Frankdolf Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 lawlz. ask NPO about doing just that. IS, you better watch your back within three years of controlling the cyberverse. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Reccesion Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 By making a statement saying you won't do anything, you are doing nothing. "You have our diplomatic assistance in this matter.... well that was easy guys, now just wait for the good PR to roll in B) "IS is IS nobody can change who they are. See? It works with other alliances too. No CB is better than a fake CB any day. Saying "we're attacking you because we want to" is better than formulating some BS CB. TC was doing more than helping diplomaticly but they want one more chance at a peaceful end to this, and now we await the end to this, whatever it may be. What NSO does is not what IS does, they don't annoy people instead they put people in their place, I don't see any reason someone would want NSO rolled for no other reason that they rolled their own alliance. I really don't care about the no CB/ fake CB thing. What is wrong is wrong Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankdolf Posted August 22, 2009 Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 TC was doing more than helping diplomaticly but they want one more chance at a peaceful end to this, and now we await the end to this, whatever it may be. What NSO does is not what IS does, they don't annoy people instead they put people in their place, I don't see any reason someone would want NSO rolled for no other reason that they rolled their own alliance. I really don't care about the no CB/ fake CB thing. What is wrong is wrong Okay, so you're waiting around to see if any bigger alliances will actually back you up before you defend your friends, and NSO is apparently a knight in shining armour. Atleast when you admit there is no CB, you're telling the truth. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Reccesion Posted August 22, 2009 Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 Okay, so you're waiting around to see if any bigger alliances will actually back you up before you defend your friends, and NSO is apparently a knight in shining armour. Atleast when you admit there is no CB, you're telling the truth. We arn't waiting around for anyone, we can't go and attack someone for no reason (like IS), as I was saying we can't just attack if CG doesn't want to. NSO might be, I didn't say they were if you comepare IS and NSO then I would say yes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankdolf Posted August 22, 2009 Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 We arn't waiting around for anyone, we can't go and attack someone for no reason Attacking your friends seems like a perfectly good reason Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ludacrism2 Posted August 22, 2009 Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 (edited) Okay, so you're waiting around to see if any bigger alliances will actually back you up before you defend your friends, and NSO is apparently a knight in shining armour. Atleast when you admit there is no CB, you're telling the truth. No one said anything about that. You are assuming things. I would think that would be evident. Maybe I should ask Jazzy95 to change the post from Moral support to Full Support, and then you'd understand? Tell me, have you been involved in talks in this situation? No? Then how would you know whats going on? Edited August 22, 2009 by Ludacrism2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Reccesion Posted August 22, 2009 Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 Attacking your friends seems like a perfectly good reason IS isn't our greatest friends around Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankdolf Posted August 22, 2009 Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 IS isn't our greatest friends around You may have misunderstood my post? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Reccesion Posted August 22, 2009 Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 You may have misunderstood my post? You used sarcasm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Uruk Posted August 22, 2009 Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 So, um, Doitzel is doing more than an alliance who are supposed to be "best friends" or something. Watch it, you might get branded one of those "optional only" alliances. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankdolf Posted August 22, 2009 Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 No one said anything about that. You are assuming things.I would think that would be evident. Maybe I should ask Jazzy95 to change the post from Moral support to Full Support, and then you'd understand? Tell me, have you been involved in talks in this situation? No? Then how would you know whats going on? Of course no one said anything about that, who would admit such a thing? It's up to those not simply interested in making pink bleed to find the true motives nobody but the alliance in question knows. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ludacrism2 Posted August 22, 2009 Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 Right. Even though no one had ever heard of TC, we want to destroy pink. Yep thats what it is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Uruk Posted August 22, 2009 Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 Right. Even though no one had ever heard of TC, we want to destroy pink. Yep thats what it is. Rolling pink is the new morality. Everybody's doing it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hell Scream Posted August 22, 2009 Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 Pink attacked us, we didn't attack pink. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ludacrism2 Posted August 22, 2009 Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 Rolling pink is the new morality. Everybody's doing it. You said it not me Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Uruk Posted August 22, 2009 Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 You said it not me Actually, the angsty rulers hungry for drama who see a couple of slip-ups in security said it, not me. Then again, moral support doesn't get much rolling done. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ludacrism2 Posted August 22, 2009 Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 Are you saying you want someone to get rolled? Weirdooo Anyway, situation resolved. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
generals3 Posted August 22, 2009 Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 (edited) Pink attacked us, we didn't attack pink. from what i heard and see (ur sig for instance) u are attacking/attacked the whole pink sphere verbally and in case you didn't know it is the cheap way to get involved into a war. By attacking someone verbally you hope he retaliates with arms and than you can say they attacked you first. Which is cheap and honor-less. Edited August 22, 2009 by generals3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dochartaigh Posted August 22, 2009 Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 from what i heard and see (ur sig for instance) u are attacking/attacked the whole pink sphere verbally and in case you didn't know it is the cheap way to get involved into a war. By attacking someone verbally you hope he retaliates with arms and than you can say they attacked you first. Which is cheap and honor-less. or ya know, people could defend themselves verbally as well. tis not that difficult, and if IS can only retaliate with physical arms to someone's verbal assaults on them and/or pink then that is IS's fault and no one elses. Same with any alliance really. it was IS who was cheap and honor-less for not being able to do one of two things. 1) defend themselves and/or pink verbally (i.e. wits.... IS has none) 2) take it and ignore it (thick skin.... again IS has none, though they seem to dish it out) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Reccesion Posted August 22, 2009 Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 from what i heard and see (ur sig for instance) u are attacking/attacked the whole pink sphere verbally and in case you didn't know it is the cheap way to get involved into a war. By attacking someone verbally you hope he retaliates with arms and than you can say they attacked you first. Which is cheap and honor-less. What about everyone else other than CG? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.