Agostinho Neto Posted July 3, 2009 Report Share Posted July 3, 2009 Interview with General Junio Borghese, Milan RAI Journalist: I want to ask questions in two categories, please. Category one would be those questions that I think many, if not most, of Italians would like to have answered about the news of right now. And in category two, more philosophical questions. General, do you intend to restore democracy? Will you abolish the current Provisional Military Government the world has condemned? Generale Junio Borghese: We have committed ourselves to the safety and the salvation of the Italian State, the Italian People. We are the first truly "Italian" nation ever existed. It is on this basis that we have conducted ourselves, and it is on this basis that we will continue to behave. We strongly oppose the spineless who sacrifice their people's identity to join a ridicolous coalition of fake peace-lovers promoting world wars in the name of freedom. The idea is to keep this bulls-*BEEP* out of the mind of our people. RAI Journalist: Generale, do you expect to be attacked by a foreign nation? Generale Junio Borghese: I'm sure you've observed the general life in Italy and you've seen how the people live. They live normally. They get married. They establish relationships. They visit each other. They visit their neighbors. They travel around Italy. They are enjoying life in the manner that life is provided. But at the same time, they also hear the news…because the foreign medias keep talking about how bad Borghese's dictatorship is, about sanctioning Italy's economy.. the sanctions are not working, we are richer than a month ago. The so called "liberators" invaded europe, killed hundred thousands people, and elderly, but they did not push Italy back into the pre-industrial age. The Italians have subsequently reconstructed everything in determination. RAI Journalist: Generale, are you still supported by the masses? Generale Junio Borghese: The people accepted us and accepted the fact of our coup and the principles of our coup, and they have committed themselves to them. The question should be how deeply in strength the regime remains to his commitment to the people, to the basic principles from which we proceeded, and the answer is: I didn't change my mind. RAI Journalist: Thank you General. MALE VOICE: The foreign press may ask questions Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subtleknifewielder Posted July 3, 2009 Report Share Posted July 3, 2009 What "liberators" do you speak of that supposedly slaughtered the elderly and other noncombatants? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agostinho Neto Posted July 3, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 3, 2009 (edited) Generale Junio Borghese: The "Liberators" who invaded Europe to "liberate" its people from the Greater Nordlandic Reich, they bombed cities and killed thousands innocent civilians. Thats why we refuse to open diplomatic relations with them, or with those government who later backstabbed their former allies. We see the deterioration of international politics as a righteous cause for our existance and our government. We are the alternative solution between the GNR and the "Hanseatic" league and its identity-less allies. We do not deny or reject our alliance with the GNR, the flag was never removed from our ministry of foreign affairs, but we recognize the collapse of the mentioned coalition and we decided to move on even without them. Edited July 3, 2009 by Junio Borghese Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subtleknifewielder Posted July 3, 2009 Report Share Posted July 3, 2009 "Please provide evidence that civilians were deliberately targeted by anyone fighting against the GNR. It was not a war of liberation, but a war coming to the defense of those the GNR was unjustly attacking. In any case, these deaths (if indeed it was so many, which we severely doubt), while regretable, were NOT deliberate, but an unfortunate, unstoppable side effect. And if you condemn attacks on civilians, we suppose you also condemn the biological attacks made by Germany, which happened to be a part of the Greater Nordlandic Reich?" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justinian the Mighty Posted July 3, 2009 Report Share Posted July 3, 2009 (edited) "The Moscow Star’s sources indicated that the only fighting that took place during the war was at the border between Nordheim and Mariehamm, where the death toll was fairly low and were mostly soldiers. The majority of the civilians killed during the war were in Brisbane, so, General Borghese, how can you bash the Hansa and their allies, and claim the liberators targeted noncombatants?" Edited July 3, 2009 by Justinian the Mighty Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arkantos Posted July 3, 2009 Report Share Posted July 3, 2009 "We agree with Slavorussia. How can you claim the Coalition targeted civilian targets when most of the civilian casualties that dies in the war are now buried at Elysian Fields?" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agostinho Neto Posted July 3, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 3, 2009 Generale Junio Borghese: What a bunch of hypocritical backstabbers! What were you doing while your beloved Hanseatic leader was leading the Nordlandic Coalition? And when the white cross didn't condemn the aggression against Slavorussia? And the bombing of Molakia and Azerbaijan? What were you people doing while the Nordlandic Coalition was moving eastbound? Towards Russia? You merey closed your eyes or either sided with them! Do i have to remember everyone who was one of the closest friends of Kaiser Martens and Scolar Visari? Guess who! The same person who later condemned the GNR. You people are hypocrit, you forgot how many of you switched side BEFORE and after the formation of the Greater Nordlandic Reich. You let the GNR conquer all Europe and then all of a sudden followed the will of a teenager rockstar, while ignoring small nations getting annexted one by one by the German state that later evolded in what is now known as the "GNR", you "didn't interfere" you "tought it was a good idea to not get involved", hundred thousands of people, soldiers and civilians, buried into the ground - good work, you have failed like nobody else did in the modern history of planet bob. You let them evolve and prospere, then you condemned their actions - it is your fault if you let the GNR expand its territories and influence, then "someone" didn't agree with them anymore, and you all suddenly considered the Nords as evil enemies. Look at yourself, before judging someone else's actions. The croatians, the west-africans, the scandinavians - at some point they all helped and cooperated with the German state, at least once in their existance, you are all guilty - none of you is really innocent. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subtleknifewielder Posted July 3, 2009 Report Share Posted July 3, 2009 (edited) Generale Junio Borghese: What a bunch of hypocritical backstabbers! What were you doing while your beloved Hanseatic leader was leading the Nordlandic Coalition? Protesting that she had, in fact, taken the job. And when the white cross didn't condemn the aggression against Slavorussia? The white cross is a neutral organization established only for humanitarian purposes, not war. And the bombing of Molakia and Azerbaijan? What were you people doing while the Nordlandic Coalition was moving eastbound? Towards Russia? You merey closed your eyes or either sided with them! You need to get your facts straight. The world was poised on the edge of a knife, ready to fight for the Russians. The ComIntern, RUSSIAN, numerous individual nations--and even the Dragon Bloc. The only problem? Slavorussia surrendered before we could get there. Do i have to remember everyone who was one of the closest friends of Kaiser Martens and Scolar Visari? Guess who! The same person who later condemned the GNR. And that is relevent, how? I'll tell you. Uberstein WAS a friend to martens the man, not necessarily any state the man belonged to. He saw what that state was doing, and his eyes were opened just in time. You people are hypocrit, you forgot how many of you switched side BEFORE and after the formation of the Greater Nordlandic Reich. And you, sir, are a hystorical revisionist. Please, name five nations who actually SWITCHED SIDES, as you put it. You let the GNR conquer all Europe and then all of a sudden followed the will of a teenager rockstar, while ignoring small nations getting annexted one by one by the German state that later evolded in what is now known as the "GNR" The only reason GNR expanded across Europe is the lack of ORGANIZED resistance. That 'teenaged rockstar' (and where do you get off insulting her like that?) provided the little push that was necessary. you "didn't interfere" you "tought it was a good idea to not get involved", hundred thousands of people, soldiers and civilians, buried into the ground - good work, you have failed like nobody else did in the modern history of planet bob. You let them evolve and prospere, then you condemned their actions - it is your fault if you let the GNR expand its territories and influence, then "someone" didn't agree with them anymore, and you all suddenly considered the Nords as evil enemies. Look at yourself, before judging someone else's actions. The croatians, the west-africans, the scandinavians - at some point they all helped and cooperated with the German state, at least once in their existance, you are all guilty - none of you is really innocent. So you name three nations. Good. Can you name at least two more who sided with the GNR? We're betting you can't, can you? All your rhetoric amounts to is slander and historical revisionism. OOC: So, people, wadaya think of MY speech? Edited July 3, 2009 by Subtleknifewielder Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agostinho Neto Posted July 4, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 4, 2009 (edited) Generale Junio Borghese: "Opening eyes", let's call it in the way it should be: You ignored the situation in Europe because the nordlandic coalition - at the time - was friend of the Hanseatic league, then the hanseatic league backstabbed them and led this coalition of pointless countries without history and identity to the bloodshed against the GNR and its weapons of mass destruction - good job, hundred thousands of people killed in the name of freedom. You could have stopped the GNR during the preparations of operation Barbarosse - but instead you ignored the saber rattling and just let Slavorussia getting invaded, annexed and disbanded with its government sent to exile in Central Asia, if it was a matter of time how comes THIS time, the bombers were so fast? Let me answer this: Because this time the Hanseatic Coalition was against the GNR, and not "friendly" with them. At least the GNR didn't hide its will to build and empire, the Hanseatic league, at the same time, built an empire - but masking it with freedom and "peace", while they brougt more war around the world than the GNR itself. You want me to mention some backstabbing countries? "Croatia", ready to send 300.000 soldiers in Scandinavia till the last minute of the war, turned anti-nord 10 seconds after dissolution of the GNR - and they condemn our regime for being "evil". Italy may be a new and weak country, but we will never become friends of backstabbers and hypocrits, our economy is well doing, we are meeting all our national needs and the sanctions are not hurting our cash by a cent. We are still here, with the same name, with the same flag, with the same ideas. Edited July 4, 2009 by Junio Borghese Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arkantos Posted July 4, 2009 Report Share Posted July 4, 2009 I love how you called half the world "pointless" and "without history and identity." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maelstrom Vortex Posted July 4, 2009 Report Share Posted July 4, 2009 (edited) "Without history? Without identity?" Maelstrom's voice boomed like thunder he laughed so hard. "Someone needs to send this man to Antarctica with only a few furs, an icepick, a minimal food supply and fishing twine.. then he can learn our history first hand. Maybe he'll even learn how to survive." Edited July 4, 2009 by Maelstrom Vortex Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agostinho Neto Posted July 4, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 4, 2009 I love how you called half the world "pointless" and "without history and identity." Generale Junio Borghese: History is not an opinion, when a country declares war on another country without a casus belli... then we are talking about a pointless country, with no history and identity. It's the failure of politics. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silhouette Posted July 4, 2009 Report Share Posted July 4, 2009 Politcs has only limited usefulness. Some things must be altered with force. When the status quo is no longer effective, change must be sought, and if war is the only way for things to change, so be it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Centurius Posted July 4, 2009 Report Share Posted July 4, 2009 Generale Junio Borghese: "Opening eyes", let's call it in the way it should be: You ignored the situation in Europe because the nordlandic coalition - at the time - was friend of the Hanseatic league, then the hanseatic league backstabbed them and led this coalition of pointless countries without history and identity to the bloodshed against the GNR and its weapons of mass destruction - good job, hundred thousands of people killed in the name of freedom. You could have stopped the GNR during the preparations of operation Barbarosse - but instead you ignored the saber rattling and just let Slavorussia getting invaded, annexed and disbanded with its government sent to exile in Central Asia, if it was a matter of time how comes THIS time, the bombers were so fast? Let me answer this: Because this time the Hanseatic Coalition was against the GNR, and not "friendly" with them. At least the GNR didn't hide its will to build and empire, the Hanseatic league, at the same time, built an empire - but masking it with freedom and "peace", while they brougt more war around the world than the GNR itself. You want me to mention some backstabbing countries? "Croatia", ready to send 300.000 soldiers in Scandinavia till the last minute of the war, turned anti-nord 10 seconds after dissolution of the GNR - and they condemn our regime for being "evil". Italy may be a new and weak country, but we will never become friends of backstabbers and hypocrits, our economy is well doing, we are meeting all our national needs and the sanctions are not hurting our cash by a cent. We are still here, with the same name, with the same flag, with the same ideas. There was hardly any combat during the war, the closest Allied Soldiers were to the GNR was the Southernmost border of at that point Phoenicia and even there a cease fire was quickly declared. In the north the casualties were mainly Mariehamm rather than from nordland let alone Civilians. Post-war counts showed that only in the Hanseatic Commonwealth millions of Civilians died. Get your facts straight. Further while we did in fact side with the devil at the time it worked the best for the Empire organized resistance was already present one that could not develop until the core of the beast was destroyed. Regarding our reasons for considering your regime equal to criminals. We do not make it our duty to find new ways of violating human rights. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Botha Posted July 5, 2009 Report Share Posted July 5, 2009 LUKAS REITZ [TRANSVALER DAAGLIKSE NUUS]: "Herr Generale Borghese, would you and your people be willing to host a visit to your nation by Field Marshal Malan?" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agostinho Neto Posted July 5, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 5, 2009 (edited) LUKAS REITZ [TRANSVALER DAAGLIKSE NUUS]: "Herr Generale Borghese, would you and your people be willing to host a visit to your nation by Field Marshal Malan?" General Junio Borghese: Indeed, we would be pleased. If the Republican Military Government is willing to visit our nation all they have to do is contact the Italian Embassy in Transvaal. Edited July 5, 2009 by Junio Borghese Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Botha Posted July 6, 2009 Report Share Posted July 6, 2009 If the Republican Military Government is willing to visit our nation all they have to do is contact the Italian Embassy in Transvaal. Once the intinery has been confirmed, the RMG will contact the Italian embassy. Malan would like to visit Arctica, Italy, and Tahoe (in that order). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subtleknifewielder Posted July 6, 2009 Report Share Posted July 6, 2009 Generale Junio Borghese: "Opening eyes", let's call it in the way it should be: You ignored the situation in Europe because the nordlandic coalition - at the time - was friend of the Hanseatic league, then the hanseatic league backstabbed them and led this coalition of pointless countries without history and identity to the bloodshed against the GNR and its weapons of mass destruction - good job, hundred thousands of people killed in the name of freedom. "And once again, you completely ignored everything we said. The Hanseatic COMMONWEALTH (why do you insist on calling them 'league?) at no time stabbed anyone in the back. yes, they were friend with the nords for a time, but they made a clean break of it, and were NOT their friends when war was declared. You keep referring to "hundereds of thousands" of people kiled, and refuse to acknowledge that over three million lives were lost. Not caused by the hanseatics, nor their allies, but their enemies. No one can be held responsible for these acts but the ones who ordered the buclear, chemical and biological attacks, and the ones who 'pulled the trigger.' You continue to sprout the ridiculous claim that the civilians who died were responsible for their own sdeaths, and at the same time condemn the nations they belonged to for killing civilians. You sir, are not only a revisionist, apparently, but you set double-standards. You could have stopped the GNR during the preparations of operation Barbarosse - but instead you ignored the saber rattling and just let Slavorussia getting invaded, annexed and disbanded with its government sent to exile in Central Asia, if it was a matter of time how comes THIS time, the bombers were so fast? Let me answer this: Because this time the Hanseatic Coalition was against the GNR, and not "friendly" with them. So, on what grounds could we have stopped them? To the best of everyone's knowledge, they were simply engaging in wargames. You don't attack someone for engaging in wargames, not the last time we checked. Hindsight is always, of course, 20/20. But no one but the Nords had the benefit of that knowledge at that time. they were so fast because the Hanseatics had a province that bordered the Greater Norldandic Reich. That is the ONLY reason they were abole to get there so fast. Perhaps you are incompetant at reading maps, too? At least the GNR didn't hide its will to build and empire, the Hanseatic league, at the same time, built an empire - but masking it with freedom and "peace", while they brougt more war around the world than the GNR itself. You want me to mention some backstabbing countries? "Croatia", ready to send 300.000 soldiers in Scandinavia till the last minute of the war, turned anti-nord 10 seconds after dissolution of the GNR - and they condemn our regime for being "evil". Italy may be a new and weak country, but we will never become friends of backstabbers and hypocrits, our economy is well doing, we are meeting all our national needs and the sanctions are not hurting our cash by a cent. We are still here, with the same name, with the same flag, with the same ideas. Please explain how the Haseatic COMMONWEALTH has brought more war than the GNR? They only participated in ONE conflict in the same time it took GNR and its component states to be involved in at least two or three seperate conflicts. As for Croatia, can they be held accountable? They weren't even a sovereign nation until AFTER the conflict was over. And we asked for five nations. You have named no new ones in this pointless speech. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.