jraenar Posted December 1, 2011 Report Share Posted December 1, 2011 (2, -138) gave 99% Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chintan Posted December 1, 2011 Report Share Posted December 1, 2011 (edited) Ok, down to just 3 possible locations. Try them in this order: (2, -137) URL: lon=-137&lat=2 (2.99999999, -138) URL: lon=-138&lat=2.99999999 (1, -137) URL: lon=-137&lat=1 Edited December 1, 2011 by Chintan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keenedge Posted December 1, 2011 Report Share Posted December 1, 2011 (edited) [quote name='Chintan' timestamp='1322732214' post='2858067'] (2, -137) URL: lon=-137&lat=2 [/quote] We have a winner. Thanks as always, Chintan. [img]http://www.rgaltizer.com/sharefolder/decembermoon.jpg[/img] Edited December 1, 2011 by Keenedge Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Velocity111 Posted December 2, 2011 Report Share Posted December 2, 2011 Does anyone know if, when generating a new moon colony population, the population from the old moon colony is factored in? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Nathan Brittles Posted December 2, 2011 Report Share Posted December 2, 2011 [quote name='Velocity111' timestamp='1322795204' post='2858851'] Does anyone know if, when generating a new moon colony population, the population from the old moon colony is factored in? [/quote] No it's not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chintan Posted December 2, 2011 Report Share Posted December 2, 2011 (edited) [quote name='Captain Nathan Brittles' timestamp='1322801711' post='2858977'] No it's not. [/quote] What? I'm pretty sure the last time I reset my mars colony, the colony's citizen count was set to 5% of my total citizen count immediately before the reset, and that total citizen count includes the mars citizens I had before the reset. Edited December 2, 2011 by Chintan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonnygozy Posted December 2, 2011 Report Share Posted December 2, 2011 [quote name='Chintan' timestamp='1322814450' post='2859243'] What? I'm pretty sure the last time I reset my mars colony, the colony's citizen count was set to 5% of my total citizen count immediately before the reset, and that total citizen count includes the mars citizens I had before the reset. [/quote] If that were the case, then wouldn't you just keep gaining extra citizens with every reset of your colony? That wouldn't really make sense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chintan Posted December 3, 2011 Report Share Posted December 3, 2011 [quote name='jonnygozy' timestamp='1322840588' post='2859390'] If that were the case, then wouldn't you just keep gaining extra citizens with every reset of your colony? That wouldn't really make sense. [/quote] Not really. It'll approach a maximum, which is 6.38298% for the moon colony and 5.26316% for the mars colony. Suppose you have 100,000 earth citizens and 6,382 moon citizens, so your total citizen count is 106,382. If you reset, your moon population gets set to 6% of 106,382, which is 6,382, so your colony population doesn't change at all. If your moon population is less than 6.38298% of your earth population and you reset the colony, you'll gain citizens, but if it's above 6.38298% of your earth population, you'll actually lose citizens. Here's what happens if you buy a new colony and keep resetting over and over (assuming you have 100k earth citizens and 100% colony effectiveness every time you reset): Start: 100,000 earth population; 0 moon population; 100,000 total population New Colony: 100,000 earth population; (100,000)*6/100 = 6,000 moon population; 106,000 total population 1st reset: 100,000 earth population; (106,000)*6/100 = 6,360 moon population; 106,360 total population 2nd reset: 100,000 earth population; (106,360)*6/100 = 6,381 moon population; 106,381 total population 3rd reset: 100,000 earth population; (106,381)*6/100 = 6,382 moon population; 106,382 total population And then any resets after that don't change the moon population. It just stays at 6,382. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pd73bassman Posted December 4, 2011 Report Share Posted December 4, 2011 Thanks guys Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CubaQuerida Posted January 1, 2012 Report Share Posted January 1, 2012 50% at both 2.00000, -137.00000 and -12.00000, -19.00000 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chintan Posted January 1, 2012 Report Share Posted January 1, 2012 (edited) [size="5"][b]Moon Hotspot Location (January 2012):[/b][/size] [size="5"][b](-60, 89) URL: lon=89&lat=-60[/b][/size] Points Tried: (2, -137): 50% (-12, -19): 50% (-48, 120): 85% (-60, 91): 99% (-60, 92): 98% (-60, 90): 99% Progress Maps: With: (2, -137): 50% (-12, -19): 50% [spoiler][img]https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-_LV3N4qh7zs/TwAPi-6y7uI/AAAAAAAAARA/P8Tm-qJmqdk/s0/Screen%252520shot%2525202012-01-01%252520at%2525202.45.28%252520AM.png[/img][/spoiler] With: (2, -137): 50% (-12, -19): 50% (-48, 120): 85% (-60, 91): 99% (-60, 92): 98% (-60, 90): 99% [spoiler][img]https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-L_jXtbduZnc/TwCODdq_LCI/AAAAAAAAARY/vDOCeFSurZY/s0/Screen%252520shot%2525202012-01-01%252520at%25252011.45.24%252520AM.png[/img][/spoiler] Edited January 1, 2012 by Chintan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jraenar Posted January 1, 2012 Report Share Posted January 1, 2012 (edited) 85% at (-48, 120). 99% at (-60, 91). Edited January 1, 2012 by jraenar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
probablamenteno Posted January 1, 2012 Report Share Posted January 1, 2012 (edited) 98% at (-60, 92) 99% at (-60, 90) Edited January 1, 2012 by probablamenteno Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chintan Posted January 1, 2012 Report Share Posted January 1, 2012 Ok, just two points left. The first one is probably it: (-60, 89) URL: lon=89&lat=-60 (-59, 89) URL: lon=89&lat=-59 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
probablamenteno Posted January 1, 2012 Report Share Posted January 1, 2012 [quote name='Chintan' timestamp='1325436596' post='2890057'] Ok, just two points left. The first one is probably it: (-60, 89) URL: lon=89&lat=-60 [s](-59, 89) URL: lon=89&lat=-59[/s] [/quote] And indeed it is. Thanks, and Happy New Year! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arch3004 Posted January 1, 2012 Report Share Posted January 1, 2012 [quote name='Chintan' timestamp='1325436596' post='2890057'] Ok, just two points left. The first one is probably it: (-60, 89) URL: lon=89&lat=-60 (-59, 89) URL: lon=89&lat=-59 [/quote] Yep. 100% at (-60, 89) URL: lon=89&lat=-60 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jraenar Posted February 1, 2012 Report Share Posted February 1, 2012 (edited) -60,91 is 50%, and so is -48,120 [size="1"]Close enough last time I never bothered moving[/size] Ok, and tried a guess on the other side of moon close to where the line goes. 37,-63 is 73%. Hotspot is 60,-15. Cuz I'm just an effin' rockstar like that. [IMG]http://i39.tinypic.com/2ngeome.png[/IMG] Edited February 1, 2012 by jraenar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chintan Posted February 1, 2012 Report Share Posted February 1, 2012 [quote name='jraenar' timestamp='1328076970' post='2912378'] -60,91 is 50%, and so is -48,120 [size="1"]Close enough last time I never bothered moving[/size] Ok, and tried a guess on the other side of moon close to where the line goes. 37,-63 is 73%. Hotspot is 60,-15. Cuz I'm just an effin' rockstar like that. [IMG]http://i39.tinypic.com/2ngeome.png[/IMG] [/quote] Congrats! Was it a guess, or did you calculate the location? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chintan Posted February 1, 2012 Report Share Posted February 1, 2012 [size="5"][b]Moon Hotspot Location (February 2012):[/b][/size] [size="5"][b](60, -15) URL Segment: lon=-15&lat=60[/b][/size] Congrats to jraenar for finding the hotspot this month! [img]http://i39.tinypic.com/2ngeome.png[/img] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jraenar Posted February 1, 2012 Report Share Posted February 1, 2012 Hacked together a little calculator based on previous discussions in the thread. First guess was just the midpoint of all the possibilities along the line. Adding that point to the originals narrowed it down to six possibilities, with the one I tried having the lowest deviance from the observed line of likelyhood. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chintan Posted February 1, 2012 Report Share Posted February 1, 2012 (edited) [quote name='jraenar' timestamp='1328079767' post='2912412'] Hacked together a little calculator based on previous discussions in the thread. First guess was just the midpoint of all the possibilities along the line. Adding that point to the originals narrowed it down to six possibilities, with the one I tried having the lowest deviance from the observed line of likelyhood. [/quote] Nice! For the range of possible latitudes, did you use -11 to 85? How did you figure out that the latitude can't be over 85? Edited February 1, 2012 by Chintan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chintan Posted February 1, 2012 Report Share Posted February 1, 2012 (edited) Hey, I just figured out that the mars and moon hotspots are related. If you know the mars hotspot, you can find the approximate location of the moon hotspot by adding 30 to the latitude and subtracting 170 if it's over 85, and subtracting 109 from the longitude and adding 360 if it's below -180. i.e. moon hotspot = mars hotspot + (30, -109) mod (170, 360) And of course you can invert that to go from the mars hotspot to the moon hotspot. It's approximate though: the actual hotspot can be off by 1 along each axis. Surprised that no one discovered this earlier. Edited February 1, 2012 by Chintan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jraenar Posted February 1, 2012 Report Share Posted February 1, 2012 (edited) It wasn't so much figure out it can't be over 85/under -85, as noticing that the two linear regressions of previous hotspots have a region of overlap which 'balances' at around there. Where one line gives 85 at a particular longitude, the other gives -84, so I just skip those values. That meshes with the mod 170, as well... I went with +/-85 as bounds because it was even and I figured that the actual line was really a single linear regression put through addition-and-modulus. I couldn't be futzed to figure out what the starting point was, so I just treated it as two and solved. The slope is very close on both (one is about 0.476, other is about 0.466) and is probably the same, only off by error from the points I collected. On second thought, 170/360 = 0.4722222. So that would be the real slope. Interesting observation, I could make a small tweak and get my little calc to pop out either hotspot given a few spread out starting points from either moon or mars. I initially only focused on moon since that's what I have and I could easily test without having to pester people to try things. With the off-by-one, I would guess that it's actually entirely consistent, and will choose the point that is closest tangential distance from the line. Hotspot would be determined by a point on the line, and choosing the closest whole number coordinates to that point. Edited February 1, 2012 by jraenar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pd73bassman Posted February 2, 2012 Report Share Posted February 2, 2012 Thanks guys Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jraenar Posted February 3, 2012 Report Share Posted February 3, 2012 [quote name='Chintan' timestamp='1328093550' post='2912474'] Hey, I just figured out that the mars and moon hotspots are related. If you know the mars hotspot, you can find the approximate location of the moon hotspot by adding 30 to the latitude and subtracting 170 if it's over 85, and subtracting 109 from the longitude and adding 360 if it's below -180. i.e. moon hotspot = mars hotspot + (30, -109) mod (170, 360) And of course you can invert that to go from the mars hotspot to the moon hotspot. It's approximate though: the actual hotspot can be off by 1 along each axis. Surprised that no one discovered this earlier. [/quote] Try running it with modulus (169, 360). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.