Sovyet Gelibolu Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 I'll join the group of oldies saying that the Great War series was the series of wars between NPO and LUE (and their brown colony). By this logic, wars involving GR and MK on one side should be called Great War 2.0 [roman numeral]. The WoC was thus GW2 I Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hammer Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 "The Great Reckoning" sounds great for the next war, if it lives up to hype I wish that it was like the days before my time though - The Citrus War and Polar Wars 1 & 2 sound so much more characterful Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
njndirish Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 continuing on from what I was saying, a Great War is considered a Great War by a majority of the community after the fact. Sure pockets refer to UJW as GWIV and WoC as GWV, but the large majority refer to them by their voted on name. If a war does match the scale of I-III then it will probably become GWIV, but I believe that is very unlikely. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaGneT Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 Great Wars 1-3 were the only Great Wars. NPO vs CoaLUEtionThe next ones were the "Curb Stomp Wars", mainly because they were very one sided in terms of NS. Hopefully this next war will start a new era of them. UJW wasn't really one-sided. It was close enough. continuing on from what I was saying, a Great War is considered a Great War by a majority of the community after the fact. Sure pockets refer to UJW as GWIV and WoC as GWV, but the large majority refer to them by their voted on name. If a war does match the scale of I-III then it will probably become GWIV, but I believe that is very unlikely. I consider UJW a "great war" but not a "Great War", if you follow. Definitely a World War. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
njndirish Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 UJW wasn't really one-sided.It was close enough. I consider UJW a "great war" but not a "Great War", if you follow. Definitely a World War. First point, UJP was outnumbered a minimal 2:1 in NS and nations. Even if they had perfect coordination, there is nothing that could have delivered a more sounding blow than all the bandwaggoners that hopped on. Second point, yes its a world war, but it lasted just over a week and no damage was done to one side with the exception of the NpO. (~ actually grew 1,000,000 NS by the end of the war) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bleh32 Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 Though it doesn't pertain to the topic, I thought an interesting history note was that GATO was NPO's first ally in the game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gfloyd2002 Posted April 20, 2009 Report Share Posted April 20, 2009 Can't we just stop calling the wars "Great War [insert number here]" and use some creativity? Not only would we have the fun of a more descriptive name, we could avoid endless arguments about whether it is or isn't a "Great" war. Putting my creativity where my mouth is, my vote for the name of coming war is "The Continuum Civil War." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Groucho Marx Posted April 20, 2009 Report Share Posted April 20, 2009 There's only Three Great wars; Between the Orders and the CoaLUEtion. Just as a lot of people have said before me. 3 is also a cool number to stop on. Tell that to George Lucas. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Hanson Posted April 21, 2009 Report Share Posted April 21, 2009 not having been present for the GW's (however many you all decide on) my comments are rather limited. however, it would seem that unless there is a change the wars involving a good majority of alliances in CN will probably continue to be tagged with the "great war." (OOC) as a newcomer the use of GW seems to parallel the use of WW outside CN personally I think it would be good to let the GW's have their titles and move onto something new to show the distinction between then and now... and with something continuum related since that seems to be a big element in the recent shakeup leading to NPO and TORN declaring war on OV Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.