kulomascovia Posted October 28, 2009 Report Share Posted October 28, 2009 Tech raiding rules? Diplomacy? In TE? Jeez, since when has TE become this dull? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HisK Owns You Posted October 28, 2009 Report Share Posted October 28, 2009 Tech raiding rules? Diplomacy? In TE? Jeez, since when has TE become this dull? Have RE raid a big alliance and dont stop the members... See how long they last this round. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimKongIl Posted October 28, 2009 Author Report Share Posted October 28, 2009 Tech raiding rules? Diplomacy? In TE? Jeez, since when has TE become this dull? If you had at least one attacking casualty then you might have had a better argument. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kulomascovia Posted October 28, 2009 Report Share Posted October 28, 2009 Have RE raid a big alliance and dont stop the members... See how long they last this round. I did that last round. I would attack anyone within my range if they are attacking an RE member. Nothing much happened. In fact, I don't think RE has ever issued tech raiding rules until this round and I don't think that had a negative impact on RE. Personally, I don't see the necessity of having tech raiding rules in a war game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kulomascovia Posted October 28, 2009 Report Share Posted October 28, 2009 (edited) If you had at least one attacking casualty then you might have had a better argument. Don't worry, I'll get some soon; I haven't had much time to build up my nation. As soon as I get some decent trades and a warchest, I'll rack up some casualties. You should have seen my nation at the end of last round! EDIT: Also, I fail to see how me not having any casualties disproves my argument. Edited October 28, 2009 by kulomascovia Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gabryal Posted October 28, 2009 Report Share Posted October 28, 2009 (edited) Lol, good precedent to set, mass ghosting/merging as a way to win! If it works I suppose... I think we had a total of six or seven people from RoWN, and maybe 2-3 from OB, 7 out of 10 have remained TPF this round. Also while I never really trusted you Tiberius ( in a game sense, I wonder what kind of RL encounter we would have ) I do just Jim Edited October 28, 2009 by Gabryal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimKongIl Posted October 28, 2009 Author Report Share Posted October 28, 2009 Tech raiding rules? Diplomacy? In TE? Jeez, since when has TE become this dull? If you knew how many pms I sent and received over 4 raids today this rule might make more sense to you. Rules can change but right now this is the best (and easiest) policy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gabryal Posted October 28, 2009 Report Share Posted October 28, 2009 If you knew how many pms I sent and received over 4 raids today this rule might make more sense to you. Rules can change but right now this is the best (and easiest) policy. I'd like to say that OP's raiding rules are ALOT stricter than almost every other alliance ( NONE get's a pass ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
erikz Posted October 28, 2009 Report Share Posted October 28, 2009 Ordo Paradoxia also does not you know? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
partymaster Posted October 28, 2009 Report Share Posted October 28, 2009 RE had the same policy last round Also, I love mai warz anyone who interferes with said wars faces an unstoppable supply of bonzais (I MHA, PU, and AoD they gave me one of the top 30 casualty spots last round ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lysander Posted October 28, 2009 Report Share Posted October 28, 2009 I did that last round. I would attack anyone within my range if they are attacking an RE member. Nothing much happened. In fact, I don't think RE has ever issued tech raiding rules until this round and I don't think that had a negative impact on RE. Personally, I don't see the necessity of having tech raiding rules in a war game. ....Tech raiding a bigger alliance=bad. What do you think would happen if we raided OP and didn't stop the raiders? Say hello to a war that I doubt many would support us in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
partymaster Posted October 28, 2009 Report Share Posted October 28, 2009 Say hello to a war that I doubt many would support us in. I would (No clue if my alliance would but you know me on TE ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimKongIl Posted October 30, 2009 Author Report Share Posted October 30, 2009 I would (No clue if my alliance would but you know me on TE ) Set your gov position and you'll be able to buy more tech. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drai Posted November 4, 2009 Report Share Posted November 4, 2009 This rule does not apply to sanctioned alliances Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rtellez06 Posted November 4, 2009 Report Share Posted November 4, 2009 LOL keep thinking that! You lost your top spot because of us. We didnt attack you to get first. Oh get off your high horse. If MHA and RE went 1 vs 1 RE would have won. But it didn't work out like that. You guys again went close to 3 vs 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheEraser Posted November 5, 2009 Report Share Posted November 5, 2009 Oh get off your high horse. If MHA and RE went 1 vs 1 RE would have won. But it didn't work out like that. You guys again went close to 3 vs 1 LOL both of those alliances are pathetic excuses for alliances. Neither had an efficient war machine. The only efficient war machines i've seen in this game is 1. Murder Inc in early rounds 2. LE (tip: they were a splinter from MI to hide our true strength originally, these guys are hella active and know what they're doing... and 3. hopefully OP. i've never seen an alliance that has such an allstar cast and has the activity to back it up as OP has. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dom Zak Posted November 12, 2009 Report Share Posted November 12, 2009 I have never seen this rule enforced. I see OP nations raiding allainces with 30 members. This is unacceptable. Keep your nations under control! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Believland Posted November 13, 2009 Report Share Posted November 13, 2009 How about you make us? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts