jesse james Posted February 13, 2010 Report Share Posted February 13, 2010 I know there was another topic brought up a few days ago on this subject [url="http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=80538"]here[/url] And it said it should be fixed, but I have been spied 3 times now. I am not sure if one of them was a fake or not but if it isn't the issue should be fixed. here is a screen shot of it [IMG]http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g49/cruiserjd1/3spyoperations.jpg[/IMG] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Locke Posted February 13, 2010 Report Share Posted February 13, 2010 [quote name='jesse james' date='13 February 2010 - 12:25 PM' timestamp='1266081939' post='2179375'] I know there was another topic brought up a few days ago on this subject [url="http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=80538"]here[/url] And it said it should be fixed, but I have been spied 3 times now. I am not sure if one of them was a fake or not but if it isn't the issue should be fixed. here is a screen shot of it [IMG]http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g49/cruiserjd1/3spyoperations.jpg[/IMG] [/quote] You can check for fakes by seeing if it matches with this: http://www.cybernations.net/spies_information.asp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jesse james Posted February 13, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 13, 2010 [quote name='Locke' date='13 February 2010 - 09:30 AM' timestamp='1266082222' post='2179383'] You can check for fakes by seeing if it matches with this: http://www.cybernations.net/spies_information.asp [/quote] no it wasnt a fake, so then there is a bug i guess Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Count Rupert Posted February 13, 2010 Report Share Posted February 13, 2010 [quote name='Locke' date='13 February 2010 - 12:30 PM' timestamp='1266082222' post='2179383'] You can check for fakes by seeing if it matches with this: http://www.cybernations.net/spies_information.asp [/quote] Not sure how checking your own spy operations is going to determine whether someone is sending you fake spy operation messages or not which is all the link you provided shows. The fact is one of those is a fake message. The two indicating unknown sender are real. The fact it's by an unknown sender tells us that a spy op was conducted and the attacker was not discovered. That leaves the remaining one to determine if it's real or not since it shows the sender of the message. The very fact that it shows the sender means if it were a real message that he conducted a spy op and was discovered. That however would mean that Jesse James' alliance Rome's listing of discovered spy ops would have this one on it's list. It does not so it has to be a fake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Locke Posted February 13, 2010 Report Share Posted February 13, 2010 [quote name='Count Rupert' date='13 February 2010 - 01:45 PM' timestamp='1266086742' post='2179483'] Not sure how checking your own spy operations is going to determine whether someone is sending you fake spy operation messages or not which is all the link you provided shows. The fact is one of those is a fake message. The two indicating unknown sender are real. The fact it's by an unknown sender tells us that a spy op was conducted and the attacker was not discovered. That leaves the remaining one to determine if it's real or not since it shows the sender of the message. The very fact that it shows the sender means if it were a real message that he conducted a spy op and was discovered. That however would mean that Jesse James' alliance Rome's listing of discovered spy ops would have this one on it's list. It does not so it has to be a fake. [/quote] Ah, wrong link, that'll teach me to think while tired. <.< This would be the correct one: http://www.cybernations.net/search_spies.asp?searchstring=Declaring_User%2CDeclaring_User&search=BlaZeAzZ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
admin Posted February 13, 2010 Report Share Posted February 13, 2010 You thwarted that last spy operation so I won't take any action there. I made another code change that should stop this... hopefully. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Shepard Posted February 15, 2010 Report Share Posted February 15, 2010 [quote name='Count Rupert' date='13 February 2010 - 06:45 PM' timestamp='1266086742' post='2179483'] Not sure how checking your own spy operations is going to determine whether someone is sending you fake spy operation messages or not which is all the link you provided shows. The fact is one of those is a fake message. The two indicating unknown sender are real. The fact it's by an unknown sender tells us that a spy op was conducted and the attacker was not discovered. That leaves the remaining one to determine if it's real or not since it shows the sender of the message. The very fact that it shows the sender means if it were a real message that he conducted a spy op and was discovered. That however would mean that Jesse James' alliance Rome's listing of discovered spy ops would have this one on it's list. It does not so it has to be a fake. [/quote] Yeah the spy op does appear here: http://www.cybernations.net/search_spies.asp?searchstring=Declaring_User%2CDeclaring_User&search=BlaZeAzZ At 12:07:28, which matches the time the message appeared in the inbox. The 2nd and 3rd ops can't be fake so this was an occurance of 3 in a day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anakey Posted February 21, 2010 Report Share Posted February 21, 2010 (edited) made a mistake Edited February 21, 2010 by Anakey Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts