Ivan Moldavi Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 Yeah being that I'm a high ranking government official and all.~ Even if MK sits on the sideline it doesn't take a genius to foresee the pounding you are going to take from FOK's allies. Indeed. That is why they declared on Polar and bypassed us completely just a few minutes ago. I fully expect, just as most of my alliance does, to take a beating in this war. But I don't care, because I know that those on the other side will take a beating as well, and I like our odds for being on the "side" that takes less of one overall. The NSO is not full of stat collectors that feel the need to treaty everyone in the Cyberverse in order to prevent any damage to our precious infrastructure. We will burn, but we will not burn alone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivan Moldavi Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 If it is are you going to send Corinan in to toss around threats he'll never follow up on? Yes, because that makes perfect sense in the context of the fact that my alliance went to war just a little while ago while your guns remain silent. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Jackson Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 wow your side of the web is trying really hard to escelate this. BRING IT. What's wrong? Getting a little more than you bargained for? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief Savage Man Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 All glory to the Stickmen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jens of the desert Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 Hail stickies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snowbeast Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 (edited) Indeed. That is why they declared on Polar and bypassed us completely just a few minutes ago. I fully expect, just as most of my alliance does, to take a beating in this war. But I don't care, because I know that those on the other side will take a beating as well, and I like our odds for being on the "side" that takes less of one overall. The NSO is not full of stat collectors that feel the need to treaty everyone in the Cyberverse in order to prevent any damage to our precious infrastructure. We will burn, but we will not burn alone. I'm not referring to your alliance's resolve to fight but rather it's ability. Also MK on NSO would be a huge waste. Edited January 25, 2010 by Snowbeast Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheEraser Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 Yes, because that makes perfect sense in the context of the fact that my alliance went to war just a little while ago while your guns remain silent. Comrade he is in dark fist things like logic and intelligence are forbidden over there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HurricaneLOL Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 o/ Stickmen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flak attack Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 Indeed. That is why they declared on Polar and bypassed us completely just a few minutes ago. I fully expect, just as most of my alliance does, to take a beating in this war. But I don't care, because I know that those on the other side will take a beating as well, and I like our odds for being on the "side" that takes less of one overall. The NSO is not full of stat collectors that feel the need to treaty everyone in the Cyberverse in order to prevent any damage to our precious infrastructure. We will burn, but we will not burn alone. I see you're as much a strategic genius as always Ivan. It should be easy to see how the cards are being played here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krath Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 i say we should call this the Second Unjust war, just to tick good ol'Ivan off. he doesn't want it named that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Molleh Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 Stickmen, next time you DoW someone, make sure it works out so I can nuke Bob, kthnx. Besides that, being a former SLCB member, it's gonna be a reunion. Koel, imbored24470 <3 But why couldn't you have been in my range?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
President S O Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 I hope each and every one of you is totally and utterly destroyed. Oh and o/ Polaris I like you. o/ Polaris. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Stark Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 Stickmen o/ Your blitz's owned NSO's. Just sayin. Give 'em Hell Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivan Moldavi Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 I'm not referring to your alliance's resolve to fight but rather it's ability. Also MK on NSO would be a huge waste. Being a relatively young and small alliance does have its disadvantages when it comes to warfare. Although I would rather lead an alliance of 50 poorly trained nations with resolve than one of 400 nations without it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SonOfHoward Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 (edited) my blitz was lolz. off to bed! o/ my wingmen! Edited January 25, 2010 by SonOfHoward Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivan Moldavi Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 Stickmen o/ Your blitz's owned NSO's. Just sayin. Give 'em Hell Indeed. An alliance (three alliances overall) with a much higher average NS found more targets available to them against an alliance of over 400 nations. What a surprise. For all the talk from your leadership in private about wishing to remain neutral and complaining about Polar getting involved in \m/'s business you MK people sure do like to spout off about things that don't concern you. Hypocrisy is not surprising. The lack of a declaration to back it up is somewhat. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NationRuler Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 Onward, Stickmen! o/ \m/ o/ Poison Clan o/ FOK! o/ iFOK o/ SLCB o/ FCO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spaarlaamp Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 Yay us! We will prevail! o/ Stickmen! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Stark Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 Being a relatively young and small alliance does have its disadvantages when it comes to warfare. Although I would rather lead an alliance of 50 poorly trained nations with resolve than one of 400 nations without it. I believe Ivan has managed to accuse MK of being stat collectors and being without resolve. I don't think it is MK that has a problem with the history books... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krath Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 Yay us! We will prevail! o/ Stickmen! YES WE WILL o/ they went too far this time! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivan Moldavi Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 I believe Ivan has managed to accuse MK of being stat collectors and being without resolve. I don't think it is MK that has a problem with the history books... No, my memory is quite good. It took MK two years to build up the resolve to do what it did in the last big war, and I believe that was your very first win ever. Good job. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivan Moldavi Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 I see you're as much a strategic genius as always Ivan. It should be easy to see how the cards are being played here. Oh, I know what is happening. That is why I am goading them. But, it doesn't matter. I might have a surprise or two left in me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shafer Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 No, my memory is quite good. It took MK two years to build up the resolve to do what it did in the last big war, and I believe that was your very first win ever. Good job. That doesn't make any sense. MK fought in a number of wars and Karma was the first victory. That in itself means they were not just collecting stats because they were willing to sacrifice their alliance on multiple occasions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarriorConcept Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 No, my memory is quite good. It took MK two years to build up the resolve to do what it did in the last big war, and I believe that was your very first win ever. Good job. I believe MK fought quite a few wars in those 2 years that took quite a bit of a resolve to fight. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Gorba Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 o/ iFOK o/ Stickmen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.