Tiberius C Nero Posted November 13, 2009 Report Share Posted November 13, 2009 (edited) Here, I'll quote it for ya. Since Blue Team decided to employ sanctions as protection for Blue members, we'll do the same. Being OP is blue, we'd like all OP member to move off Black Team.Effective immediately, we'll sanction any OP found on Black Team. Salute! Fish Again that has OP making the first move. So it is Ok for you guys to do it? But wrong for everyone else to do it? Talk about holier than thou. BTW how many LE members would you allow on Blue without fear of sanction? Edited November 13, 2009 by Liman Von Sanders Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avernite Posted November 13, 2009 Report Share Posted November 13, 2009 Here, I'll quote it for ya. Again that has OP making the first move. So it is Ok for you guys to do it? But wrong for everyone else to do it? Talk about holier than thou. BTW how many LE members would you allow on Blue without fear of sanction? Yes, that just shows how wrong your argument is because... That post you quote is utter nonsense. OP offered protection FROM sanctions on Blue, IE no sanctions against anyone. In 'retaliation' (huh, what? Retaliating to noone being sanctioned?) LE sanctioned OP nations. No, really, very agressive of us that we attack those senators over that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titus Pullo Posted November 13, 2009 Report Share Posted November 13, 2009 Here, I'll quote it for ya. Again that has OP making the first move. So it is Ok for you guys to do it? But wrong for everyone else to do it? Talk about holier than thou. BTW how many LE members would you allow on Blue without fear of sanction? If you read the rest of the thread, you'll note that OP does not, has not, and will not sanction any member of the Blue Team, regardless of Alliance Affiliation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius C Nero Posted November 13, 2009 Report Share Posted November 13, 2009 Yes, that just shows how wrong your argument is because...That post you quote is utter nonsense. OP offered protection FROM sanctions on Blue, IE no sanctions against anyone. In 'retaliation' (huh, what? Retaliating to noone being sanctioned?) LE sanctioned OP nations. No, really, very agressive of us that we attack those senators over that. How about this, How about, instead of beating ourselves up trying to figure out who STARTED this. Why not figure out a way to stop it? Work toward a solution. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titus Pullo Posted November 13, 2009 Report Share Posted November 13, 2009 How about this, How about, instead of beating ourselves up trying to figure out who STARTED this.Why not figure out a way to stop it? Work toward a solution. So you give up trying to prove, with absolutely no evidence, that OP was the aggressor in this war? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avernite Posted November 13, 2009 Report Share Posted November 13, 2009 How about this, How about, instead of beating ourselves up trying to figure out who STARTED this.Why not figure out a way to stop it? Work toward a solution. But that would be boring... We have war, we have bickering, we can prove we are holier than thou, why would we end this bliss just to save a few pixels? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius C Nero Posted November 13, 2009 Report Share Posted November 13, 2009 (edited) Here's a little overview of the situation. 1. JimKongIl makes a statement on OP forums basically threatening LE by saying OP should roll them for LE sanctioning him during [insert round here] 2. LE sanctions Black team OP members as a way of saying NO U! 3. LE get's nukes spied by unknown party as a way of saying NO U! 4. LE spies OP nukes as a way of saying NO U! 5. OP Power slams LE, again as a way of saying NO U! so why don't both sides just take turns saying NO U and be done with it lol. EDIT: And 6. We got OP cluttering the forum saying "But we didn't start it, Honest we didn't" Edited November 13, 2009 by Liman Von Sanders Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ferdinand I Posted November 13, 2009 Report Share Posted November 13, 2009 EDIT: And 6. We got OP cluttering the forum saying "But we didn't start it, Honest we didn't" That is probably because it's true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titus Pullo Posted November 14, 2009 Report Share Posted November 14, 2009 1. JimKongIl makes a statement on OP forums basically threatening LE by saying OP should roll them for LE sanctioning him during [insert round here] Didn't that post occur in a private forum? I didn't know you could threaten someone who isn't present. Oh that's right, it doesn't matter because OP is the big bad guy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lysander Posted November 14, 2009 Report Share Posted November 14, 2009 He said, she said, did not, did too, don't do that, i just did Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts