Jump to content

African Mobalizations


Lavo

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 365
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Then you best watch your words, else hypocrisy may hold your tongue.

"The Kingdom of Cochin, is in itself imperialistic, and we do not condemn imperialism as such categorically. However the actions which Aphrike Treaty signatories have launched upon Somalian states are veiled in xenophobia and dripping in regionalism when the real issue is plain and simple imperialism. We condemn this move precisely because of the overt and covert threat now being presented against the Kingdom of Cochin. So we must sadly refuse the censure emanation from UMS and make our position clear.

Any attempt to attack, blockade or invade any territory of the Kingdom of Cochin would be considered as casus belli."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While we understand removing a vile colony from Italy, we do not understand the attack on the sovereign nation of Italica whom has posed no threat to the combatants.

It is notable that the Rebel Army is moving against colonialism, and why we once again ask them to remove themselves from South America fully. While we understand that Equador is not in fact a colony and is totally self governing, it would increase the perception of Rebel Army in the eyes of all Americans and indeed the world, as well as eliminating any possibility that RA could be labeled as imperialist if they withdrew.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Funny, many of you welcomed or ignored Somalia Italiana until they were fully settle, and now you finally notice that it was a "colony". Awareness fail.

So you only support the right thing if it is done when you think it should be done - not that it should be done at all but only at a certain time. Intriguing.

While we understand removing a vile colony from Italy, we do not understand the attack on the sovereign nation of Italica whom has posed no threat to the combatants.

Italica owns a colony in Africa and the colony must be liberated - Italica herself, in Italy, is not a target of these operations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"It is ironic that America has left Rebel Army's Equador in peace because the Rebels returned the favor and allowed the nation the highest degree of autonomy aside from full sovereignty. Now, when Italica is operating in a similar fashion they are considered "colonialists", even though they have done no harm to any of their neighbors?

Although the sabers are being rattled outside of our sphere, we strongly condemn this move and ask Rebel Army to look at its own actions before punishing others for doing the same thing."

EDIT: OOC: Is Italica being hit too or not? I'm lost now.

Edited by V The King
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you only support the right thing if it is done when you think it should be done - not that it should be done at all but only at a certain time. Intriguing.

So you have trouble noticing IF it is a colony or not for the past several months? You should have noticed it was a colony when it settled in Africa and demanded them to leave long before they were settled so the removal of the colony is easier. There is an old saying, "An ounce of prevention is worth an ounce of cure.", aka, "Prevent the problem or fix it soon or it will take more effort to solve later on."

Intriguing.

"It is ironic that America has left Rebel Army's Equador in peace because the Rebels returned the favor and allowed the nation the highest degree of autonomy aside from full sovereignty. Now, when Italica is operating in a similar fashion they are considered "colonialists", even though they have done no harm to any of their neighbors?

Although the sabers are being rattled outside of our sphere, we strongly condemn this move and ask Rebel Army to look at its own actions before punishing others for doing the same thing."

EDIT: OOC: Is Italica being hit too or not? I'm lost now.

Indeed. It's funny how Rebel Army has a colony in South America but at the same time ranting about how evil colonization is and attempting to remove colonization in Africa.

That is like a person saying chocolate should be banned while eating chocolate in front of everyone.

Edited by HHAYD
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you only support the right thing if it is done when you think it should be done - not that it should be done at all but only at a certain time. Intriguing.

Italica owns a colony in Africa and the colony must be liberated - Italica herself, in Italy, is not a target of these operations.

"We hope Carthage diplomats know that there are two entities called Somalia Italiana and Italica in Somalia? Only one of them is a colony - the other is a sovereign African nation."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Italica owns a colony in Africa and the colony must be liberated

So with what exactly are you going to replace this stable colonial administration? More anarchy and instabilty? That's a step in the right direction... not!

Anyone who knows African history knows that Somalia has proven time and time again incapable of ruling itself. The colonial regimes in Somalia are the lesser of two evils, so leave them be!

The best hypocrisy to come out of these events is if Somalia simply ends up being occupied by the invaders or other large, greedy African powers - in other words, replacing one colonial regime for another.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IC: "We hereby condemn these actions. As a nation whose ancestors were mainly German settlers who shipwrecked in Antarctica, we are highly disturbed by the events taking place in East Africa. we also note that Italica is getting blockaded, which is strange because they don't have anything to do with what's going on in Italian Somalia."

OOC: By the way, I've re-rolled as South Pole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is notable that the Rebel Army is moving against colonialism, and why we once again ask them to remove themselves from South America fully. While we understand that Equador is not in fact a colony and is totally self governing, it would increase the perception of Rebel Army in the eyes of all Americans and indeed the world, as well as eliminating any possibility that RA could be labeled as imperialist if they withdrew.
"It is ironic that America has left Rebel Army's Equador in peace because the Rebels returned the favor and allowed the nation the highest degree of autonomy aside from full sovereignty. Now, when Italica is operating in a similar fashion they are considered "colonialists", even though they have done no harm to any of their neighbors?

Although the sabers are being rattled outside of our sphere, we strongly condemn this move and ask Rebel Army to look at its own actions before punishing others for doing the same thing."

"As expected, Tahoe and Viniland whine over Ecuador without any substantial reason. As everyone knows, allowing a nation join yours when they ask and petition you, after a democratic vote, is the same as colonialism. It is also worth noting that one of these criticizers attacked Ecuador with nuclear weapons in cold blood. So excuse us if we care about your opinion as much as smelly trash. Regardless, we would still hit Italica even if they were not colonists, as they are #^$&!*@ fascists. Scum like that do not deserve to see the light of day."

Edited by Lavo_2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"As expected, Tahoe and Viniland whine over Ecuador without any substantial reason. As everyone knows, allowing a nation join yours when they ask and petition you, after a democratic vote, is the same as colonialism. Regardless, we would still hit Italica even if they were not colonists, as they are #^$&!*@ fascists. Scum like that do not deserve to see the light of day."

I believe the people of Somalia are quite pleased with the peace and stability being under a colonial power has brought them. Tahoe is not aware of any major public disturbances in Somalia since its colonization? Neither are we aware of any democratic movement by the Somalian people to be "liberated" by RA. Indeed, if we attacked Equador to liberate it from you, we could use your exact same arguements and you would have no basis to critisize our move. Consider your actions and their implications for the future of America-RA relations and how the precedent you are setting here, could and likely will be used in regards to Equador in the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So with what exactly are you going to replace this stable colonial administration? More anarchy and instabilty? That's a step in the right direction... not!

Anyone who knows African history knows that Somalia has proven time and time again incapable of ruling itself. The colonial regimes in Somalia are the lesser of two evils, so leave them be!

The best hypocrisy to come out of these events is if Somalia simply ends up being occupied by the invaders or other large, greedy African powers - in other words, replacing one colonial regime for another.

"We are not content with the lesser of two evils - we must proceed to get rid of both evils and replace them with the greater and lesser goods."

"We hereby condemn these actions. As a nation whose ancestors were mainly German settlers who shipwrecked in Antarctica, we are highly disturbed by the events taking place in East Africa. we also note that Italica is getting blockaded, which is strange because they don't have anything to do with what's going on in Italian Somalia."

"Thank you for saying nothing of importance?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe the people of Somalia are quite pleased with the peace and stability being under a colonial power has brought them. Tahoe is not aware of any major public disturbances in Somalia since its colonization? Neither are we aware of any democratic movement by the Somalian people to be "liberated" by RA. Indeed, if we attacked Equador to liberate it from you, we could use your exact same arguements and you would have no basis to critisize our move. Consider your actions and their implications for the future of America-RA relations and how the precedent you are setting here, could and likely will be used in regards to Equador in the future.

"You are forgetting one key point here. Even if Italica was not a colonial power we would still be acting the same way. If we wished, we could have not mentioned colonialism at all in our DoW, and it would be the same thing. I fail to see your point about democratic movements. As for your last line, is that a threat?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...