Sylar Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 The Legion Should be Italy, and do top 20 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ninja Colt Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 The Legion Should be Italy, and do top 20 Legion will always be France, you should know better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cptblck Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 its simple really NPO=US Gramlins=all of canada excluding quebec TOP=Quebec GGA=France IRON=russia OG=mexico ODN=Japan TGE=germany (am i going out on a limb here) TORN=italy INT=china i'll update this in a bit Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gurney Halleck Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 (edited) Gramlins=all of canada excluding quebecTOP=Quebec hahaha...I laughed. Nicely done. Edited April 19, 2009 by AAlumni Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sandwich Controversy Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 Mushroom Kingdom has a historic and irrefutable claim on the fertile lands of Madagascar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lyria Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 Mushroom Kingdom has a historic and irrefutable claim on the fertile lands of Madagascar also my RL father is from madagascar. i would find it most fitting if the location of our alliance on this map was the gorgeous forests and coasts of Madagascar. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonathan Archer Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 RoK and Valhalla should be in Scandinavia or Greenland Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brotherington Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 (edited) I think I speak for all of britain when i say please dont put GGA on the UK. Put them as N. Korea. MK wants madagascar. Edited April 19, 2009 by Brotherington Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diogenes Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 When MK's forefathers arrived upon the shores of Madagascar, they knew that they had found something special. Please don't take it away from us. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gobb Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 In West Madagascar born and raised... The beautiful island belongs to MK Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bleh32 Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 Put CSN on the Mongolian steppe. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Brendan Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 Put CSN on the Mongolian steppe. Shouldn't we be in the Soviet Union? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SilverHawk Posted April 20, 2009 Report Share Posted April 20, 2009 I think I speak for all of britain when i say please dont put GGA on the UK. Put them as N. Korea.MK wants madagascar. S. Korea you mean. Seeing as how we have actual functioning nuclear weapons. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shodemofi-NPO Posted April 20, 2009 Report Share Posted April 20, 2009 S. Korea you mean. Seeing as how we have actual functioning nuclear weapons. The amount of facepalm in that post is...awe-inspiring. South Korea doesn't have nukes. North Korea does. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deth2munkies Posted April 20, 2009 Report Share Posted April 20, 2009 Don't you dare bring your CNRP wizardry into my AP. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vyper Posted April 20, 2009 Report Share Posted April 20, 2009 Shouldn't we be in the Soviet Union? Hmm... CSN should be Australia... or Hungary... Canada... Budapest... more to come... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ada069 Posted April 20, 2009 Report Share Posted April 20, 2009 i think it would be best if u INVENT your own map. and then use that. it makes it better then using our current world map Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vyper Posted April 20, 2009 Report Share Posted April 20, 2009 i guess Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JayOvfEnnay Posted April 20, 2009 Report Share Posted April 20, 2009 i think it would be best if u INVENT your own map. and then use that.it makes it better then using our current world map Although that would be very complicated to do, it would be much more interesting. I might make an attempt at this today or tomorrow, however I'd like the OP to continue in his work as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ada069 Posted April 20, 2009 Report Share Posted April 20, 2009 not really hard, Fake maps are easy to make. Good ones are the problem tho Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Innerspeaker Posted April 21, 2009 Report Share Posted April 21, 2009 Although that would be very complicated to do, it would be much more interesting. I might make an attempt at this today or tomorrow, however I'd like the OP to continue in his work as well. I have one in the works right now, and I intend to make it very different from the maps of the past. Here's a teaser: I'm including old alliance boundaries (like I did in the Hypothetical World Map thread a while back) of the more important alliances of yesteryear. - They will be transparent, and some will be unoccupied (unless it makes sense for an alliance to occupy the space. Ex; NAAC = GR partly, LUE = MK partly, Umbrella = Gen[m]ay partly. - Placement of larger alliances will be unconventional; IRON will not be in Australia. MCXA might take it's place (for reasons which I will explain in my thread when I post it.) - I'm doing my best to place blocs of alliances near each other for the most part. Some exceptions have been made though (ex. NV is not exactly located near NpO, GR, MK, or STA, due to conflicting themes) - I'm taking into account both membership counts and NS, as well as simple space on the map. Ex. TOP should dominate Scandinavia and practically everything around it. It can't, however, because of the massive amount of alliances that need to go in Europe. Therefore, TOP only occupies Scandinavia, however it's influence covers most of the region (see the next bullet) - To show influence, each alliance has a glow applied to it, and depending on how influential the alliance is, it's glow will reach farther. A good ex is TOP, who has a relatively small territory, but who's glow reaches out quite far, and actually overlaps with that of FOK's, who also faces the same dilemma (so much NS/membership, so little room on the map) and is therefore placed in the Netherlands and Germany, but should actually cover a larger area. - Each alliance will be based MOSTLY around membership size on the map, however their NS will be seen through the opacity of their boundaries. For example, NPO will have a very large boundary due to the large number of nations, and it will also be largely opaque. The opposite is clear with an alliance like TDO, who's membership is very large, but who's color on the map will be semi-transparent relative to NPO's. TPF would have a smaller boundary, but a less transparent color. I hope this makes sense. I think you'll like the map when I'm done with it. I'm going to preview it to Polaris when I finish it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keresztes Posted April 21, 2009 Report Share Posted April 21, 2009 I have one in the works right now, and I intend to make it very different from the maps of the past.<snip> That sounds absolutely brilliant. I can't wait to see this map of yours. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sovyet Gelibolu Posted April 21, 2009 Report Share Posted April 21, 2009 INT=china We're too small for China. According to Sumeragi, we get 700K sq km and that's it. Thanks for thinking of us though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sumeragi Posted April 22, 2009 Author Report Share Posted April 22, 2009 I'll look into this tomorrow. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comrade Tiki Posted April 22, 2009 Report Share Posted April 22, 2009 People are talking about making a fictional map. I have a reference geographical map. It is divided into roughly-equal named territories and the sea is divided into zones, but any of those things may be altered or removed. The design was initially geared for Axis & Allies play. Here's a preview, the original is actually 16 times wider and taller... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.