mhawk Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 (edited) I'm a bit confused at TPF's numbers, given neither the war number nor the membership number (66) is remotely close. Edited April 24, 2009 by mhawk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Death II Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 Nemesis - Defying logic, one blitz at a time Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Obiwan Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 you have to be lenient on sparta since they entered a little late, and I'm sure most of NPO's slots were already full. look at nemesis! I think it would be better at how many nations update blitzed as opposed to # of blitz wars but I know that would have been extremely hard to count, props Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimmy2e Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 Your chart is wrong for Hegemony. Yellow is between 20 - 40.. MCXA, Legion, and NATO should be yellow. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LJ Scott Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 102% blitz rate? Impressive. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canik Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 FEAR is doing well so far. Pretty decent blitz too. We're doing our part. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The General Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 Very nice, however RAD has not officialy entered the war. So they have not technicaly blitzed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vend3tta Posted April 24, 2009 Author Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 Honestly it's a pretty poor statistic the way you're coming up with these percentages, it should be calculated based on targets that a declaring alliance had.As an example NPO with 930 nations declared on OV with around 60 nations (I believe about 12 of those were in PM) so there's no possible way they could have gotten a good stat there. Add to that the fact that they were sharing targets with TORN. It should be based on how many available targets were engaged, not how many nations were in the attacking alliance. Valid concern. However, many alliances declared on multiple targets, making your suggestion near impossible to implement. NPO, being the opening attacker, is the only alliance affected on a significant level by this. However, I noted their poor stat in my analysis below. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adrian LaCroix Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 I think there is a strategy in not full out blitzing throwing out these stats I would agree with this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vend3tta Posted April 24, 2009 Author Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 Your chart is wrong for Hegemony. Yellow is between 20 - 40.. MCXA, Legion, and NATO should be yellow. Thanks - fixed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heggo Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 (edited) These stats don't mean much of anything as presented. For starters, the percentages you give are only equal to 1/3 of the percentage of the available offensive wars. Second of all, you don't remove the peace mode alliances from that figure, meaning we can't really gauge the efficiency of any blitz attack from these stats. Third, what is the optimal percentage of offensive slots used, anyway? Fourth, it doesn't consider the number of available targets. Edited April 24, 2009 by heggo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrewbw Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 I don't quite agree with this, because there is such a thing as limited engagement. Interesting stats to say the least though, thanks for them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vend3tta Posted April 24, 2009 Author Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 I'm a bit confused at TPF's numbers, given neither the war number nor the membership number (66) is remotely close. Wowza. Not sure how I got that wrong. Fixed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbrownso Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 Another thing this information indicates is more long-term planning and cohesion. I'm not surprised that Karma has better blitz numbers. There was an substantial amount of confusion on the "Hegemony" side of the war and I'm sure that had an effect as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Virillus Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 I should point out that GR managed that number with 110 nations in peace mode;) In reality, we're around 80% Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marcus Bellator Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 (edited) You have forgotten Dark Fist in these stats, we have declared 60 seconds after NATO declared war on our allies, and considering the preparation i have seen from inside, we should have done more then 90% blitzes =) http://www.cybernations.net/allNations_dis...nce=Dark%20Fist http://www.cybernations.net/search_wars.as...yallexact=exact Obviously only 16 nations are allowed to fight this war. Orders are orders =) Edited April 24, 2009 by Marcus Bellator Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drostan Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 For alliances that are only fighting NPO unless they got in early they are probably having trouble finding slots... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Midkn1ght Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 No. I looked at the first declaration an alliance had on their target, noted the time, then counted the number of offensive wars the alliance declared within 12 hours.It's... a tedious process. No joke. Nice job. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Finch Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 For alliances that are only fighting NPO unless they got in early they are probably having trouble finding slots... Probably because NPO has like 400 nations in peace mode or something. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vend3tta Posted April 24, 2009 Author Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 Probably because NPO has like 400 nations in peace mode or something. 143. You're close, though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 Nemesis hacks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Flinders Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 102% blitz rate?Impressive. Most things about Nemesis are impressive. Also, our allies are awesome. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yawoo Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 Nemesis hacks. It's true, we do. When Nemesis commits itself to something, it's done with over 100% Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fort Pitt Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 MK had the best blitz by far Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bellisus Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 Avalanche should be coded yellow, with 22 percent and change. You have us red. But really quite good overall. Great idea. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.