAPS surrendering LOL. The only problem we have in BAPS right now is that we can't declare in anarchy [/quote] Purple is winning this war, clearly. Edited February 16, 2010 by Starfox101 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sigelopisan Posted February 16, 2010 Report Share Posted February 16, 2010 /m\ can claim a victory if having 1 BAPS nation surrender. o/BAPS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.