Lord GVChamp Posted February 6, 2010 Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 Still no hate from Polar here. Tough spot, unorthodox solution, whatever floats your boat. Just...ya know...keep your treaties clean in the future Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
watchman Posted February 6, 2010 Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 Wow, just wow. Pathetic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mind Virus Posted February 6, 2010 Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 [quote name='Bilrow' date='05 February 2010 - 09:55 PM' timestamp='1265435736' post='2163321'] This has got to be one of the most craziest things ever. Good Job Archon and Grub on killing Polar. [/quote] I heard Grub was still working as an NAAC Operative. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balder Posted February 6, 2010 Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 [quote name='Duncan King' date='06 February 2010 - 12:46 AM' timestamp='1265435161' post='2163232'] And with that, Polaris completes its triple double cross. I sincerely hope that the next Emperor will have the integrity to choose one side and stick with it. I also sincerely doubt that the cries of MK and GR were that urgent. They are, in fact, on the winning side of a curbstomp. [/quote] I really, really, really don't like you. I'm sure the feeling is mutual. However, you're exactly right and I feel the same way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Desperado Posted February 6, 2010 Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 [quote name='Seerow' date='06 February 2010 - 12:55 AM' timestamp='1265435729' post='2163318'] And why should we let an alliance that aggressively and preemptively attacked us with no CB at all off the hook just like that? If you want surrender terms I don't think we'd be happy with any term that leaves TOP/IRON sitting with a nation above 1k tech just yet. [/quote] I knew you wouldn't let everyone down. Setting new records every day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tashees2 Posted February 6, 2010 Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 i guess NpO wants to win no matter what Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
USMC123 Posted February 6, 2010 Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 I heard rumors of this and dismissed them. Polar couldn't possibly do something so dim. Nice to see Grub trying to go out with a bang though >_> I pray this doesn't become a new trend in CN. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hiro Nakara Posted February 6, 2010 Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 Thats what I call a C-C-Combo Breaker. You crazy people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ding Dong Posted February 6, 2010 Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 Did Polar just accidently themselves? Good luck to whoever makes the war web Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Desperado Posted February 6, 2010 Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 [quote name='Sal Paradise' date='06 February 2010 - 12:59 AM' timestamp='1265435986' post='2163371'] Oh you're all scratching your heads now, but what you don't realize is that this is the first move in executing the triple break off flank attack. [/quote] Battalion would be proud. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raiizn Posted February 6, 2010 Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 I hope Polar is ready to live with the consequences of this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emperor Mccole Posted February 6, 2010 Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 good luck polar. i sincerely mean it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mhawk Posted February 6, 2010 Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 [quote name='TheNeverender' date='05 February 2010 - 09:55 PM' timestamp='1265435708' post='2163317'] No, probably not, but then they'd have a mostly-fully intact upper tier and we would have nothing even close to that. Pairing that with the statements made by Crymson of his desire to "bloody SF and C&G" and the reasonable assumption that TOP will be gunning for MK in the future, and peacing out at the current moment would be a horrible long-term decision for the safety of C&G and her allies. Simple mechanics, really. [/quote] Your reasoning is sound, please stick with it instead of your other comment making it sound like MK was under threat of complete destruction. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bakamitai Posted February 6, 2010 Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 Grub: if you wanted to go out with a bang, you could at least not make everyone hate your membership by association. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seerow Posted February 6, 2010 Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 [quote name='Desperado' date='06 February 2010 - 01:00 AM' timestamp='1265436036' post='2163384'] I knew you wouldn't let everyone down. Setting new records every day. [/quote] Well like Archon explained, peacing out now leaves TOP with a full upper tier in tact and MK hurting pretty badly. If we continue on longer, that evens out until we hold the advantage. Until that point is reached, if they want to surrender terms would have to be crushing for us to consider them, or else we effectively lose. Would terms actually be signed saying all TOP members must have under 1k tech? No almost certainly not. But it would have to be something close if you want peace today rather than fighting it out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pablo Monkey Posted February 6, 2010 Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 Why would a "good" ally make a request of an alliance already involved in so many wars. This is the way allies are supposed to treat each other? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The AUT Posted February 6, 2010 Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 [quote name='Sal Paradise' date='06 February 2010 - 05:59 AM' timestamp='1265435986' post='2163371'] Oh you're all scratching your heads now, but what you don't realize is that this is the first move in executing the triple break off flank attack. [/quote] This truly is the greatest comment of all time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mhawk Posted February 6, 2010 Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 (edited) [quote name='Seerow' date='05 February 2010 - 10:04 PM' timestamp='1265436284' post='2163411'] Well like Archon explained, peacing out now leaves TOP with a full upper tier in tact and MK hurting pretty badly. If we continue on longer, that evens out until we hold the advantage. Until that point is reached, if they want to surrender terms would have to be crushing for us to consider them, or else we effectively lose. Would terms actually be signed saying all TOP members must have under 1k tech? No almost certainly not. But it would have to be something close if you want peace today rather than fighting it out. [/quote] I suspect MK will have to explain hard why alliances months from now unrelated to you directly must continue taking nukes so MK can "hold the advantage" over TOP. Edited February 6, 2010 by mhawk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Homura Posted February 6, 2010 Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 I believe this is the definition of triple break-off flank attack. I'm amused. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joracy Posted February 6, 2010 Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 [quote name='bakamitai' date='06 February 2010 - 01:04 AM' timestamp='1265436245' post='2163408'] Grub: if you wanted to go out with a bang, you could at least not make everyone hate your membership by association. [/quote] I don't hate Polars membership. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adrian LaCroix Posted February 6, 2010 Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 This war isn't even trying to make any sense anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ecthelion Posted February 6, 2010 Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 Welcome to Cybernations kids! Where the national plant is the Face Palm! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archon Posted February 6, 2010 Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 [quote name='mhawk' date='06 February 2010 - 01:06 AM' timestamp='1265436384' post='2163424'] I suspect MK will have to explain hard why alliances months from now unrelated to you directly must continue taking nukes so MK can "hold the advantage" over TOP. [/quote] Months from now I have no idea where we'll be, but if people are taking nukes, MK will be at the forefront of it. Assuming our nations are still capable of warfare. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sal Paradise Posted February 6, 2010 Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 [quote name='Katsumi' date='05 February 2010 - 10:06 PM' timestamp='1265436388' post='2163425'] I believe this is the definition of triple break-off flank attack. I'm amused. [/quote] I believe this is the definition of plagiarism. http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=80158&view=findpost&p=2163371 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silver Empress Posted February 6, 2010 Report Share Posted February 6, 2010 Official division by zero. o/ Polaris. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts