Lehran Posted April 28, 2009 Report Share Posted April 28, 2009 Cataclysm and The Brotherhood of The Dragon are hereby under the protection of The Fellowship. A raid on them will result in the same defensive maneuvers as a raid on The Fellowship. Don't flame me, they're friends and we all know what happens to small alliances here if someone isn't looking out for them... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaiser Indie Posted April 28, 2009 Report Share Posted April 28, 2009 Protectorates... In TE... I Disapprove. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GOONS Posted April 28, 2009 Report Share Posted April 28, 2009 Protectorates... In TE... I Disapprove. I concur. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lehran Posted April 28, 2009 Author Report Share Posted April 28, 2009 Gimme a break...it's not like I'm forming a bloc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaiser Indie Posted April 28, 2009 Report Share Posted April 28, 2009 Gimme a break...it's not like I'm forming a bloc You never know, grooming all these small alliances to become part of a Fellowship Uber Block Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lehran Posted April 28, 2009 Author Report Share Posted April 28, 2009 (edited) You never know, grooming all these small alliances to become part of a Fellowship Uber Block Yeah I bet you're all terrified :lol: Edited April 28, 2009 by NeoGandalf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Owned-You Posted April 28, 2009 Report Share Posted April 28, 2009 Good luck, I personally don't like protectorates either...but I'm like that in SE & TE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WileyXero Posted April 28, 2009 Report Share Posted April 28, 2009 Sweet, now i finally have little buddies under my wing! Does seem kinda odd protecting an alliance, none the less two of them, in TE. O well.. o/ TF o/ Protectorates Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Uruk Posted April 28, 2009 Report Share Posted April 28, 2009 )): Treaties in general )): Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The fox Posted April 28, 2009 Report Share Posted April 28, 2009 I agree with the above posters, Treaties do not belong in TE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lehran Posted April 28, 2009 Author Report Share Posted April 28, 2009 *Sigh* We have one treaty for 2 rounds when the majority of alliances are circled by them and now this...I'm not a trend follower and just because this round happens to be anti-treaty, I'm not saying no to my friends. For the record it is a one-sided treaty - we defend them, they are in no way obligated to return the favor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Uruk Posted April 28, 2009 Report Share Posted April 28, 2009 *Sigh* We have one treaty for 2 rounds when the majority of alliances are circled by them and now this...I'm not a trend follower and just because this round happens to be anti-treaty, I'm not saying no to my friends.For the record it is a one-sided treaty - we defend them, they are in no way obligated to return the favor. Most rounds have at least two anti-treaty alliances, for the record. Namely IDIOT and NAAC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lehran Posted April 28, 2009 Author Report Share Posted April 28, 2009 Indeed and most rounds have been ruled by a block like the initiative or judgment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elric Posted April 29, 2009 Report Share Posted April 29, 2009 NeoGandalf- I would like to thank you and the members of the Fellowship for agreeing to help us as we get started. Despite the minimal negative feedback, what you are doing for us is very honorable. We of the Brotherhood salute you! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlaricTheGreat Posted April 29, 2009 Report Share Posted April 29, 2009 We do indeed thank you, and appreciate the willingness to offer your protection. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
popsumpot Posted April 29, 2009 Report Share Posted April 29, 2009 Your "one" treaty was a bloc treaty... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lehran Posted April 29, 2009 Author Report Share Posted April 29, 2009 (edited) No, it was with TPF. If you check back on the initiative's DOE you will not find TF there. Needless to say, we did what we felt we had to do because we had heard we were going to be hit by more than one alliance. Which brings me back to my initial point. The other block, I was a victim of - 6 slots for 14 days. I nearly can't believe the memory loss everyone seems to have concerning that part we have almost all played in treaties. Edited April 29, 2009 by NeoGandalf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr hairy Ballz Posted April 30, 2009 Report Share Posted April 30, 2009 I like it Gandalf. o/ NEOGANDALF o/ The Fellowship Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Uruk Posted April 30, 2009 Report Share Posted April 30, 2009 No, it was with TPF. If you check back on the initiative's DOE you will not find TF there. Yet you wanted to claim that you were in the Initiative, no? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lehran Posted May 2, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 2, 2009 Here is the thread announcing The Initiative. The Fellowship is not mentioned. http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=51278 and on a separate thread I make my position very clear http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?s...51499&st=20 To save you time finding it... '...There was a movement called The Initiative and we were part of it. After the initial strike the initiative was formalized as an entity and we weren't part of that. For The Fellowship, The Initiative was a means to an end, and that end has come for the time-being. I've made it no secret that I think TE suffers from being swamped by too many treaties. The Fellowship did not hide behind anyone. A mutual threat was perceived, sides were picked, things escalated and we acted. TPF would have fared less well without TF, just as we would have fared less well without them...' Can we let this drop now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcboy Posted May 2, 2009 Report Share Posted May 2, 2009 Protectorates... In TE... I Disapprove. word... epic post right there! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burning Glory Posted May 4, 2009 Report Share Posted May 4, 2009 (edited) Protectorates... In TE... I Disapprove. Good luck, I personally don't like protectorates either...but I'm like that in SE & TE. LOL, well TPF has 3 protectorates..... NVO, RF, and a secrete one Look at it like this, if all of the small AA's were raided to death then they would just join bigger AA's and most of the tech raiding will stop and wars will dwindle......Well maybe not but its good to help friends anyway Here is the thread announcing The Initiative. The Fellowship is not mentioned.http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=51278 and on a separate thread I make my position very clear http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?s...51499&st=20 To save you time finding it... '...There was a movement called The Initiative and we were part of it. After the initial strike the initiative was formalized as an entity and we weren't part of that. For The Fellowship, The Initiative was a means to an end, and that end has come for the time-being. I've made it no secret that I think TE suffers from being swamped by too many treaties. The Fellowship did not hide behind anyone. A mutual threat was perceived, sides were picked, things escalated and we acted. TPF would have fared less well without TF, just as we would have fared less well without them...' Can we let this drop now? Neo, don't worry about it....You guys are friends of TPF no matter the round or the reason or the outcome. No need to defend your stance on things, your treaties, or why it happened. What happened, happened for a reason and it was fun. Stay cool! BG. O Edited May 4, 2009 by Burning Glory Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lehran Posted May 4, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 4, 2009 (edited) You know me BG - always cool. I was just playing my po-face I basically edit everything I post but I wanted to add that it's good to see you back in public! Edited May 4, 2009 by NeoGandalf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Believland Posted May 5, 2009 Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 )): Treaties in general )): Didn't you sign off on the first bloc of TE? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lehran Posted May 5, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 Still here Beazy! Don't go... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts