Jump to content

A clarification of MHA obligations.


Sorum

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 262
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

IMO, good move by MHA. The problem with treaties is that too many people were tied to each other and you end up with obligations on both sides of the fence...which doesn't work. Somebody's gotta lose out. Maybe if nothing else, this war will force all the major players to re-evaluate what it means to sign a treaty and we'll see less of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the treaty with NPO was a MDWWFLI ?

No, on the contrary. It a Mutual Defence Pact based on mutual interests with a mutual consensus on what is just and right. To wit, the MHA feels that as to the rationale of launching of this war - to use a cliche - was not mutual.

Cowardice is standing idly as wrongs are perpetuated in your name. Cowardice is being helplessness as innocents burn before you with their cries for mercy going unheard. We are the Mostly Harmless Alliance. We are not the Mostly Cowardice alliance.

Edited by Crushtania
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...