shilo Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 (edited) So just to be clear, you suspended ORRPLE because you think Legion is a puppet of the New Pacific Order? Don't worry, I'm sure you will find many that agree with you. Suspending some treaties and keeping others must have been a tough. Especially suspending a treaty that has been honored time after time by the Orange Defense Network. To be clear: no We followed our heart when we chose to support our friends on the Karma side. Legion is almost solely bound to the Hegemony side. While we might have wished that they would fight with us against Hegemony, that was unrealistic. So Legion followed their heart when they went with the side they have treaties with. Meaning two friends ended up on opposite sides, not because either one is controlled by anyone, but because they simply did what they think was right. That does not change the friendship. Edit: lol at Soviet grammar Nazis Edited April 23, 2009 by shilo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Umar ibn Abd al-Aziz Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 Quick query, apologies if it's been answered already. The OP says ODN will be standing by it's defensive treaty with the Internationale. Given that NATO has gone to war with the Internationale, will the ODN be fulfilling their obligations to the Internationale, as per the OP? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
voodoochild Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 Quick query, apologies if it's been answered already. The OP says ODN will be standing by it's defensive treaty with the Internationale. Given that NATO has gone to war with the Internationale, will the ODN be fulfilling their obligations to the Internationale, as per the OP? ODN holds a PIAT with NATO. A treaty with a non-aggression clause. I am not in government, but it looks like the answer is no. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sovyet Gelibolu Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 ODN holds a PIAT with NATO. A treaty with a non-aggression clause.I am not in government, but it looks like the answer is no. /me checks NATO's performance in the war, the number of nations INT has in reserve, the number of allies that have already declared on our behalf. I'd be surprised if ODN could find slots Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Venizelos Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 (edited) we won't attack alliances with which we have treaties with non-agression clauses, but there's enough alliances in this war that we don't have such treaties with :jihad: Edited April 23, 2009 by Venizelos Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpoiL Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 (edited) x Edited July 19, 2010 by SpoiL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vijaya Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 This, I like. A lot. Good work, ODN! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lazyox Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 Yes, because canceling one MADP when they have two more MDoAPs means they won't defend their allies Now, go away, you failed first grade in trolls school already. this is either grasping at straws ? or revealing NPO"s super secret master plan ? hmmmm which is it ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.