Subtleknifewielder Posted January 14, 2010 Report Share Posted January 14, 2010 ***Classified*** Sigh. The twenty thousand men and women, 500 Special Forces operatives among them, departed, escorted by an Aircraft carrier, a destroyer, and three submarines. It would be a long trip, but they would get there sooner or later. OOC: Wait, Lavo, don't you have a canal linking the Mediterranean Sea to the Red Sea? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subtleknifewielder Posted January 14, 2010 Report Share Posted January 14, 2010 Sure they do, back down, remove your forces and shut the hell up. No, that would cause them to lose too much face. At least, that's probably how they are thinking. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Il Terra Di Agea Posted January 14, 2010 Report Share Posted January 14, 2010 OOC: I'd like to direct some attention to this thread please. Ideally I'm hoping it may be able to clarify the situation OOC so we can sort through everything else IC in a slightly more streamlined fashion. I'll be doing a more in depth IC post when I get home. Thank you Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justinian the Mighty Posted January 14, 2010 Report Share Posted January 14, 2010 Sure they do, back down, remove your forces and shut the hell up. Some nations need to stop puffing up their chests like what they say is actually relevant to the situation. -The Ruskies Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Voodoo Nova Posted January 14, 2010 Report Share Posted January 14, 2010 Sure they do, back down, remove your forces and shut the hell up. "I believe we can just call you ignorant and ignore you from this point and unto perpetuity." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael McBride Posted January 14, 2010 Report Share Posted January 14, 2010 OOC: http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=78349 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lavo Posted January 14, 2010 Report Share Posted January 14, 2010 OOC: Wait, Lavo, don't you have a canal linking the Mediterranean Sea to the Red Sea? OOC: You mean the Suez Canal? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subtleknifewielder Posted January 14, 2010 Report Share Posted January 14, 2010 OOC: You mean the Suez Canal? OOC: Yeah, i think so. What's the biggest ship that'll allow passage for? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lavo Posted January 14, 2010 Report Share Posted January 14, 2010 OOC: Yeah, i think so. What's the biggest ship that'll allow passage for? OOC: It can fit CVs through it, so they can all pass through. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Californian Posted January 14, 2010 Report Share Posted January 14, 2010 (edited) The Slavorussian government finds this logic to be flawed. Evidence supports that fact that Grøenlandian government was preparing to bandwagon a war started by their allies in Nordland despite not having the necessary treaties or any prior contact with Slavorussia merely for the reason of stealing a Russian city away from Russians and deporting them from their country. You had every intention to invade us if we hadn’t surrendered.You were rewarded for your complicity and for being a good little puppet, with territory on Russia’s northern coast, but when the opportunity arose to repair relations with Slavorussia and return the city to the rightful owners you didn’t do it. But that‘s not the point. Military bases in territories like Arkhangelsk or Equador, are needed to defend the population from invasion. The point is that Louisiana's purely military outpost in Europe serves no purpose besides to giving an American country a foothold in Europe to go who knows what. Mr. Justinian, the work of your propaganda corps never ceases to amaze me. The FRG had no intention to join that particular war, we specifically stated our neutrality. Mind disclosing any of your fabricated evidence for your incorrect assumptions? We also didn't deport any citizens as much as you might like to think. Any unhappy citizen is allowed to leave, we do not move people against their will. As for repairing relations, we indeed gave 99% of our Russia holdings back to the the Slavic Empire which held the surrounding area. We also maintained good relations with them. Since taking the land you have acted nothing but hostile to us, why on Earth would we give the city to a nation that hates our guts? OOC:Edit: Fixed name. Edited January 14, 2010 by Californian Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Il Terra Di Agea Posted January 14, 2010 Report Share Posted January 14, 2010 As for repairing relations, we indeed gave 99% of our Russia holdings back to the the Slavic Kingdom which held the surrounding area. We also maintained good relations with them. Since taking the land you have acted nothing but hostile to us, why on Earth would we give the city to a nation that hates our guts? "Two men stand in a room; One holding a gun to the other's head. The man with the gun pressing into his temple yells 'WHY?! Why are you doing this to me? Why are you threatening to shoot me?!' The man with the guns replies, 'I wouldn't be holding the gun against your head if you weren't holding that knife to my throat!'" "Hostility begets Hostility.If you gave up the city, the hostility would likely end, but you refuse because the nation is being hostile." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Californian Posted January 14, 2010 Report Share Posted January 14, 2010 "Two men stand in a room; One holding a gun to the other's head. The man with the gun pressing into his temple yells 'WHY?! Why are you doing this to me? Why are you threatening to shoot me?!' The man with the guns replies, 'I wouldn't be holding the gun against your head if you weren't holding that knife to my throat!'""Hostility begets Hostility.If you gave up the city, the hostility would likely end, but you refuse because the nation is being hostile." We no longer own the city. Learn to map read before commenting and making silly analogies please. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subtleknifewielder Posted January 14, 2010 Report Share Posted January 14, 2010 OOC: It can fit CVs through it, so they can all pass through. OOC: Excellent. "Two men stand in a room; One holding a gun to the other's head. The man with the gun pressing into his temple yells 'WHY?! Why are you doing this to me? Why are you threatening to shoot me?!' The man with the guns replies, 'I wouldn't be holding the gun against your head if you weren't holding that knife to my throat!'""Hostility begets Hostility.If you gave up the city, the hostility would likely end, but you refuse because the nation is being hostile." "...that's an interesting way of putting it..." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justinian the Mighty Posted January 14, 2010 Report Share Posted January 14, 2010 Mr. Justinian, the work of your propaganda corps never ceases to amaze me. The FRG had no intention to join that particular war, we specifically stated our neutrality. Mind disclosing any of your fabricated evidence for your incorrect assumptions? We also didn't deport any citizens as much as you might like to think. Any unhappy citizen is allowed to leave, we do not move people against their will. As for repairing relations, we indeed gave 99% of our Russia holdings back to the the Slavic Empire which held the surrounding area. We also maintained good relations with them. Since taking the land you have acted nothing but hostile to us, why on Earth would we give the city to a nation that hates our guts? OOC:Edit: Fixed name. Please, it’s impolite to address the Emperor by his first name without using his proper title or rank. However that’s far less important than whom you should be addressing, it isn’t His Majesty that you should be addressing, it’s Prime Minister Medvedev, or the government in general since they released the statement. As far as our “fabricated evidence” as you call it, all you have to do is look to your statements made during the war to see that you were getting ready for war. If Nordheim asked you were ready to bandwagon an aggressive war against Slavorussia, thereby playing the good puppet state and acquiring some territory. We’re not going to drag up the legitimacy of the Slavic Empire’s territorial right but we will refute your claim that we’ve been nothing but belligerent to the FRG. When a nation shows belligerence do they allow open borders with an enclave city within it’s borders? Do the allow the free desemination of ideals, goods and culture to flow between that border? Do they allow troops and military equipment to be transported to that city for it’s defense from the first nation? No they do not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
V The King Posted January 14, 2010 Report Share Posted January 14, 2010 (edited) A short statement from the Ministry Of Foreign Affairs "While we will not specifically support any side, we will merely state that Viniland will not allow any European troops to set foot in the Americas and will militarily support Louisiana if that be the case. If you want to take the war somewhere other than Europe then you probably shouldn't." Edited January 14, 2010 by V The King Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uberstein Posted January 14, 2010 Report Share Posted January 14, 2010 (edited) A short statement from the Ministry Of Foreign Affairs"While we will not specifically support any side, we will merely state that Viniland will not allow any European troops to set foot in the Americas and will militarily support Louisiana if that be the case. If you want to take the war somewhere other than Europe then you probably shouldn't." "This war is simply to remove Louisiana from Europe. We have no interest in touching their American assets" Edited January 14, 2010 by BaronUberstein Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Executive Minister Posted January 14, 2010 Report Share Posted January 14, 2010 "This was is simply to remove Louisiana from Europe. We have no interest in touching their American assets" OOC: This line is probably the closest I've ever come to sigging a post. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uberstein Posted January 14, 2010 Report Share Posted January 14, 2010 OOC: This line is probably the closest I've ever come to sigging a post. OOC: Why? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael McBride Posted January 14, 2010 Report Share Posted January 14, 2010 OOC: Why? OOC: Sexual inurendo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Executive Minister Posted January 14, 2010 Report Share Posted January 14, 2010 (edited) OOC: Why? OOC: Sexual inurendo. OOC: You're both kidding, right? Edited January 14, 2010 by Executive Minister Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uberstein Posted January 14, 2010 Report Share Posted January 14, 2010 OOC: You're both kidding, right? OOC: Nope, I'm completely and utterly confused. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.