Starcraftmazter Posted September 21, 2009 Report Share Posted September 21, 2009 You saw an opportunity to take a cheap shot at a Frostbite member and you took it. Understandable, if not very inspired. Yes, because anyone who doesn't love frostbite and doesn't agree with you lot 100% of the time must be out to take a cheap shot at it Not defensive at all, just pointing out you really just posted to make noise rather than contribute anything much to the discussion. Well that's really a matter of opinion isn't it? I don't particularly like raiding, and I think raiding nuclear armed nations is just stupid, and I have every right to comment here just as you or anyone else so... I think it's both funny and cute how several individuals like you and Corinan get so worked up at the slightest hint of disagreement or disapproval with anyone in FB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Penguin Posted September 21, 2009 Report Share Posted September 21, 2009 Well that's really a matter of opinion isn't it? I don't particularly like raiding, and I think raiding nuclear armed nations is just stupid, and I have every right to comment here just as you or anyone else so...I think it's both funny and cute how several individuals like you and Corinan get so worked up at the slightest hint of disagreement or disapproval with anyone in FB. Fiercely defending your allies in public and private is what being a good ally is all about. I'm sure you try to stand up for your own just like we do for ours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tygaland Posted September 21, 2009 Report Share Posted September 21, 2009 Yes, because anyone who doesn't love frostbite and doesn't agree with you lot 100% of the time must be out to take a cheap shot at it Well that's really a matter of opinion isn't it? I don't particularly like raiding, and I think raiding nuclear armed nations is just stupid, and I have every right to comment here just as you or anyone else so... I think it's both funny and cute how several individuals like you and Corinan get so worked up at the slightest hint of disagreement or disapproval with anyone in FB. I didn't mention anything about Frostbite. I only pointed out you were arguing with people who don't exist. What reason you had for doing that only you truly know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hydro Posted September 21, 2009 Report Share Posted September 21, 2009 (edited) Fiercely defending your allies in public and private is what being a good ally is all about. I'm sure you try to stand up for your own just like we do for ours. I wouldn't bet on it if I were you. edit: context Edited September 21, 2009 by Hydro Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sigrun Vapneir Posted September 21, 2009 Report Share Posted September 21, 2009 (edited) There's a !@#$load of alliances out there, there's got to be at least one that'd be for them. You don't just join an alliance for protection, you join it because if you don't you're missing out on more than half of the CN experience. I know I for one spend more time on my alliance boards and IRC than I do on my actual nation and I seriously doubt I'm the only one that does. If CN had no Alliances and thus none of the tension and politics they bring along with them this game would be unbelievably dull. That's what unaligned nations are missing out on. They're doing nothing other than collecting taxes and paying bills everyday. I just can't understand anyone finding that enjoyable. It's not like they're really contributing much to CN anyway if they're just keeping to themselves. Does it really make a difference to anyone in an alliance if they're here or aren't here?And that's the funny thing about it. The only one that truly benefits from the existence of unaligned nations is the tech raider. And yet it's the non-raider that wants them to have the right to stay unaligned and the tech raider who claims that nations should join an alliance if they want to be safe, and yet if all unaligned nations did that they wouldn't have any targets. An amusing bit of irony there. Here's another funny thing. You dont *need* to understand why someone would want to remain unaligned in order to respect their borders. But if you are truly so worried about them missing out I suggest you volunteer with a division of your alliance probably known by the moniker "recruiting." Remember that letters are an efficient way of delivering messages, and bombs are an efficient way of destroying life and property - they are not at all similar and should not be confused. Edited September 21, 2009 by Sigrun Vapneir Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corinan Posted September 21, 2009 Report Share Posted September 21, 2009 I think it's both funny and cute how several individuals like you and Corinan get so worked up at the slightest hint of disagreement or disapproval with anyone in FB. If I was truly "worked up" your nation would be smoke and rubble already. I only responded to you because it amuses me to do so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief Savage Man Posted September 21, 2009 Report Share Posted September 21, 2009 Nigras always was a jokester. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tushar Dhoot Posted September 21, 2009 Report Share Posted September 21, 2009 Oleg was a real member of AO, he wasn't ghosting them.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heracles the Great Posted September 21, 2009 Report Share Posted September 21, 2009 Well this is entertaining - The rules of tech raiding are up to each and every alliance - that beign said, how someone responds to such attacks is up to them. The difference between spying to change defcon for better GA odds and spying to lower nukes that can be used in retaliation can be debated, but the point of tech raiding is to profit, and you'd likely have to steal a great deal of tech to make up for 5-6 nukes being launched against your nation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timmmehhh Posted September 21, 2009 Report Share Posted September 21, 2009 FOK would accept a nation that has declared war on a member of tLC? Interesting.... Is there a problem? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heft Posted September 21, 2009 Report Share Posted September 21, 2009 Is there a problem? Are you....challenging him? Over this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comrade Goby Posted September 21, 2009 Report Share Posted September 21, 2009 Is there a problem? No problem at all. Any nations at war with FOK feel free to join the Liquor Cabinet! I'm sure you guys have no problem with it, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
519 Nigras Posted September 22, 2009 Report Share Posted September 22, 2009 Would FOK be opposed to me redeclaring after this war? Official response please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StOAKEd Posted September 22, 2009 Report Share Posted September 22, 2009 Is there a problem? FOK!-CharterArticle 1 - Membership of the Alliance a. The council decides on admission towards membership. b. The Alliance is open to all orange nations who respect the articles in this charter as well as the FOK Code of Conduct and are in accordance with the following: - the applicant can not be a member of another alliance and can not be at war during the application hmmm.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Denniswerf Posted September 22, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 22, 2009 hmmm.... Luckily I am in a techraid and not in a war Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TehChron Posted September 22, 2009 Report Share Posted September 22, 2009 Luckily I am in a techraid and not in a war That is arguably one of the most blatant attempts at E-Lawyering I have ever seen. If you didn't already look horribly pathetic and hypocritical already, I would point out how this makes you look. However, in this case, you may as well keep yourself digging to the bottom, after all, it's not like FOK cares what anyone else thinks about them accepting attention whores/Publicly announced Nuke Rogues/Complete tools anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Denniswerf Posted September 22, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 22, 2009 (edited) Oleg was a real member of AO, he wasn't ghosting them.... Hmm, I am sure an AO member had declared on him with the reason 'ghosting' Anyways: I didn't attack him since he had no soldiers and I would only be able to destroy something. That goes in against all principles of a techraid Edited September 22, 2009 by Denniswerf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StOAKEd Posted September 22, 2009 Report Share Posted September 22, 2009 Luckily I am in a techraid and not in a war What a ridiculous response. You are in an all out nuclear war with nigras. Can you explain the difference between a tech raid and a war? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TehChron Posted September 22, 2009 Report Share Posted September 22, 2009 Hmm, I am sure an AO member had declared on him with the reason 'ghosting'Anyways: I didn't attack him since he had no soldiers and I would only be able to destroy something. That goes in against all principles of a techraid Prove it. And that second part is another terrible attempt at spin. Do you really not care how stupid you look? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Denniswerf Posted September 22, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 22, 2009 What a ridiculous response. You are in an all out nuclear war with nigras. Can you explain the difference between a tech raid and a war? Of course A techraid is started to raid tech (like its says) and to make a profit A war is meant to completely to try to destroy the opponent Nigras started a techraid, and as a responce of that I nuked him once to damage him too. Then he decided to make it an all out nuclear war by nuking back (I even offered peace) and by sending in the 2nd nuke. He could have taken the first request for peace after the nuke, he could have nuked me back and offering me peace. In the end its him who decided to make this an all outgoing techraid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StOAKEd Posted September 22, 2009 Report Share Posted September 22, 2009 Anyways: I didn't attack him since he had no soldiers and I would only be able to destroy something. That goes in against all principles of a techraid One might consider that war slot filling. If you can call your nuclear war a tech raid then why not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TehChron Posted September 22, 2009 Report Share Posted September 22, 2009 One might consider that war slot filling. If you can call your nuclear war a tech raid then why not? Because he has no shame? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Denniswerf Posted September 22, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 22, 2009 (edited) One might consider that war slot filling Ahh, maybe thats the reason I got the yellow exclamation warning? Because he has no shame? You forgot to mention I have no feelings Anyways, lets concentrate on this techraid and see how it goes When we started: Dennis Technology: 4,500.14 Infrastructure: 9,999.99 Area of Influence: 6,871.490 mile diameter Nigras Technology: 7,900.00 Infrastructure: 6,999.99 Area of Influence: 3,402.184 mile diameter. Right now Dennis Technology: 4,130.89 Infrastructure: 8,317.27 Area of Influence: 4,164.282 mile diameter. Nigras Technology: 7,394.96 Infrastructure: 5,109.53 Area of Influence: 1,246.560 mile diameter. Results: Dennis - 470 tech (an extra 100 because of techdeals) - 1682 infrastructure - 2710 land - still enough money Nigras - 500 tech - 1981 infra - 2920 land - hardly any money left So far I am slightly ahead if you just look to those numbers. Of course my infrastructure is more expensive at that level Edited September 22, 2009 by Denniswerf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TehChron Posted September 22, 2009 Report Share Posted September 22, 2009 You forgot to mention I have no feelings Since you're only doing this for attention, clearly you have feelings. You hate being ignored, for example. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Augustus Autumn Posted September 22, 2009 Report Share Posted September 22, 2009 Since you're only doing this for attention, clearly you have feelings. You hate being ignored, for example. I'm sensing an aura of truth around this man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts