HisK Owns You Posted November 15, 2009 Report Share Posted November 15, 2009 My flag^ It took a 400 man alliance to take on LE. It seems like I found out who really won. Move along everyone... o/ Lafayette Escadrille HisK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
President Gunn Posted November 15, 2009 Report Share Posted November 15, 2009 (edited) /me mumbles about stealing MY thoughts. Anyway Congratz LE on your victory!!! o/ LE o/ PU o/ That funny man Hisk edit: changed His to MY Edited November 15, 2009 by President Gunn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Style #386 Posted November 15, 2009 Report Share Posted November 15, 2009 As legitimate a declaration of victory as I've yet seen in my short days on Steve. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titus Pullo Posted November 15, 2009 Report Share Posted November 15, 2009 It took a 400 man alliance to take on LE. LE attacked OP. So I don't see how you could say we took you on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maicke Posted November 15, 2009 Report Share Posted November 15, 2009 LE attacked OP. So I don't see how you could say we took you on. hes not LE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titus Pullo Posted November 15, 2009 Report Share Posted November 15, 2009 hes not LE Excuse me... LE attacked OP. So I don't see how you could say we took LE on. fixed for you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drai Posted November 15, 2009 Report Share Posted November 15, 2009 (edited) hes not LE I'm assuming he meant it in the sense that Hisk strongly supports LE and that side of the war. If you're talking to a football fan, most of the time you would say "we beat you" and it is understood what is meant by the statement. Edit: Pretty trivial, I probably shouldn't have posted this if a debate's going to start :/ Edited November 15, 2009 by Drai Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hassman Posted November 15, 2009 Report Share Posted November 15, 2009 Hisk. Well now i can try and get out of anarchy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
President Gunn Posted November 15, 2009 Report Share Posted November 15, 2009 You should really know your Alliance politics before you start debating/arguing on the OWF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titus Pullo Posted November 15, 2009 Report Share Posted November 15, 2009 You should really know your Alliance politics before you start debating/arguing on the OWF. Agreed, now go read up and then come on back and we'll debate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maicke Posted November 15, 2009 Report Share Posted November 15, 2009 I'm assuming he meant it in the sense that Hisk strongly supports LE and that side of the war. If you're talking to a football fan, most of the time you would say "we beat you" and it is understood what is meant by the statement.Edit: Pretty trivial, I probably shouldn't have posted this if a debate's going to start :/ no, i just didnt want people to say that LE claimed victory. like in your example, fans say that their team will win all the time, and if the team loses, who cares? but if the team says 'oh yeah we'll win' and then loses, they get bad publicity (i.e. the thing with the french saying that they could beat michael phelps in the olympics) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
President Gunn Posted November 15, 2009 Report Share Posted November 15, 2009 Agreed, now go read up and then come on back and we'll debate. Hmm I'm more than up to date. What about you? But still if it took an AA almost 6 times bigger than LE to win. LE won this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titus Pullo Posted November 15, 2009 Report Share Posted November 15, 2009 Hmm I'm more than up to date. What about you?But still if it took an AA almost 6 times bigger than LE to win. LE won this. It took 9 alliances for LE to have a hope of winning it's aggressive war... Seriously, go study some more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hassman Posted November 15, 2009 Report Share Posted November 15, 2009 (edited) It took 9 alliances for LE to have a hope of winning it's aggressive war... Seriously, go study some more. OP started it! Edited November 15, 2009 by Hassman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HisK Owns You Posted November 15, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 15, 2009 It took 9 alliances for LE to have a hope of winning it's aggressive war... Seriously, go study some more. A sanction is not an attack in TE. Just a hug. Go play with your dolls and stop crying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius C Nero Posted November 15, 2009 Report Share Posted November 15, 2009 o/ Lafayette Escadrille o/ HisK It takes a 400 man alliance to hold their own in a fight with Lafayette Escadrille. That alone speaks volumes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titus Pullo Posted November 15, 2009 Report Share Posted November 15, 2009 OP started it! You obviously don't know what "aggressive" means. A sanction is not an attack in TE. Just a hug. Go play with your dolls and stop crying. Sanctioning is a form of economic blockade. TE or not, that is an aggressive action. Not to mention LE spying away our nukes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HisK Owns You Posted November 15, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 15, 2009 Not to mention LE spying away our nukes. ZOMG! They took nukes?!?!? HOW COULD THEY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titus Pullo Posted November 15, 2009 Report Share Posted November 15, 2009 ZOMG! They took nukes?!?!? HOW COULD THEY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! So espionage is not an aggressive action? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
President Gunn Posted November 15, 2009 Report Share Posted November 15, 2009 You obviously don't know what "aggressive" means.Sanctioning is a form of economic blockade. TE or not, that is an aggressive action. Not to mention LE spying away our nukes. An aggressive act would also include attacking a member of an AA. For instance some LE senators? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HisK Owns You Posted November 15, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 15, 2009 So espionage is not an aggressive action? Nukes are not safe. LE was just looking out for you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mista Wigga Posted November 15, 2009 Report Share Posted November 15, 2009 o/ LE o/ PU Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomasj_tx Posted November 15, 2009 Report Share Posted November 15, 2009 While LE did commit Acts of War prior to the all out engagement, the LE nations that I have encountered on the battlefield have fought honorably and valiantly. But as to the bandwagon jumpers..... On the topic of “victory”, LE currently has over 60% of their nations in Anarchy. And we know that nearly 100% of those were put there by OP nations. OP currently has about 40% of their nations in Anarchy. And unless someone has been keeping track of the numbers, we know that a large portion of those were put there by other than LE nations. I guess one can claim “victory” after hundreds and hundreds of fresh nations attack nations that had already incurred the loses that come from days of hard fought battles. That is your prerogative. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titus Pullo Posted November 15, 2009 Report Share Posted November 15, 2009 An aggressive act would also include attacking a member of an AA. For instance some LE senators? Now, I don't know what "LE senators" are, but I'm going to assume you're talking about our retaliation against Black Team senators for their sanctioning of our members. That's called a defensive act. The aggressive action that prompted that defensive move was the sanctioning, and the retaliatory action was a limited scope war against the two Black Team Senators responsible. So no, that's not an aggressive act. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HisK Owns You Posted November 15, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 15, 2009 OP made a topic about “victory” when I looked at your nations. I don't see much of a victory. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts