Daikos Posted January 20, 2010 Report Share Posted January 20, 2010 Honorable: Gramlins Immoral: \m/ Amoral: \m/ Isolated: Grey Council Entangled: MK Powerful: TOP Incompetent: GGA Nice: FOK Mean: NPO Friend: this ones a tie between Fark and Aircastle. I <3 them both. Enemy: NSO Respected: Umbrella Annoying: NSO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivan Moldavi Posted January 20, 2010 Report Share Posted January 20, 2010 Honorable: GramlinsImmoral: \m/ Amoral: \m/ Isolated: Grey Council Entangled: MK Powerful: TOP Incompetent: GGA Nice: FOK Mean: NPO Friend: this ones a tie between Fark and Aircastle. I <3 them both. Enemy: NSO Respected: Umbrella Annoying: NSO If we were actually your enemy then you would have declared when you had the opportunity. Also, can an alliance be immoral and amoral at the same time? Wouldn't the latter, if true, preclude the possibility of the first? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daikos Posted January 20, 2010 Report Share Posted January 20, 2010 (edited) If we were actually your enemy then you would have declared when you had the opportunity. Also, can an alliance be immoral and amoral at the same time? Wouldn't the latter, if true, preclude the possibility of the first? \m/ can. It's part of their plan to ruin the game. EDIT: I was going to just ignore the first sentence of yours since I don't want to see this thread derailed but I'm bored so here we go. Dark Fist doesn't go around declaring on alliances without a legitimate IC reason, no matter how much we dislike them. And I guess you and your alliance are the only ones who are allowed to not go to war until you feel that you have the tactical advantage or that the conditions are perfect? Edited January 20, 2010 by Daikos Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivan Moldavi Posted January 20, 2010 Report Share Posted January 20, 2010 \m/ can. It's part of their plan to ruin the game. Some people just don't plan well... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daikos Posted January 20, 2010 Report Share Posted January 20, 2010 Some people just don't plan well... On this, I can certainly agree with you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Louis the II Posted January 20, 2010 Report Share Posted January 20, 2010 Poor PR and being disliked by some people are not necessarily the same thing. You are right. Is part of the NSO propaganda to look mean and sarcastic (the dark side off course). And yes you guys do this really well. However, this has its price, you can see here that most people dislike NSO. I know you don't care (I actually don't care that you don't care). The only point that I am making is NSO will always have more enemies because the "persona" the AA have chosen. I am not talking about morals, but what is a natural consequence. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivan Moldavi Posted January 20, 2010 Report Share Posted January 20, 2010 You are right. Is part of the NSO propaganda to look mean and sarcastic (the dark side off course). And yes you guys do this really well. However, this has its price, you can see here that most people dislike NSO. I know you don't care (I actually don't care that you don't care). The only point that I am making is NSO will always have more enemies because the "persona" the AA have chosen. I am not talking about morals, but what is a natural consequence. Ah, but I disagree with your ultimate assessment. Being disliked isn't the same as being an enemy. A lot of wars have been fought where people that generally dislike one another are on the same side. Those that based their diplomacy on the personality traits of the other alliances instead of potential military or political benefits are doing it wrong, in my opinion. Also, in response to Daikos' edit, the NSO fights when it needs or wants to fight, not necessarily based solely on statistical calculations. I believe our most recent potential conflagration was with an alliance larger and more experienced than us. That was hardly a positive numerical position. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Louis the II Posted January 20, 2010 Report Share Posted January 20, 2010 Ah, but I disagree with your ultimate assessment. Being disliked isn't the same as being an enemy. A lot of wars have been fought where people that generally dislike one another are on the same side. Those that based their diplomacy on the personality traits of the other alliances instead of potential military or political benefits are doing it wrong, in my opinion.Also, in response to Daikos' edit, the NSO fights when it needs or wants to fight, not necessarily based solely on statistical calculations. I believe our most recent potential conflagration was with an alliance larger and more experienced than us. That was hardly a positive numerical position. Your response is making sense and you are being nice and polite...wait..? You are the leader of NSO.. I am so confused... best wishes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hyperion321 Posted January 20, 2010 Report Share Posted January 20, 2010 I honestly have no idea what you're referring to. ya. !@#$@#$. right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Boris Posted January 20, 2010 Report Share Posted January 20, 2010 Honourable: FEAR Immoral: Athens Amoral: NSO Isolated: GPA Entangled: Too many to list Powerful: TOP Incompetent: ODN Nice: TOOL Mean: FOK Friend: FEAR Enemy: Many I don't get along with, but not enough to count them as 'enemies' Respected: MK Annoying: VE Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daikos Posted January 20, 2010 Report Share Posted January 20, 2010 Also, in response to Daikos' edit, the NSO fights when it needs or wants to fight, not necessarily based solely on statistical calculations. I believe our most recent potential conflagration was with an alliance larger and more experienced than us. That was hardly a positive numerical position. Which would explain why we didn't declare. Glad we've gone in this fun little circle and worked things out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Watson895 Posted January 20, 2010 Report Share Posted January 20, 2010 Well, it's time to pick a random target then. I'll smash my number pad, and NSO attacks the alliance ranked that number. By NS of course. Damn new systems. 65 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
defroster Posted January 20, 2010 Report Share Posted January 20, 2010 Honourable: TOP Immoral: ROK Amoral: \m/ Isolated: Grey Council Entangled: Sparta Powerful: NpO Incompetent: Zenith Nice: FCC Mean: STA Friend: MK Enemy: None Respected: Umbrella Annoying: NSO That's right all of None is an enemy of Umbrella, you heard it here first. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TehChron Posted January 20, 2010 Report Share Posted January 20, 2010 ya. !@#$@#$. right. Feel free to check my post history, or use the handy-dandy search function to validate your persecution complex. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maoze Posted January 21, 2010 Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 Honourable: GOD ...moral: moral? I'm sick of it. Isolated: GPA Entangled: IRON Powerful: NpO Incompetent: GGA Nice: RIA Mean: \m/ Friend: VE Enemy: ADI Respected: R&R Annoying: echelon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mdnss69 Posted January 22, 2010 Report Share Posted January 22, 2010 (edited) If we were actually your enemy then you would have declared when you had the opportunity. Also, can an alliance be immoral and amoral at the same time? Wouldn't the latter, if true, preclude the possibility of the first? Confusing: NSO Edited January 22, 2010 by mdnss69 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.