The Poet Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 Because this thread is totally serious, Dilber... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Londo Mollari Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 Athens will not be party to imposing a viceroy on any alliance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingzog Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 oh, I'm not saying it wasn't good gameplay. I'm saying you lot are just as bad as we were, and will probably become worse over time.I'm going to enjoy watching it. I thought you said you were quitting CN? (btw....I'm astounded that anyone is taking this thread seroiusly) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foolbettarecaniz Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 (edited) Admin.Having a Viceroy is against the game's ToS. lies. all lies --->Points to sig edit: it used to say I was GATO viceroy, at one time Edited April 23, 2009 by Foolbettarecaniz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mentor Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 I do not think there should be a Viceroy in this or any other game, forums are the intellectual property of the alliance which created them and have a real life financial value, also having one will contradict the all those complaints people had towards the NPO. Either way i do not think the NPO would agree to anything like that anyway Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Dan Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 There won't be a viceroy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goose Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 I'd vote for King Arthur II Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vyper Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 I'd vote for King Arthur II thiis... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamthey Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 This is definately one of the more progressive plans I have seen... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geiseric Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 Though I doubt there'll ever be a viceroy on the spirit of the conflict against NPO, well,... Karma demands to atleast discuss of the possibility of who (y'know karma she a -, shut yer mouth, y'know amma talkin bout karma). Atleast for the lulz. mpol maybe. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minilla Island Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 Last I checked Viceroys are illegal in CN, as you have to give some control to personal RL property. The forcible giving of RL property is illegal as was dictated over a year ago. That means giving someone Admin access to someone's personal property. But, if there is a viceroy, I would say Van Hoo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James IV Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 I think if one was to occur, it should be mpol. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Virillus Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 Bearing in mind that there will be no Viceroy. I think Theblitz (who just came back) would be humorous;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nonvalid Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 Pointless thread. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Speer Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 How about no one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Gerry Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 Mr. Speer is correct. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GTTofAK Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 Last I checked Viceroys are illegal in CN, as you have to give some control to personal RL property. The forcible giving of RL property is illegal as was dictated over a year ago. That means giving someone Admin access to someone's personal property. But, if there is a viceroy, I would say Van Hoo. I'd say the in rule goes further than just admin acess. The rule boils down to using in game means to leverage real life property. Leveraging an alliance to give someone even simple membership status would also in my opinion be a violation of that rule. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Janova Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 Karma won't be imposing a viceroy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Andrew IV Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 Karma won't be imposing a viceroy True, but if they did mpol, Ivan Moldavi, Doitzel, & Electron Sponge all come to mind Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sodom gomorrah Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 I say we make vox/fan ruling council and give them one week to do anything they want. that's be worse than any war. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azaghul Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 (edited) We have absolute power? *chuckles*We are very good at what we do, but there is only one God and He is Admin. I'm expecting quite a bit of political instability once this war ends. And that's a good thing, it makes things interesting. OOC: I like your sig, it made me laugh. Edited April 23, 2009 by Azaghul Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Srqt Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 (edited) Guess I've misread all the bloodlust on the boards, compiled with the actions that if we do them they're bad, but if you do them, they're just. I guess we need to redefine the word. Oh Dilber I know you know better than that. You are taking the pent up aggression of base level members that have been beaten up and put under harsh terms multiple times and then trying to label them as hypocrites? This is war Dilber and just because we are the moral side does not mean that we will not wage it to the best of our ability, we will bring our A game just like I know you know we should. The true show of the difference between Karma and the Hegemony will be when Karma wins this war and we all see the terms that are given and the way the alliances of Karma handle being in a position of power. I understand your need to spin this but also know you have better spin in you than that. Edit: and also a bit off topic but you guys are really going with Dogma? Really? That is perhaps the wost propaganda line I have ever seen, not only because it is ridiculously cheesy in how you are applying it but because calling yourself Dogma implies such arrogance and a sense of entitlement. Basically calling yourself that says that you agree with all the things we say about you. Edited April 23, 2009 by KingSrqt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alterego Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 Karma won't be imposing a viceroy Viceroy is so 2008. What will be the new name for the position? Im betting on Interim Liaison Officer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mpol777 Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 Guess I've misread all the bloodlust on the boards... *snip*. I'd simply like to point out that FAN had bloodlust before bloodlust was cool. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cuatela Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 (edited) This is war Dilber and just because we are the moral side does not mean that we will not wage it to the best of our ability, we will bring our A game just like I know you know we should. Yes, because people with morals pretend to have peace negotiations, then back out at the last second and let the second wave attack. That makes a lot of sense, doesn't it? Last I checked, that was called "lying". Edited April 23, 2009 by Cuatela Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.