D34th Posted January 3, 2010 Report Share Posted January 3, 2010 Yeah... he missed update. Which actually made me cry. All the guys who were anarchied did. Either way, you'll get your tech. If I have to send it for him I will. No worries, I can wait. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schattenmann Posted January 3, 2010 Report Share Posted January 3, 2010 (edited) I'll see you around. I'm certain that as long as Nueva Vida supports spying, incompetence, and hee-hawing pre-emptive strikes that, yes, the chances we see each other around will remain high. While Browncoats, CoJ and others cooly played- and planned-out a war, the rabidly anti-BC 57th Overlanders fell all over themselves and got their fannies paddled. And while you act cute with quotes, you might disclose I was very luckily not involved in peace talks. And if 57th Overlanders is in the business of declaring war on anyone they think has designs of harm on them, they'd better adopt TPF's 24/7 DefCon1 policies. Edited January 3, 2010 by Schattenmann Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wickedj Posted January 3, 2010 Report Share Posted January 3, 2010 I'm certain that as long as Nueva Vida supports spying, incompetence, and hee-hawing pre-emptive strikes that, yes, the chances we see each other around will remain high. While Browncoats, CoJ and others cooly played- and planned-out a war, the rabidly anti-BC 57th Overlanders fell all over themselves and got their fannies paddled.And while you act cute with quotes, you might disclose I was very luckily not involved in peace talks. And if 57th Overlanders is in the business of declaring war on anyone they think has designs of harm on them, they'd better adopt TPF's 24/7 DefCon1 policies. Oh you crazy kids these days Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sargun II Posted January 3, 2010 Report Share Posted January 3, 2010 (edited) This is the fourth !@#$@#$ time that I've been told war is on or off. Goddamnit, Schatt, you infuriate me faster than men's volleyball. Now that I've actually read the thread and found out Schatt wasn't on, Goddamnit, Schatt, be on more. Edited January 3, 2010 by Sargun Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ragnor Posted January 3, 2010 Report Share Posted January 3, 2010 I'm certain that as long as Nueva Vida supports spying, incompetence, and hee-hawing pre-emptive strikes that, yes, the chances we see each other around will remain high. While Browncoats, CoJ and others cooly played- and planned-out a war, the rabidly anti-BC 57th Overlanders fell all over themselves and got their fannies paddled.And while you act cute with quotes, you might disclose I was very luckily not involved in peace talks. And if 57th Overlanders is in the business of declaring war on anyone they think has designs of harm on them, they'd better adopt TPF's 24/7 DefCon1 policies. Had you been there you would have been the only person who believed that spying had occurred. As for the rest of that post, it's is simply PR. Good day to you sir. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilsquirrel Posted January 3, 2010 Report Share Posted January 3, 2010 (edited) cheese Edited January 4, 2010 by evilsquirrel Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Chosen One Posted January 3, 2010 Report Share Posted January 3, 2010 Congratulations on bringing this all to a peaceful resolution. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Groucho Marx Posted January 3, 2010 Report Share Posted January 3, 2010 RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE Congratulations I guess. I was looking forward to some GLOBAL WOAR though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neuronia Posted January 3, 2010 Report Share Posted January 3, 2010 (edited) I love how even when a declaration of peace is made people cant help but talk crap. Our butts kicked??? Last I checked the 57th still stands so obviously you didnt do a good enough job. Yeah so some of us got sent into anarchy. Here's a cookie. Peace was declared and it didnt turn global. Sorry world! When white peace is declared, technically nobody wins. However, I think I'm quoting Kodiak, a government official in the 57th Overlanders, exactly when I say "We intend to ZI Browncoats." That objective has not been achieved. On the other hand, the defenders of Browncoats were called in by protectorates and defense pacts. If Browncoats' total NS difference between a few days ago and today is any indication, their defenders have succeeded in "protecting" (protectorate agreement) and "defending" (MDP, ODP, etc.) them. So who won? As I said before, white peace means nobody "won", but rather everyone decided to stop fighting. However, only one side achieved their stated objectives. Edited January 3, 2010 by Neuronia Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poyplemonkeys Posted January 3, 2010 Report Share Posted January 3, 2010 I am greatly saddened by this turn of events, I had hoped to test out my WRC nookz on Poyples. Join the queue it seems Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charles the Great Posted January 3, 2010 Report Share Posted January 3, 2010 RABBLE RABBLE RABBLECongratulations I guess. I was looking forward to some GLOBAL WOAR though. yeah I was finally looking forward to kicking some $@! with all my new toys also (maxed out military wonders since the KW) OOC-sup marxie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Santorini Posted January 3, 2010 Report Share Posted January 3, 2010 o/ Peace. Glad to see this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hizzy Posted January 3, 2010 Report Share Posted January 3, 2010 However, I think I'm quoting Kodiak, a government official in the 57th Overlanders, exactly when I say "We intend to ZI Browncoats." That objective has not been achieved. No, you're quoting someone who is no longer a government official. That should tell you something about the 57th's objectives regarding the ZI of BC. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neuronia Posted January 3, 2010 Report Share Posted January 3, 2010 No, you're quoting someone who is no longer a government official. That should tell you something about the 57th's objectives regarding the ZI of BC. One can only believe what one's told. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ragnor Posted January 3, 2010 Report Share Posted January 3, 2010 I think I'm quoting Kodiak, a government official in the 57th Overlanders, exactly when I say "We intend to ZI Browncoats."So who won? As I said before, white peace means nobody "won", but rather everyone decided to stop fighting. However, only one side achieved their stated objectives. You fail to note that Kodiak withdrew that statement on the grounds that he flustered into saying it while being heavily outnumbered in initial talks after the DoW. As for "winning", you could say both sides won as the 57th aim was to neutralise a threat to their security while LoSS/Nemesis/CoJ was to defend BC. There is no threat to the 57th's security anymore and BC is no longer under attack. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zzzptm Posted January 3, 2010 Report Share Posted January 3, 2010 I'm certain that as long as Nueva Vida supports spying, incompetence, and hee-hawing pre-emptive strikes that, yes, the chances we see each other around will remain high. While Browncoats, CoJ and others cooly played- and planned-out a war, the rabidly anti-BC 57th Overlanders fell all over themselves and got their fannies paddled.And while you act cute with quotes, you might disclose I was very luckily not involved in peace talks. And if 57th Overlanders is in the business of declaring war on anyone they think has designs of harm on them, they'd better adopt TPF's 24/7 DefCon1 policies. We don't support any of those things. We were ready to support our allies in AZTEC, and we provided full support to them. That support was requested at the negotiation table, and it ended a needless war. We weren't going to allow this small brushfire to turn into a global conflagration. The tip of the tail should not move the lion, Schattenmann. I think we're all glad that the proper order of things has been restored. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
empirica Posted January 3, 2010 Report Share Posted January 3, 2010 Boo for Yawoo! Also, obligatory whining And, obligatory o/ peace or something Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pyroman Posted January 3, 2010 Report Share Posted January 3, 2010 Well, glad this is over. Thanks for making it quick everyone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jerry wagner Posted January 3, 2010 Report Share Posted January 3, 2010 Glad to see this over without a high loss of lives. CoIN supports its allies in the 57th..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sargun II Posted January 3, 2010 Report Share Posted January 3, 2010 You fail to note that Kodiak withdrew that statement on the grounds that he flustered into saying it while being heavily outnumbered in initial talks after the DoW. As for "winning", you could say both sides won as the 57th aim was to neutralise a threat to their security while LoSS/Nemesis/CoJ was to defend BC. There is no threat to the 57th's security anymore and BC is no longer under attack. Kodiak withdrew the statement because he knows he said an idiotic thing. 57th failed in their objective to ZI BC, plain and simple. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kzoppistan Posted January 3, 2010 Report Share Posted January 3, 2010 Well done to all involved. o/ Peace! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coloradia Posted January 3, 2010 Report Share Posted January 3, 2010 Kodiak withdrew the statement because he knows he said an idiotic thing. 57th failed in their objective to ZI BC, plain and simple. Really? Believe me, I've talked to 57th plenty over the past few days and they had no intention of ZI'ing all of BC. If the only thing you can base your claims on is one misspoken sentence by someone who was outnumbered and clearly flustered then perhaps you need to take a course in Logic 101? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charles the Great Posted January 3, 2010 Report Share Posted January 3, 2010 (edited) We don't support any of those things. We were ready to support our allies in AZTEC, and we provided full support to them. That support was requested at the negotiation table, and it ended a needless war. We weren't going to allow this small brushfire to turn into a global conflagration.The tip of the tail should not move the lion, Schattenmann. I think we're all glad that the proper order of things has been restored. well said. o/NV o/AZTEC Edited January 3, 2010 by Charles the Great Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hizzy Posted January 3, 2010 Report Share Posted January 3, 2010 Kodiak withdrew the statement because he knows he said an idiotic thing. 57th failed in their objective to ZI BC, plain and simple. Well you failed in your objective to not give them white peace. I obviously don't care about the facts of the matter, I rather enjoy talking out of my $@!. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sargun II Posted January 3, 2010 Report Share Posted January 3, 2010 (edited) Really? Believe me, I've talked to 57th plenty over the past few days and they had no intention of ZI'ing all of BC. If the only thing you can base your claims on is one misspoken sentence by someone who was outnumbered and clearly flustered then perhaps you need to take a course in Logic 101? It was obviously not misspoken. How can you misspeak "We intend to ZI Browncoats."? If Kodiak was outnumbered and clearly flustered, then he should have not bowed to pressure and spoken something other than the truth. You admit that he is a liar, now you expect me to believe the thing he says immediately after he lies. Make up your mind. I, for one, will not believe the hasty excuses of liars. Well you failed in your objective to not give them white peace. I obviously don't care about the facts of the matter, I rather enjoy talking out of my $@!. Our objective was to defend our ally. Perhaps what Schattenmann said was true, that he would have none of white peace. And as you can publicly see, he had on say in the matter to give them white peace. Edited January 3, 2010 by Sargun Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.