AsianLeader Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 (edited) The alliances DAAN, DOA, GDI, IOTA, and NRM have come together in harmony and made a bloc named The Ultima Accords. Ultima AccordsPreamble: The Democratic Order of Anarchy (hereby referred as DOA), Democratic Armed Alliance of Nations (hereby referred as DAAN), Global Defense Initiative (hereby referred as GDI), and Imperium of the Arctic (hereby referred as IOTA) establish this bloc to promote peace amongst the smaller alliances. Article I: Sovereignty With the signing of this agreement, we, the undersigned, and any future members of this pact, agree that each shall remain sovereign entities, separate from each other in state Government and Affiliation. Article II: Non-Aggression The represented alliances agree not to have any hostilities with each other. If a member of an alliance belonging to these Accords attacks a member nation of another alliance belonging to these Accords, and does not cease and make appropriate reparations within 48 hours, said nation shall be removed from the alliance it belonged to. If the attacks are not condemned by the alliance within 48 hours, it will be taken as the alliance's withdrawal from these Accords. Article III: Membership Any alliance not represented below, who wants to be in this pact, may do so by a unanimous vote from all the alliances within this bloc. Article IV: Tech Deals The alliances represented in this bloc are encouraged, but not required, to do inter alliance tech deals. These tech deals shall be at the rates of $3 mill/100 tech and $1.5 mill/50 tech. Any member failing to do his/her part of the tech deal, shall be punished accordingly. Article V: Defense This Pact is a combination of an Optional Defense and Mutual Defense, it is up to each represented alliance on which one they want. They can change to the other type, given they give a forty eight (48) hour notice to all alliances about the change. Any and all alliances who choose to do the Optional Defense option, must change over to Mutual Defense once their alliance reaches 300,000 Nation Strength. Any and all alliances who have protectorates are required to go to them to request help before coming to alliances within this bloc. All alliances within this bloc who sign the MDP are required to defend any alliance within this bloc who requests help whether it be in the form of military defense (attacking the aggressor), or monetary. If alliance who is asking for help is the aggressor, no alliance within this bloc is required to help them. Article VI: Intelligence If any alliance within this bloc comes across any information that concerns another within this bloc, they shall send the information to the alliance without delay, tamper, and completely. If any alliance is caught withholding, tampering, or delaying in delivering the information, said alliance shall be punished according to the unanimous vote of all other alliances within this bloc. Article VII: Withdrawal If any signatory wishes to withdrawal from this agreement, they are required to tell all the signed alliances and remain neutral by means of aggression against the other signatories for no less than forty-eight hours. During this period of time, this treaty is still in effect. Signed for Mutual Defense Claus: Signed for DOA: AsianLeader- Council Member Arkzist- Council Member Spark8989- Council Member Signed for IOTA: Lavatron- Imperator Gwonam- Triumvirate Moto71- Triumvirate Panopatican- Triumvirate El Cid- Minister of Foreign Affairs Signed for Optional Defense Clause: Signed for DAAN Kelvin- Vice Chancellor The Larch- Minsiter of Foreign Affairs KING CROWE- Chancellor LEPPY- Minsiter of Internal Affairs Signed for NRM Krishna- Emperor BrandenB- Praetor Signed for GDI: RyanGDI - Supreme Commander McSlaveson- Trade Director and Head of Immigrations 70srock - Minister of Foreign Affairs Edited June 8, 2009 by AsianLeader Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheStig Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 (edited) Congratulations on this treaty. And yes, we'll still be kicking you in our channel AsianLeader. EDIT: Wow. A first. Edited June 8, 2009 by TheStig Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duckz3 Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 Interesting to say the least. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ninja Colt Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 So, where's WKE's mention and signatures? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Keshav IV Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 Good Luck not failing like the earlier bloc monsieur Ryan set up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsianLeader Posted June 8, 2009 Author Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 So, where's WKE's mention and signatures? From what I understood from Kobi, they wanted to pull out. Now, if I am mistaken, please have him message me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bower3aj Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 why isn't GDI in the pre-amble? Did you sign this without them? CoMA prevails... sarcasm? oh and WKE not signing... fail bloc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Diorno Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 I HAVE NOTHING BUT HIGH EXPECTATIONS. O/ RYANGDI Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Uruk Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 Yeah, this is likely to fail. Good luck, though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bower3aj Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 also... Mutual Defense Claus ftw! just in case this person doesn't want the attention for their quote I will leave it nameless until the claim it in here... "I wonder if Mutual Defense Claus is like Santa's more security minded brother" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raasaa Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 looks like CoMA 2.0 to me...... all the best to you chaps....i hope this works out better than CoMA..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonathan Archer Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 Brilliant political move? Good luck with this guys. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorgrum Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 Excellent, this has a lot of potential going forward, for all of us ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshgazza1992 Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 Signed for Optional Defense Clause:Signed for DAAN Kelvin- Vice Chancellor The Larch- Minsiter of Foreign Affairs KING CROWE- Chancellor LEPPY- Minsiter of Internal Affairs Signed for NRM Krishna- Emperor BrandenB- Praetor Signed for GDI: RyanGDI - Supreme Commander McSlaveson- Trade Director and Head of Immigrations 70srock - Minister of Foreign Affairs Why? an optional defense pact is the most annoying, pointless treaty in Cybernations. Especially in a bloc. If you're going to be devoted to them and defend them sign a MDP, if you're not... then don't sign anything! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Xander the Only Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 CoMa 2.0? Yikes. Good luck with this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alfred von Tirpitz Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 This reads more like a base PIAT, with some agreeing to a MDP and others to an ODP. its almost as if there were bilateral treaties being signed, you all discovered that, and decided to save some paper. Anyways, wish you the best with this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alexander III Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 Ultima Accords = but also Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ricardo Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 The only asian leader is chinatownbus. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hizzy Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 One of the alliances in the preamble (which i assume makes it a founding alliance, more or less) didn't even sign the actual treaty. What the hell? And what does "remain neutral by means of aggression" mean? Are you aggressively neutral? Or moderately aggressive? WHAT IS GOING ON Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaitlinK Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 Why? an optional defense pact is the most annoying, pointless treaty in Cybernations. Especially in a bloc. If you're going to be devoted to them and defend them sign a MDP, if you're not... then don't sign anything! Shhhh... Its with RyanGDI they need to protect themselves somehow if they are going to be allied to them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sethb Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 This is confusing... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alfred von Tirpitz Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 One of the alliances in the preamble (which i assume makes it a founding alliance, more or less) didn't even sign the actual treaty. What the hell? And what does "remain neutral by means of aggression" mean? Are you aggressively neutral? Or moderately aggressive? WHAT IS GOING ON Beats me, i guess we have to wait for a Stumpy tl;dr; Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ejayrazz Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 "This Pact is a combination of an Optional Defense and Mutual Defense, it is up to each represented alliance on which one they want. They can change to the other type, given they give a forty eight (48) hour notice to all alliances about the change." Stating it is an optional defense clause is good enough, no need for the mutual defense, that is implied in itself with an optional clause. So this is an ODP bloc? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minilla Island Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 When you sign a Bloc-type treaty, you have to give it some purpose. Either it is an Economic Bloc, or an MDAP Bloc where economics is part. This, my friends, make ZERO sense. You even included a non-signatory in the preamble! That alone should tell people how serious you guys really are. Not very is the answer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frocony Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 Congrats and good luck Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.