kingzog Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 I find it rather hilarious that iFOK's blitz last night lasted longer and did more damage than GGA's attempt at a blitz. This is our first war as an alliance. :v LSR has 27 members and we launched 42 offensive wars last night. I think that's pretty darn good. And yes, better than GGA. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jackalope Despot Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 /O GGA! why yes I'm a mindless hailer... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jstep Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 Does the GGA at least TRY to inform their members on tips of war? More bombers = More damage? Doin it rite. we'll certainly know if you ever leak a screenshot Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AirMe Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 (edited) Here is some food for thought.....for all those alliances that canceled on NPO originally..... Making your ally look like a fool in public, no matter what they do, is no way to treat your allies. You can tout 1V all you want, but when you kill the morale of your ally, who is fighting a war WITHOUT YOU, for a few hours by making them think they have just been abandoned by all their allies because you want to prove a point to them, makes you guys a terrible ally. Edited April 24, 2009 by AirMe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hornguard Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 I loved the blitz last night...'twas amusing to see 30 declarations. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WcaesarD Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 (edited) I think former ASC members, Fark, and RIA would care to disagree with that statement Let's ask SuperFriends about your last showing and war and see who's right. Have I mentioned how much I love you guys? o/ SF o/ ASC! Hail the victorious dead! And GGA, I have no wars from you guys, come find me, I'll turn y'all into a Glowing Green Alliance Edit: Spelling Edited April 24, 2009 by WCaesarD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gen Lee Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 (most of whom wouldn't have attacked the NPO alone and thus waited until there were 7 other DoW's up, which sort of presents a bit of an hypocrisy). veridicide much? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cable77 Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 That's only because they jumped us when we were already fighting a far larger opponent GOONS and they withdrew even faster. Riiiight. So that's why when I attacked your Minister of Defense, Minister of Education, and some other guy I can't even remember I anarchied all three without nukes, stole a buttload of tech, won every ground battle, and endured a brutal counter offensive of ONE cruise missile. You guys were so glad to be rid of us that you agreed to "reps" that only covered like a third of the value of the tech we stole. Well, it's nice to finally see the view from your side of the story. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nomadd917 Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 All I have to say is that GGA is an embarrassment to war. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildeKaard Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 I do believe I will continue to Pontificate, the fact that you canceled the MADP and yet tout One Vision is total "ZOMG lulz GGa" As I said, please continue to be a mindless troll, but I do thank you for proving my point that the logs were meaningless to your argument thereby counting yourself as one of the mindless mob. Hope and Change baby... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SynthFG Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 Does the GGA at least TRY to inform their members on tips of war? More bombers = More damage? Doin it rite. What the hell is that skin And you mean that 50 Bombers don't do 50x the damage of 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rajistani Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 What the hell is that skinAnd you mean that 50 Bombers don't do 50x the damage of 1 I am pretty sure thats sarcastic, but I'll answer anyways. If you have level 9 planes, 5 bombers can do max infra damage. But 50 level ones > 49 level ones... but you really should check if they have defending fighters fight Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SynthFG Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 I am pretty sure thats sarcastic, but I'll answer anyways.If you have level 9 planes, 5 bombers can do max infra damage. But 50 level ones > 49 level ones... but you really should check if they have defending fighters fight This really is more difficult without the alliance tags isn't it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elric Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 OK, the Leroy Jenkins thing was pretty funny! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AVFC1 Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 I am pretty sure thats sarcastic, but I'll answer anyways.If you have level 9 planes, 5 bombers can do max infra damage. But 50 level ones > 49 level ones... but you really should check if they have defending fighters fight 1 level 9 can do max damage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dejarue Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 I tend to send two just to be safe, but I don't have any faith that it's necessary. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.