Flonker Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 she tries to get thingsout of men that she can't get because she's not 15% prettier "15%" by Richard Brautigan [ooc]And here I was thinking I was the only one who's heard of Richard Brautigan around here.[/ooc] Interesting development here, Gramlins. Good luck. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dilber Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 Nice jab, especially as you . Dilber you can do better. I'm assuming it based off the information I have. Unless Karma decided on terms already, you would be in violation of your Codex. It's entirely possible they have been, but since I'm not privy to them, I can only comment on what I know. It was meant to be an informative post since the chaining clause is not in effect for aggressive actions. I've always argued you should do what's necessary, so I'm not condemning you for it. It's not like we all didn't know this was coming. For all your moral superiority, you've always been willing to use war when it suits your interest, and this clearly does. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dilber Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 Not be an e-lawyer but Peace terms have to be DISCUSSED...not decided upon..Carry On the exact goal of the war has been defined is part of the clause as well. In a case like this, peace terms go hand and hand with it, especially as Gramlins is acting as part of a coalition. I personally don't care for E-lawyering, and they can do what the hell they want. I just found it interesting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ejayrazz Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 (edited) I'm assuming it based off the information I have. Unless Karma decided on terms already, you would be in violation of your Codex. It's entirely possible they have been, but since I'm not privy to them, I can only comment on what I know. It was meant to be an informative post since the chaining clause is not in effect for aggressive actions. I've always argued you should do what's necessary, so I'm not condemning you for it. It's not like we all didn't know this was coming. For all your moral superiority, you've always been willing to use war when it suits your interest, and this clearly does. It seemed more so as a job rather than 'informative', but misguiding post. Edited April 24, 2009 by Ejayrazz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steelrat Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 o/ Gramlins 15 war update blitz. Yep, at the moment there isn´t more we can do. We are so bad, really. No one is active in Grämlins, we are all !@#$%* warriors, we have no warchests... hell we may even have know clue what we are doing. ^^ Satisfied? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dilber Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 Hehe.It seemed more so as a job rather than 'informative', but misguiding. I'm also correct on that statement that you bolded as well. The earlier great wars, and the BLEU war come to mind. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dilber Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 Oh the shame, the shame. But then again why do you care, you're probably going to quit after this anyway. I get a challenge again, and get to be crotchety. You guys made it so I'm probably going to stay to wreak havoc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BDRocks Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 I know the rest of Gre not in war must be pining for Iron's top 200 to get out and FIGHT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ejayrazz Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 (edited) I'm also correct on that statement that you bolded as well. The earlier great wars, and the BLEU war come to mind. Yes, it's in my interest to help FARK, my treatied partner. You caught me. Carry on. Edited April 24, 2009 by Ejayrazz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dilber Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 (edited) Yes, it's in my interest to help FARK, my treatied partner. You caught me. Carry on. I'm not arguing against it. I agree with your actions. All I'm saying is your !@#$ stinks as much as the rest of ours does, and there's no reason to pretend otherwise. Edited April 24, 2009 by Dilber Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TBRaiders Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 I'm not arguing against it. I agree with your actions. All I'm saying is your !@#$ stinks as much as the rest of ours does, and there's no reason to pretend otherwise. I know mine does, especially on burrito night. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ejayrazz Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 (edited) I'm not arguing against it. I agree with your actions. All I'm saying is your !@#$ stinks as much as the rest of ours does. We are not moral police. We are what we are. We are not superior. Dude, we are ugly !@#$@#$ creatures. We wished to help, hence optional clauses. My !@#$ doesn't smell because I have yet to commit some acts your own alliance has, nor have I actively blocked players from playing this game, especially when Moo and Bakunin have different views on what PZI really means. (Reference: WarriorConcept). Our !@#$ isn't as bad. Still smells, but yours has corn particles. Haha. ;] Edited April 24, 2009 by Ejayrazz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lokie Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 the exact goal of the war has been defined is part of the clause as well. In a case like this, peace terms go hand and hand with it, especially as Gramlins is acting as part of a coalition. I personally don't care for E-lawyering, and they can do what the hell they want. I just found it interesting. To my knowledge NPO was offered peace terms was my information not correct? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Earogema Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 o/ Gramlins 15 war update blitz. Hey, remember me? That 2k ns nation that you still can't keep down. Sup? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
o ya baby Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 I'm not arguing against it. I agree with your actions. All I'm saying is your !@#$ stinks as much as the rest of ours does, and there's no reason to pretend otherwise. Oh, the tears... they're so delicious... o/ Gramlins. Take these losers out once and for all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dilber Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 To my knowledge NPO was offered peace terms was my information not correct? And then denied them from us after they were accepted. Furthermore, I'm guessing that this would refer for the entire coalition, due to later clauses in the codex. Like I said, I don't really care either way, since E-lawyering is dumb. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dilber Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 Oh, the tears... they're so delicious... o/ Gramlins. Take these losers out once and for all. I don't see me Baaaaawing anywhere. I've already said I agree with their actions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RandomInterrupt Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 I get a challenge again, and get to be crotchety. You guys made it so I'm probably going to stay to wreak havoc. Ah, this statement is almost adorable. Karmically speaking, I assume you'll be removed from the NPO forever and probably forbidden from holding a leadership or advisory position in any other alliance. When you do gain a position of that sort, your alliance will be threatened until you are placed in permanent retirement. Again, this is just speaking on the concept of Karma. I'm sure no one would be vindictive enough to treat you as you have treated others... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aeternos Astramora Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 Matt Miller vs. Motu plox! I propose an honor duel between #1 and #2. No other people declare on either. 1-on-1. Matt Miller is going to have his hands full. This. Also, please stop calling IRON "RON". Many names doesn't make sense. NPO/NpO? Not new, but I don't see anybody calling them OPO and OpO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doitzel Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 Ah, this statement is almost adorable. Karmically speaking, I assume you'll be removed from the NPO forever and probably forbidden from holding a leadership or advisory position in any other alliance. When you do gain a position of that sort, your alliance will be threatened until you are placed in permanent retirement.Again, this is just speaking on the concept of Karma. I'm sure no one would be vindictive enough to treat you as you have treated others... In before Dilber denies he had anything to do with it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lokie Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 I'm guessing I'm assuming I'm assuming So then you really you have no idea then? It just seems to me that you are doing a bunch of guessing and assuming...which normally gets you nowhere. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vulkan Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 Looks like IRON drew the short straw. :lol: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heft Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 Also, please stop calling IRON "RON". Many names doesn't make sense. NPO/NpO? Not new, but I don't see anybody calling them OPO and OpO. The otter is correct. "RON" is failtrolling of the highest degree. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trace Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 Also, please stop calling IRON "RON". Many names doesn't make sense. NPO/NpO? Not new, but I don't see anybody calling them OPO and OpO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dilber Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 (edited) Ah, this statement is almost adorable. Karmically speaking, I assume you'll be removed from the NPO forever and probably forbidden from holding a leadership or advisory position in any other alliance. When you do gain a position of that sort, your alliance will be threatened until you are placed in permanent retirement.Again, this is just speaking on the concept of Karma. I'm sure no one would be vindictive enough to treat you as you have treated others... In which case, I get to laugh in that they become just as bad as I ever was, and get to be more crotchety then sponge, since I'll have nothing to lose. Also, I'd get to form my own "freedom fighting" group, and piss of the new ruling powers. Edited April 24, 2009 by Dilber Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.