rabonnobar Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 Nice. Congrats to both. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
curufinwe Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 Nice to see, makes me happy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AirMe Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 Interesting move. I wonder what your allies in STA and NpO have to say about this. Should be fun to watch this play out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kulomascovia Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 Immoral treaty is immoral. Congratulations to IRON and NSO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sourcy Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 OH HEY LOOKS LIKE THERES GOING TO BE A WAR TONIGHT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krunk the Great Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 Nice, 2 fail alliances joined together. Oh the irony. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sulmar Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 I can dig it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MagicalTrevor Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 This is a match made in heaven, the two worst posting alliances joined together in one big cuddle of fail. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebel Virginia Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 Not to be rude or anything... but I thought NSO didn't like Optional Aggression/Optional Defense clauses because of the rule that you can attack/defend against/for anything/anyone you want at any time for any reason? While it is true that we do not need such a clause in order to get involved that will not stop us from entering an agreement if there is such a clause. I see no reason to get huffy about something we could care less about. Our stance on aggression is well known. If we see fit to get involved we will get involved. End of story. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heft Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 Not to be rude or anything... but I thought NSO didn't like Optional Aggression/Optional Defense clauses because of the rule that you can attack/defend against/for anything/anyone you want at any time for any reason? Yea, well, Preambles don't really mean a whole lot either. In or out doesn't make much of a difference. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Confusion Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 Interesting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hakim Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 Congrats to our allies in IRON... Congrats NSO... o/IRON o/ NSO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hepokatti Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 Congrats to NSO and IRON! o/ NSO o/ IRON Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The AUT Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 MK's reaction: Priceless. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krunk the Great Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 This is a match made in heaven, the two worst posting alliances joined together in one big cuddle of fail. God, quit killing me with this irony. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ClashCityRocker Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 looks like a nice treaty o/ IRON o/ NSO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivan Moldavi Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 Interesting move. I wonder what your allies in STA and NpO have to say about this. Should be fun to watch this play out. Not sure, I didn't ask them. They don't generally ask my opinion when they sign MDPs and I would never expect them to. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trout Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 Good !@#$ from both of these fine alliances. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crusty Juggler Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 I've liked you guys ever since we had the Q&A session, glad to see this Hi Heft o/ NSO o/ IRON Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K1L1O Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 Congratulations for both parties Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doitzel Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 What? The Sith are fair-weather supporters of the oppressive old order? Well I'm just shocked! Absolutely shocked! Well, maybe not that shocked. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chickenzilla Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 MK's reaction:Priceless. Misr raising his post count: Worthless. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sethb Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 (edited) You two deserve each other. Edited January 2, 2010 by sethb Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yankees Empire Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 This treaty is relevant to most of CN's interests. Congrats though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wfbone Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 I think i just had a mental orgasm. o/ NSO o/ IRON Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.