Rude Empire Posted November 7, 2007 Report Share Posted November 7, 2007 i say yes as i want the tech requiraments DOWN! as i was ready for level 7 aircraft (for defence reasons) and i can't get it becuase i'm 250 tech short Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jutopia la Posted November 8, 2007 Report Share Posted November 8, 2007 no because, even though i cant buy level 9s yet and before, i could, planes are very destructive when in full force level nines and only very strong nations should be able to have a full fleet airforce. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apocalypse Now Posted November 8, 2007 Report Share Posted November 8, 2007 no no no no no no Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stormsend Posted November 8, 2007 Report Share Posted November 8, 2007 I like the new setup, but I think the tech reqirments sould be lowered a bit, like 300 tech for 9th level or somthing. Your name is Fistandantilus, but your avatar is Vincent? This is madness. /me kicks a Persian. On subject... No. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Z Posted November 8, 2007 Report Share Posted November 8, 2007 No. The way it is now is fine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gene L Posted November 8, 2007 Report Share Posted November 8, 2007 The Infrastructure requirements need to be upped. I really don't know why they fell in the first place. I think the tech changes are actually pretty good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smallfrog Posted November 8, 2007 Report Share Posted November 8, 2007 i say yesas i want the tech requiraments DOWN! as i was ready for level 7 aircraft (for defence reasons) and i can't get it becuase i'm 250 tech short I can only get lvl 6 despite having lvl 9's before. Now as my air force is 1/2 9, 1/2 6 I have decide which fighters to send into combat. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Srqt Posted November 8, 2007 Report Share Posted November 8, 2007 Im thinking of a word that rhymes with snail. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
idriveavw Posted November 8, 2007 Report Share Posted November 8, 2007 Im thinking of a word that rhymes with snail. pail? trail? whale? gale? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morey 2k7 Posted November 8, 2007 Report Share Posted November 8, 2007 No should stay as it is now, with tech being significantly reduced on NS side, tech is playing a more major role in military. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wazcaster Posted November 8, 2007 Report Share Posted November 8, 2007 Voted yes. There is now ay an F-86 sabre (which is only armed with guns) is more advanced than an ICBM (which is what all NS nations with nukes must use). No way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Bwalla III Posted November 8, 2007 Report Share Posted November 8, 2007 I think tech requirements should go down and infra should go up. actually...it doesn't even have to be like that. i would just like a tech-infra ratio to pace myself off of. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fistandantilus Posted November 9, 2007 Report Share Posted November 9, 2007 Tech has become really important now that they removed the tech cap. I think tech requirements should go down and infra should go up. And I completly agree with that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gambit Posted November 9, 2007 Report Share Posted November 9, 2007 ^This mabey something like 2,000 Infra and 200 or 300 Tech for level 9 planes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fistandantilus Posted November 9, 2007 Report Share Posted November 9, 2007 That looks good/reasonable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edgartree Posted November 9, 2007 Report Share Posted November 9, 2007 Voted no, I love this new change, makes the game a little tougher in war. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gambit Posted November 9, 2007 Report Share Posted November 9, 2007 ^ I agree as well Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Embereus Posted November 10, 2007 Report Share Posted November 10, 2007 (edited) Honestly I'm fine with this new change in tech. requirement... It compensates for all the whining we've seen about the tech change. Many nations are humongous... Nations at around 6k to 7k NS before had the 100 tech requirement. This change is to prolong the game per se. Edited November 10, 2007 by Embereus Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jerdge Posted November 10, 2007 Report Share Posted November 10, 2007 I'm unsure about the tech level that should be needed for each type of aircraft. However, when you need more tech to build a Bristol Blenheim than what you need to build a Nuclear weapon, something is wrong. (I know that nobody with 75 Tech has really the opportunity to buy Nukes, however... It still sounds wrong.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
monkey theory Posted November 10, 2007 Report Share Posted November 10, 2007 I think the tech required for nukes needs to be upped( not have it based on the top 5%). But your theory is flawed we Have had nukes (in real life of course) since ww2 and the Tupolev Tu-160 is arguably one of the most advanced weapon platforms in use today. I think the tech levels should be raised since third rate countries could have nukes but not high tech aircraft (think north Korea or Iran) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jerdge Posted November 11, 2007 Report Share Posted November 11, 2007 You're not wrong, monkey theory. I also think that high tech aircraft require more Tech (and less Infra) than Nukes, but as it is now in game it's too much unbalanced. The fact is, that I mentioned the Blenheim, that is not even a jet, and not the Tu-160: that was done on purpose. I didn't want to fully bring in the requirements for Nukes, but since you mentioned them... I personally believe that the Tech requirements should be raised (to somewhere around 150-200) and a huge Infrastructure level should be required also. The 5% requirement doesn't make much sense, instead. And/or, the airplanes Tech requirements may be lowered a bit, but shall not be brought back to what they were before the update (that were surely too low). One way or the other, Nukes less advanced than the Blenheim = bad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
enderland Posted November 14, 2007 Report Share Posted November 14, 2007 it should be increased even more. I agree. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amiles Posted November 27, 2007 Report Share Posted November 27, 2007 This thread equals FAIL. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noob Cake Posted November 30, 2007 Report Share Posted November 30, 2007 Raise it by 3x the requirement Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cookieking Posted November 30, 2007 Report Share Posted November 30, 2007 (edited) No. This was a big gravedig btw. Edited November 30, 2007 by cookieking Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.