maicke Posted December 24, 2009 Report Share Posted December 24, 2009 Question: For the total number of vehicles, can you have more than what you would normally have for tanks? For example, lets say I could have a max of 5000 tanks ingame. Meaning I could have a max of 5000 tanks in RP. But I want some other vehicles too, like IFVs or APCs. Could I have the 5000 tanks, plus x number of IFVs and y number of APCs? Or would I have to have 5000 total vehicles, meaning less tanks if I wanted more IFVs/APCs? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sargun II Posted December 24, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 24, 2009 To be honest, this has never been officially ruled on as far as I know. In my personal opinion, 1 tank = 1 non-tank vehicle as well. If I can have 5000 tanks (including things mounted on tanks), I should also have 5000 non-tank military vehicles, like APCs. Then again, the APCs wouldn't particularly do much to change the course of battle as I don't have them in-game, which makes it harder to choose a decision. I'd just throw in a reasonable number of non-tank military vehicles, and if you need to ask if it's reasonable or not, it probably isn't. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JerreyRough Posted December 25, 2009 Report Share Posted December 25, 2009 As far as I know, 1 IG tank = 1 IC vehicle, and your military vehicle force cannot be bigger than your IG tank amount (discluding things like trucks for fuel/ammo/troop movement, but including things like armed trucks/APC's). I don't thing an actual military force is going to have two thousand plus tanks, and moving that many tanks over land/air/ocean would be costly because of their combined weight. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maicke Posted December 25, 2009 Report Share Posted December 25, 2009 (edited) Hmm, two different answers. >_> I was also wondering the same thing about artillery and helicopters. And for one last thing, I assume just because we only have one bomber in game that doesn't mean we can only have one bomber/squad of bombers RP? For example, even though I still would have 105 planes/squads total, it wouldn't matter how many are fighters or how many are bombers? In a war, having only one bomber would pretty much make your air force useless on the offensive. :3 Sorry if I'm over complicating RP, if that's even possible. Edited December 25, 2009 by maicke Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ray Matveyev Posted December 25, 2009 Report Share Posted December 25, 2009 Is there any territory that is in the Pacific, or borders it, that I can talk to a nation to claim? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sarah Tintagyl Posted December 25, 2009 Report Share Posted December 25, 2009 Is there any territory that is in the Pacific, or borders it, that I can talk to a nation to claim? Where at in the Pacific or bordering it were you thinking of? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elrich von Richt Posted December 25, 2009 Report Share Posted December 25, 2009 Is there any territory that is in the Pacific, or borders it, that I can talk to a nation to claim? Ray, if you need to, talk to me on MSN about this and I'll help you with it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lynneth Posted December 25, 2009 Report Share Posted December 25, 2009 Hmm, two different answers. >_>I was also wondering the same thing about artillery and helicopters. And for one last thing, I assume just because we only have one bomber in game that doesn't mean we can only have one bomber/squad of bombers RP? For example, even though I still would have 105 planes/squads total, it wouldn't matter how many are fighters or how many are bombers? In a war, having only one bomber would pretty much make your air force useless on the offensive. :3 Sorry if I'm over complicating RP, if that's even possible. Modern fighters are multirole and can do bombaring missions, too, just not on the scale dedicated bombers can. Also, the fighter/bomber ratio is based on the honor system, because nobody can see what you actually have. Same with ships. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Centurius Posted December 25, 2009 Report Share Posted December 25, 2009 Where at in the Pacific or bordering it were you thinking of? This pretty much You can go both ways, Asia and Oceania or the Americas Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
loannes Posted December 25, 2009 Report Share Posted December 25, 2009 Hmm, two different answers. >_>I was also wondering the same thing about artillery and helicopters. And for one last thing, I assume just because we only have one bomber in game that doesn't mean we can only have one bomber/squad of bombers RP? For example, even though I still would have 105 planes/squads total, it wouldn't matter how many are fighters or how many are bombers? In a war, having only one bomber would pretty much make your air force useless on the offensive. :3 Sorry if I'm over complicating RP, if that's even possible. Artillery: I've always operated under "Max IG tanks *5" Helicopters: Be reasonable Bombers: No idea. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Acca Dacca Posted December 25, 2009 Report Share Posted December 25, 2009 Taiwanese Empire territory should be labelled Acca Dacca. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amyante Posted December 25, 2009 Report Share Posted December 25, 2009 Artillery: I've always operated under "Max IG tanks *5"Helicopters: Be reasonable Bombers: No idea. I used to put artillery and support vehicles in with the tanks when it came to calculating caps, but i later found out that wasn't necessary. Since my transports have gun mounts i'm still lobbing them in under artillery / support, and the combined total must not exceed max IG tank count. Given the x10 multiplier on soldiers i doubt i'll run out of crew anyway. Helicopters and bombers both fall under aircraft for me. If the aircraft is primarily a fighter it'll count as a fighter, if it's a bomber it'll count as a bomber. In the case of multiroles it's entirely up to you what to use them for, but ammo for ground targets isn't going to do much good in a dogfight so in the end you're still assigning fighter and bomber roles to them. Just be reasonable with them Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iKrolm Posted December 26, 2009 Report Share Posted December 26, 2009 Green islands: Should be marked Minilla Island Blue island: Should be marked Australia Red islands: Who owns these? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elrich von Richt Posted December 26, 2009 Report Share Posted December 26, 2009 (edited) @iKrolm: The upper red island is owned by Dai Etania Teikoku, and the lower red islands are owned by USET. Needed Updates: - Vauleo-Buryatian Protectorate returned to Dai Etania Teikoku, Kamchatka marked as Vauleo-Buryatian Protectorate - PDHR Protectorate in Antartica changed to DET Protectorate, Dai Etania Teikoku Protectorate in Antarctica changed to Dai Etania Teikoku Edited December 26, 2009 by Elrich von Richt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JerreyRough Posted December 26, 2009 Report Share Posted December 26, 2009 Loving the South American christmas colors ^.^ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elrich von Richt Posted December 26, 2009 Report Share Posted December 26, 2009 http://g.imagehost.org/view/0023/newmap3 Partial Update. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amyante Posted December 26, 2009 Report Share Posted December 26, 2009 (edited) http://g.imagehost.org/view/0023/newmap3Partial Update. Daqing still needs to be recolored from blue to pink, and Sargun has Taipei so that should be DET-green now i believe. Other than that, good update is good. Edited December 26, 2009 by Amyante Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sargun II Posted December 26, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 26, 2009 Taipei is DET green. Update tonight when I get home from Christmas parties. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amyante Posted December 26, 2009 Report Share Posted December 26, 2009 Ah sorry, mistook the city for the island. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bull Run Posted December 26, 2009 Report Share Posted December 26, 2009 (edited) The Confederate States of American can be taken off the map..I've rerolled as the Federation of Ukraine in the Caucasion protectorate of Ukraine. If it could please be colored green, that would be great. Edited December 26, 2009 by Bull Run Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lynneth Posted December 26, 2009 Report Share Posted December 26, 2009 http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?s...t&p=2054105 Deutscher Bund is a GDR protectorate. Again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tahsir Posted December 26, 2009 Report Share Posted December 26, 2009 http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?s...t&p=2054105Deutscher Bund is a GDR protectorate. Again. So he rerolled to mess with a NPC that used to be a PC that RP'd with Sarah? Then left? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lynneth Posted December 26, 2009 Report Share Posted December 26, 2009 So he rerolled to mess with a NPC that used to be a PC that RP'd with Sarah? Then left? Only he got banned and probably did this because he has a grudge against Sarah. No idea. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
comrade nikonov Posted December 26, 2009 Report Share Posted December 26, 2009 http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?s...t&p=2054305 Valkurheim is now part of the Federal Union of Belarus and Moldova,for the same reasons as above. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sarah Tintagyl Posted December 27, 2009 Report Share Posted December 27, 2009 http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?s...t&p=2054630 Following this post, please mark that island as the Queendom of Australia Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.