choop Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 I hate this announcement. Not for the cancellation but for the terrible puns. You, sir, are an insult to humour everywhere. shhhh don't speak baby i know it hurts but it won't hurt forever maybe just this time also quinoa's a lady, and a hilarious one. ain't her fault nobody can resist the temptation to pun Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
William Blake Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 Good call. Also, good lord the puns. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boscher Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 Torn lost its mind Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Wilson Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 I forgot supporting the "other side" is a crime my bad. The reasons why I allied with TPF is because "your side" wanted me destroyed and they took me in. But they didn't make it public like you guys did, the fact they kept my alliance safe was good enough for them.And read my sig, you guys aren't really that "bad" yourselves. Like I said congragulations to TORN, ridding themselves of an alliance that just doesn't take treaties seriously. If you can change your foreign policies stance that quickly then I'd have to say you're not a sturdy alliance all together. First off, not my fault "my side" didn't like you or you pissed someone from "my side" off. And congrats on being TPF's meatshields...would you like a medal? Second off, I've read your sig. Honestly, your entitled to your own opinion of us, no matter how wrong it is. Thirdly, you spelled congratulations wrong. Fourth, What exactly do you know of the relationship between the two alliances? For all you know, they could have both agreed that relations were not the same as when they were when the treaty was signed. Maybe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Porkers. Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 I forgot supporting the "other side" is a crime my bad. The reasons why I allied with TPF is because "your side" wanted me destroyed and they took me in. But they didn't make it public like you guys did, the fact they kept my alliance safe was good enough for them.And read my sig, you guys aren't really that "bad" yourselves. Like I said congragulations to TORN, ridding themselves of an alliance that just doesn't take treaties seriously. If you can change your foreign policies stance that quickly then I'd have to say you're not a sturdy alliance all together. The TPF overseers and propoganda has really gone to your head. This next war is going to be just like GWIII rite? You're a true beacon to us all, ZIing mid level gov. members for leaving. 'Least that's what I heard anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The AUT Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 (edited) First off, not my fault "my side" didn't like you or you pissed someone from "my side" off. And congrats on being TPF's meatshields...would you like a medal?Second off, I've read your sig. Honestly, your entitled to your own opinion of us, no matter how wrong it is. Thirdly, you spelled congratulations wrong. Fourth, What exactly do you know of the relationship between the two alliances? For all you know, they could have both agreed that relations were not the same as when they were when the treaty was signed. Maybe. Meh it seems LoSS ruffled a few feathers, given the tone of the announcement, and I think LoSS just forgot to get rid of this treaty or felt it wasn't important enough. TORN cancelling it was expected, I don't think many knew that they both had a treaty but I think most knew if they did it'd be cancelled due to foreign affairs differences. Also English isn't my first language tyvm. The TPF overseers and propoganda has really gone to your head. This next war is going to be just like GWIII rite?You're a true beacon to us all, ZIing mid level gov. members for leaving. 'Least that's what I heard anyway. When it comes to protection and honor, TPF just does it better than you guys do. But this announcement isn't about them, you have an axe to grind bring it up with them not me. Edited April 19, 2009 by The AUT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emperor Brutus Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 Good move TORN, given the recent actions of LoSS they've proven to be rather unstable. Judging by the happenings of the past, you cannot say they are unstable, but rather your allies, so no need to call out on an alliance you know little about. Even their cancellations (which I must say I don't know to much of myself, but the reasons stated of moving closer to black). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OneBallMan Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 Much like those who've rushed to declare their neutrality even before the commencement of hostilities (allegedly), this is a huge gamble the LoSS has taken. Haven't we all, sitting there, quietly wondering if it is an air or a solid, and deciding to take the chance that it isn't a solid? Well, much like that, the running from your allies will be a gamble that LoSS will find to have been, alas, a shart. /TORN /Showers and a Fresh Pair of Undies for LoSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister Roboto Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 Brilliant political puns. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Xander the Only Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 Good call, TORN. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Porkers. Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 When it comes to protection and honor, TPF just does it better than you guys do. But this announcement isn't about them, you have an axe to grind bring it up with them not me. ..So it was them who ZIed your ex-mid level government members for leaving? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
astronaut jones Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 (edited) didn't they already drop this treaty? I thought LoSS dropped all of their treaties, or was I mistaken? Nope, they didn't drop it before. Oh well, LoSS is better off not being tied to TORN, anyway. Edited April 19, 2009 by astronaut jones Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caligula Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 This pleases the gods. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Wilson Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 Meh it seems LoSS ruffled a few feathers, given the tone of the announcement, and I think LoSS just forgot to get rid of this treaty or felt it wasn't important enough. TORN cancelling it was expected, I don't think many knew that they both had a treaty but I think most knew if they did it'd be cancelled due to foreign affairs differences.Also English isn't my first language tyvm. When it comes to protection and honor, TPF just does it better than you guys do. But this announcement isn't about them, you have an axe to grind bring it up with them not me. OOC: Firefox works wonders with Spell check Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emperor Brutus Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 didn't they already drop this treaty? I thought LoSS dropped all of their treaties, or was I mistaken? Nope, i'm pretty sure they wanted to give TORN a chance Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deth2munkies Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 This treaty was the only one puzzling me. It puzzles me no longer. Thank you for clarifying TORN. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Stupid Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 (edited) Congrats LoSS on getting rid of the rest of the trash Edited April 19, 2009 by Joe Stupid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RandomInterrupt Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 TORN has dropped the "A Righteous LoSS of Judgement Treaty" in response to their recent dishonorable actions. We are TORN up over this huge LOSS and sad to see it go into the TRASH CAN. Notice was given in private and the expiration period has now ended. Kisses, /s/ TORN gov I see what you did there. That said I think it's clear to almost everyone which alliance deserves to have its embassy re-purposed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canik Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 Oh Snapple! o/ TORN A righteous response, TORN. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emperor Brutus Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 Oh Snapple!o/ TORN A righteous response, TORN. I agree o/ TORN, your great wisdom astounds me... Rex, is it time yet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shahenshah Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 Good move TORN! In before LoSS demanded more information as a 'trusted ally' I guess this was their 'Insurance plan', in-case switching sides go bad for them . Good Luck Nemesis, LoSS's BFF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zoomzoomzoom Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 LoSS made a decision TORN made a decision. Good luck to both. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bower3aj Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 Much like those who've rushed to declare their neutrality even before the commencement of hostilities (allegedly), this is a huge gamble the LoSS has taken. Haven't we all, sitting there, quietly wondering if it is an air or a solid, and deciding to take the chance that it isn't a solid? Well, much like that, the running from your allies will be a gamble that LoSS will find to have been, alas, a shart. /TORN /Showers and a Fresh Pair of Undies for LoSS ummm... TORN cancelled this treaty... LoSS did not. So how this would be LoSS taking a huge gamble is beyond me. Or did you not look to see who was actually doing the canceling? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uaciaut Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 You're too new for making trash can refferences, i think bigwoody's more entitled to that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duncan King Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 (edited) Totally understandable TORN, and I do have to give you props for actually having the political skill, common decency and tact to notify a party BEFORE announcing that you're canceling on them. Nobody wants to look up at the Jumbotron and see that they've been dumped. Edit: Added analogy. Edited April 19, 2009 by Duncan King Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts