boscher Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 Strategy. It was all of their plans. MCXA claimed it was a mistake and they changed minds, why should it be any different for OG. Not judging just asking because if it was a strategy it backfired. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael the Squirrel Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 And flip flopper #2 come on down! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krull Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 The only strategy involved at all in this was calling the flop a strategy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Janova Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 This saddens me, but you have to do what you have to do. May you get out of the war quickly and intact. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emperor Brutus Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 Not the best DoW, as i am not happy by this one... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fixxx Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 MCXA claimed it was a mistake and they changed minds, why should it be any different for OG. Not judging just asking because if it was a strategy it backfired. Sometimes getting across a message needs harsh actions, it clearly didn't have the anticipated effect, I applaud OG for still honouring their treaty. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Khyber Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 o/ OG. And for those hypocrates, be careful when your on the fireing line next lest your actions now become your downfall. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
der_ko Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 (edited) o/ OG. And for those hypocrates, be careful when your on the fireing line next lest your actions now become your downfall. A lot of us have already been on the fireing line multiple times. Edited April 23, 2009 by der_ko Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ceremony Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 The sharper nations realized early on that there can be more than one military treaty between two alliances. Attacking in concert with an ally, and attacking an ally's attackers - these can be two separate treaties. Canceling one does not affect the other, but it does send a strong message to the cancel-ee. Brilliant political move Reyne and all that, see you on the battlefield! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The General Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 (edited) I don’t understand, was it all strategy or did you change your mind after the cancelation? They changed their minds after the world called them every name in the book. They let their emotions get the best of them and took the bait. Everyone in Karma is kinda LOL'd at them (along with all the others that ran). Ofcourse - they will try to deny it and claim it was planned. None of this was planned. I've seen the IRC logs, I'm sure the logs will come out in public soon enough. You ran like pansies, then felt stupid, so you did a 180, and will now get your asses handed to you for it. I have nothing personal against OG, but when an alliance dosen't own up to what they did, and then try to make excuses and coverups for it- well, what can I say - It speaks volumes about their character. Edited April 23, 2009 by The General Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadow Khan Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 (edited) Strategy. It was all of their plans. If it was, no one was surprised. So in summary, if this was planned, it's probably one of the worst stratagems ever and is very deserving of the name "Strategery" Edited April 23, 2009 by Shadow Khan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prince Yvl Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 Say they WERE, indeed, using this "strategically," though everything I've been hearing says otherwise. It's still a damn poor strategy. Not one of Karma's alliances let their guard down. NPO got pummeled, nations surrendered within hours, not to mention all of TORN. The political loss of the Coalition of Cowards is nearly immeasurable - there's still no proof (which should be easy to come by) that you AREN'T a team of cowards and flip-floppers, and any future allies will think twice before joining your side. There was absolutely no benefit in this "strategy," and it likely cost you the war. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vicea Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 There is politics and there is membership/friendship, after some serious doubts about the whole situation I look forward to meet GR on the battlefields. We all now pinguins are far more cuddly then pit vipers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poyplemonkeys Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 You're doing the right thing OG Have fun. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SilverHawk Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 Who cares who did what for what reason, there is war and everybody is happy or getting their revenge thang on or whatever. Trollin isn't very classy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Great Dzar Posted April 25, 2009 Report Share Posted April 25, 2009 Can't win with you then. Good luck Reyne Always good to see FQ make an appearance. Mine are not the reasons of revelry, but matters more grounded. For to battle at all is mettle most tested. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.