King Srqt Posted April 21, 2009 Author Report Share Posted April 21, 2009 (edited) Yeah, the first counter from them was essentially "how about we do nothing." Sounds good to me, right? The first counter was to have seth be removed and barred from gov. That was denied, then moo admitted that his allies knowingly accepted spied info to gather the CB. Things changed after that. Edited April 21, 2009 by KingSrqt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Byron Orpheus Posted April 21, 2009 Report Share Posted April 21, 2009 May I ask if you were present during the talks? No, which would explain why I haven't written my own thread on the subject. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthew Conrad Posted April 21, 2009 Report Share Posted April 21, 2009 No, which would explain why I haven't written my own thread on the subject. I believe you owe to to yourself to take accusations from both sides in stride. You cannot argue the validity of Kingsrgt's claims if you take NPO's word's at pure face value. Unless, of course, you were personally present. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Byron Orpheus Posted April 21, 2009 Report Share Posted April 21, 2009 (edited) I believe you owe to to yourself to take accusations from both sides in stride. You cannot argue the validity of Kingsrgt's claims if you take NPO's word's at pure face value. Unless, of course, you were personally present. I can give NPO more credibility because they are acting in defense of their alliance against espionage, whereas Kingsrgt is posting with an agenda in mind. Edited April 21, 2009 by Byron Orpheus Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Electron Sponge Posted April 21, 2009 Report Share Posted April 21, 2009 I can give NPO more credibility because they are acting in defense of their alliance against espionage, whereas Kingsrgt is posting with an agenda in mind. Everyone has an agenda and everything's conspiracy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ogaden Posted April 21, 2009 Report Share Posted April 21, 2009 Ahh good old moral equivalence, the dead horse than can never be beaten hard enough. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Srqt Posted April 21, 2009 Author Report Share Posted April 21, 2009 I can give NPO more credibility because they are acting in defense of their alliance against espionage, whereas Kingsrgt is posting with an agenda in mind. If by agenda you mean clear up gross misconceptions caused by misleading information being provided in the DoW of NPO then you got me red handed. If NPO was really trying to be forthcoming why did they present the logs form the 19th as if they were the end of talks when further talks happened on the 20th? (and moo posted logs form the 20th in this very thread so we know the talks happened) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.