Dochartaigh Posted November 15, 2009 Report Share Posted November 15, 2009 heh. seriously, i was hoping with the end of the TPF/Trouble/JE topics, there would be an end to ridiculous topics. seems my hopes were for not. <3 HisK. also, aggressive actions has always been considered to include spy ops, sanctions, as well as actual attacks. heck, i seem to recall that even a mention of an alliance being on a poll for war as being used as being aggressive. that being said, who honestly cares about who started what. war is upon you, be happy since many of ya'll whined and moaned about it a few days ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
President Gunn Posted November 15, 2009 Report Share Posted November 15, 2009 heh. seriously, i was hoping with the end of the TPF/Trouble/JE topics, there would be an end to ridiculous topics. seems my hopes were for not. <3 HisK. also, aggressive actions has always been considered to include spy ops, sanctions, as well as actual attacks. heck, i seem to recall that even a mention of an alliance being on a poll for war as being used as being aggressive. that being said, who honestly cares about who started what. war is upon you, be happy since many of ya'll whined and moaned about it a few days ago. Thank you. If we do go by these standards. OP started by talking about who they should hit or talking about how they should roll LE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ammon Posted November 15, 2009 Report Share Posted November 15, 2009 Let this be the last post in this idiotic topic: Lafayette Escadrille claims victory simply because all we want to do is fight. No matter who wins or loses, all pixels are dust in a short time, and the WAR is all that matters. S! OP! S! all who fight hard! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titus Pullo Posted November 15, 2009 Report Share Posted November 15, 2009 No matter who wins or loses, all pixels are dust in a short time, and the WAR is all that matters. If this is true, LE wouldn't have asked for help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
President Gunn Posted November 16, 2009 Report Share Posted November 16, 2009 If this is true, LE wouldn't have asked for help. But we were nice enough to notice the group of huge guys beating up a little kid* in the alley so we went to help. Sorry we ruined your curb stomp :/ (*in respect to AA size) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maicke Posted November 16, 2009 Report Share Posted November 16, 2009 If this is true, LE wouldn't have asked for help. if we let you guys roll us, then the we all would be pretty much ZI'd or rerolling and there would be no war. which means we couldnt lose our pixels Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ammon Posted November 16, 2009 Report Share Posted November 16, 2009 If this were not true we wouldn't have attacked an alliance 6 times our size, dumbass. We invited friends to join in the slaughter, not save our $@!. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titus Pullo Posted November 16, 2009 Report Share Posted November 16, 2009 If this were not true we wouldn't have attacked an alliance 6 times our size, dumbass. We invited friends to join in the slaughter, not save our $@!. So you admit LE is the aggressor? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ammon Posted November 16, 2009 Report Share Posted November 16, 2009 (edited) Nope, we were preemptively spied by OP. Edited November 16, 2009 by Ammon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titus Pullo Posted November 16, 2009 Report Share Posted November 16, 2009 (edited) Nope, we were preemptively spied by OP. I assume you have proof this time? Edited November 16, 2009 by Titus Pullo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ammon Posted November 16, 2009 Report Share Posted November 16, 2009 Already posted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titus Pullo Posted November 16, 2009 Report Share Posted November 16, 2009 Already posted. Please feel free to direct me to where you posted definitive evidence that OP was conducting government sanctioned espionage against LE prior to hostilities. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ammon Posted November 16, 2009 Report Share Posted November 16, 2009 Sure pay pal me fifty bucks and I will be your research assistant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titus Pullo Posted November 16, 2009 Report Share Posted November 16, 2009 Sure pay pal me fifty bucks and I will be your research assistant. So you still refuse to provide evidence to your claims of espionage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ammon Posted November 16, 2009 Report Share Posted November 16, 2009 No, I refuse to do your homework for you. Ask your Mom, maybe she will help you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReadyFireAIm Posted November 16, 2009 Report Share Posted November 16, 2009 OP should not have declared war until they had more allies secured for the fight. Then again, LE might have attacked soon after the pics of Jim saying he wanted to exterminate LE were posted. It's hard to tell what would have happened. The only thing I'm sure of is the countless posts and threads showing that OP and it's members/leadership wanted to take out countless alliances was what ultimately made gaining allies easy for LE. leaks were bound to happen in a 400 person alliance. That is why most leaders should post who they want to attack in govt. only areas. ps . By attacked I mean an actual in-game declaration of war. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titus Pullo Posted November 16, 2009 Report Share Posted November 16, 2009 OP should not have declared war until they had more allies secured for the fight.leaks were bound to happen in a 400 person alliance. That is why most leaders should post who they want to attack in govt. only areas. "Ordo Paradoxia hereby recognizes a state of war with Lafayette Escadrille." We didn't really declare war, now did we? Second: Your argument for the "govt. only areas" only works if that was a discussion of official policy... Which is wasn't. Thanks for backing up my point though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomasj_tx Posted November 16, 2009 Report Share Posted November 16, 2009 So spied screen shots are now a kosher way to get "friends" or "allies" or what ever they are called? Spy a general membership lulz poll results in..... "Spying on an Alliances' forum = Good" "Lulz polls made in the first days of a round = Bad" Is that the TE Round 8 definition of "Honor"? Or is there no honor of any sort in TE anymore? Just asking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tequila Mockingbird Posted November 16, 2009 Report Share Posted November 16, 2009 A sanction is not an attack in TE. Just a hug. Go play with your dolls and stop crying. Well actually anything is a reason to attack in TE. Thats why we play. 7 alliances =/= 40 nations, go do some math you'll need practice for the championship next semester. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Owned-You Posted November 16, 2009 Report Share Posted November 16, 2009 The war isn't over by any stretch of the imagination. So I don't quite understand why LE or OP have declared victory at this stage of the conflict. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titus Pullo Posted November 16, 2009 Report Share Posted November 16, 2009 The war isn't over by any stretch of the imagination. So I don't quite understand why LE or OP have declared victory at this stage of the conflict. We have claimed victory because the necessity for a coalition to form against us proves our military superiority. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Style #386 Posted November 16, 2009 Report Share Posted November 16, 2009 The war isn't over by any stretch of the imagination. So I don't quite understand why LE or OP have declared victory at this stage of the conflict. Titus cannot grasp simple concepts and as such deludes himself into believing that OP has won. LE's thread is a parody. Anybody with any sense whatsoever knows that this is far from over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titus Pullo Posted November 16, 2009 Report Share Posted November 16, 2009 Titus cannot grasp simple concepts and as such deludes himself into believing that OP has won. LE's thread is a parody. Anybody with any sense whatsoever knows that this is far from over. The conflict does not need to be over for one to be victorious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Style #386 Posted November 16, 2009 Report Share Posted November 16, 2009 The conflict does not need to be over for one to be victorious. Then you suggest that the outcome is pre-determined? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomasj_tx Posted November 16, 2009 Report Share Posted November 16, 2009 LE's thread is a parody. Anybody with any sense whatsoever knows that this is far from over. Wow, that went full oval..... http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?s...t&p=1971988 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts