Francesca Posted August 22, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 Don't know about that, but i think you should consider changing your sig.It's kinda breaking the NAP you just signed. Check article 2. Says something about being civil and such . Yes, it says we should be civil to one another. It says nothing about light-hearted jokes. *draws obvious parallel to PC, points out moral highground didn't help TPF much* Actually, TPF garnered some decent PR. They will be able to rebuild themselves into a respectable alliance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shodemofi-NPO Posted August 22, 2009 Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 Actually, TPF garnered some decent PR. They will be able to rebuild themselves into a respectable alliance. I'd say PC got bad PR more than TPF got good PR. I think TPF's PR came from sticking it out as the last one, etc. etc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Francesca Posted August 22, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 I'd say PC got bad PR more than TPF got good PR. A bit of both, perhaps. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trikoupis Posted August 22, 2009 Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 Yes, it says we should be civil to one another. It says nothing about light-hearted jokes. I'm very happy to hear it's just a light-hearted joke Could Hell Scream join pink now? Would make the joke better Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wickedj Posted August 22, 2009 Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 (edited) Yes, it says we should be civil to one another. It says nothing about light-hearted jokes.Actually, TPF garnered some decent PR. They will be able to rebuild themselves into a respectable alliance. Theres two things that dont belong together.. Edited August 22, 2009 by wickedj Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Francesca Posted August 22, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 I'm very happy to hear it's just a light-hearted joke Could Hell Scream join pink now? Would make the joke better Sorry, but we are a red alliance. Theres two things that dont belong together.. On the contrary, TPF fought to the death for their allies and refused to compromise their ethics in the face of overwhelming odds, unlike the Coalition of Cowards. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trikoupis Posted August 22, 2009 Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 (edited) Sorry, but we are a red alliance. Well, you also have blue, yellow, maroon, green and brown. Some pink wouldn't hurt you much... You can also become a pink alliance if need be. No problem with that I'd propose you for pwn Doesn't anybody else think that Hell Scream should join pink? Edited August 22, 2009 by Trikoupis Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Francesca Posted August 22, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 Well, you also have blue, yellow, maroon, green and brown. Some pink wouldn't hurt you much... Probably because they already have trade circles. You can also become a pink alliance if need be. No problem with that We're already signatories of the Red Dawn unity treaty, and we're quite happy with that. But thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trikoupis Posted August 22, 2009 Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 Oh come on, let's get him on pink. For a week or so at least? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Francesca Posted August 22, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 (edited) Oh come on, let's get him on pink. For a week or so at least? Actually, if I was feeling particularly cruel, I might do that just to spite him.......... Edited August 22, 2009 by Francesca Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Boris Posted August 22, 2009 Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 On the contrary, TPF fought to the death for their allies and refused to compromise their ethics in the face of overwhelming odds, unlike the Coalition of Cowards. TPF was in the coalition of cowards, No amount of grandstanding afterwords can erase that. Its a good lesson for you, a small measure of the drooling masses jumping on the IS is evil bandwagon doesn't change CG being a repulsive joke. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George the Great Posted August 22, 2009 Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 *draws obvious parallel to PC, points out moral highground didn't help TPF much* You have to climb the hill of morality before having the moral high-ground, and that is a feat that few on this planet have done. If someone decides to attack you on the immoral low-ground while you're down there as well, you don't magically teleport to the moral high-ground. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Francesca Posted August 22, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 TPF was in the coalition of cowards, No amount of grandstanding afterwords can erase that. It was not mhawk's decision to cancel on Pacifica. Its a good lesson for you, a small measure of the drooling masses jumping on the IS is evil bandwagon doesn't change CG being a repulsive joke. We'd be more of a repulsive joke if we lay down for a bully. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wickedj Posted August 22, 2009 Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 It was not mhawk's decision to cancel on Pacifica.We'd be more of a repulsive joke if we lay down for a bully. Sure as heck fooled me, he runs that ship doesnt he? "it was the one armed man who cancelled on you" as King Boris said a few posts above me, TPF bailed at the first sight of war and nothing will change that..though what else would you expect from an alliance partially formed out of cowardice On topic, look at how well forced treaties worked out in the past (see: TPF/PC and NpO/NPO) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Boris Posted August 22, 2009 Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 Mhawk's signature was on the cancellation. As far as I know he has never claimed it was a forgery. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wickedj Posted August 22, 2009 Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 Mhawk's signature was on the cancellation. As far as I know he has never claimed it was a forgery. i was JUST asking someone that because i didnt feel like looking for the announcement Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Francesca Posted August 22, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 Mhawk's signature was on the cancellation. As far as I know he has never claimed it was a forgery. Have you checked that? I don't remember it being there when I read that announcement. This is off-topic. Keep TPF out of this announcement please. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Der Kommissar Posted August 22, 2009 Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 Have you checked that? I don't remember it being there when I read that announcement. This is off-topic. Keep TPF out of this announcement please. Indeed it is, warnings will be handed out to everyone taking this discussion offtopic from now on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Druss the Legend Posted August 22, 2009 Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 I'm quite happy to see this. Hail Peace and all that stuff. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haflinger Posted August 22, 2009 Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 Yes, this is good, except it would've been nice to have this in with the terms thread. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alterego Posted August 22, 2009 Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 History is repeating itself. Pink alliance gets into trouble. After eating humble pie they sign a "forced" NAP, all thats left is a DoW by IS to break the NAP and the circle is complete. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keve69 Posted August 22, 2009 Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 Happy to see this! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trikoupis Posted August 23, 2009 Report Share Posted August 23, 2009 I must admit that i like Hell Scream's new sig much more. Nice meeting you, feel free to visit for tea and cookies . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JackSkellington Posted August 23, 2009 Report Share Posted August 23, 2009 Excellent /s/ for Hellscream. Good show on CG's part. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hell Scream Posted August 23, 2009 Report Share Posted August 23, 2009 History is repeating itself. Pink alliance gets into trouble. After eating humble pie they sign a "forced" NAP, all thats left is a DoW by IS to break the NAP and the circle is complete. It's not a forced NAP, I believe they threw around the idea of a NAP, or maybe Doitzel/Elyat. IS will stick to it's words. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.