Markus Wilding Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 We vote yes on the HCCP. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilantWatcher Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 Colstream votes Yes on the HCCP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lynneth Posted April 19, 2009 Author Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 Amendment: Article 10-Supremacy ClauseThe ComIntern takes precedence over any other treaty, regardless of why and when the other treaty was made. Yes - 5 Vote(s) No - 1 Vote(s) To vote: Yuktobania, Cainette New United Soviet Republic Yes - 3 vote(s) No - 0 votes(s) To vote: Beijing Corp., Bosporan, Yuktobania, Cainette, Xizang Although we do not wish to clutter the votes, something entirely else: A renowned canadian architect has proposed the following as the HQ of the ComIntern - Is this acceptable, or do you wish to propose something else? (OOC: Clickable) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
comrade nikonov Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 OOC: Lenin, fools Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JEDCJT Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 Although we do not wish to clutter the votes, something entirely else: A renowned canadian architect has proposed the following as the HQ of the ComIntern - Is this acceptable, or do you wish to propose something else? (OOC: Clickable) It has our emphatic vote of Yes! OOC: Wow...it looks quite...neat! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
comrade nikonov Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 OOC: JED vote for me :3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cody Seb Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 "We are more than impressed with the Candian concept for ComIntern Headquarters. As for the HCCP, We cannot say at this time. Their conduct during the war in Europe was questionable at best and their spats with the Beijing Corporation leave a bad taste in our mouth. If the HCCP could make an argument explaining their actions, we could perhaps have a clearer picture on how we'd like to vote." -Chairman Jintao Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Markus Wilding Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 "The Canadian concept surpasses anything they have built before." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stefano Palmieri Posted April 20, 2009 Report Share Posted April 20, 2009 Amendment: Yes - 5 Vote(s) No - 1 Vote(s) To vote: Yuktobania, Cainette New United Soviet Republic Yes - 3 vote(s) No - 0 votes(s) To vote: Beijing Corp., Bosporan, Yuktobania, Cainette, Xizang Although we do not wish to clutter the votes, something entirely else: A renowned canadian architect has proposed the following as the HQ of the ComIntern - Is this acceptable, or do you wish to propose something else? (OOC: Clickable) On the Amendment: Aye On the NUSR: Aye And the Canadian building would make a glorious headquaters. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lynneth Posted April 20, 2009 Author Report Share Posted April 20, 2009 (edited) Amendment: Article 10-Supremacy ClauseThe ComIntern takes precedence over any other treaty, regardless of why and when the other treaty was made. Yes - 6 Vote(s) No - 1 Vote(s) To vote: Yuktobania Thus the amendment would be passed, as it was proposed before New England was part of the ComIntern. We will proceed adding it to the treaty. New United Soviet Republic Yes - 4 vote(s) No - 0 votes(s) Undecided - 1 vote(s) To vote: Beijing Corp., Bosporan, Yuktobania (Clickable) Yes - 5 vote(s) No - 0 votes(s) To vote: Beijing Corp., Bosporan, Yuktobania, Colstream Edited April 20, 2009 by Lynneth Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Keshav IV Posted April 20, 2009 Report Share Posted April 20, 2009 (edited) We vote no on HCCP entering again. We don't see them change. I am sorry, we don't like them at all. We vote yes on the CominTerm headquarters. Edited April 20, 2009 by Sir Keshav IV Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilantWatcher Posted April 20, 2009 Report Share Posted April 20, 2009 We vote yes on the proposed headquarters of the ComIntern Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cody Seb Posted April 20, 2009 Report Share Posted April 20, 2009 Xizang moves its vote to No for the HCCP. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
comrade nikonov Posted April 20, 2009 Report Share Posted April 20, 2009 "We are more than impressed with the Candian concept for ComIntern Headquarters. As for the HCCP, We cannot say at this time. Their conduct during the war in Europe was questionable at best and their spats with the Beijing Corporation leave a bad taste in our mouth. If the HCCP could make an argument explaining their actions, we could perhaps have a clearer picture on how we'd like to vote."-Chairman Jintao #1. The Conference in Lenagrad was classified. #2. Our conduct in the European War was aimed at creating a stable government in Xenix while creating another front againt Molakia in support of an ally, Slavorussia. Need more explanation? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cody Seb Posted April 20, 2009 Report Share Posted April 20, 2009 #1. The Conference in Lenagrad was classified. #2. Our conduct in the European War was aimed at creating a stable government in Xenix while creating another front againt Molakia in support of an ally, Slavorussia. Need more explanation? "#1: Your conference may have been classified, but your preceding arguments weren't. #2: It's the principle. We don't want ComIntern dragged into a war for bad reasons. Now that the 'explanation has come forth, we stand by our no." -Chairman Jintao Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
comrade nikonov Posted April 20, 2009 Report Share Posted April 20, 2009 "#1: Your conference may have been classified, but your preceding arguments weren't.#2: It's the principle. We don't want ComIntern dragged into a war for bad reasons. Now that the 'explanation has come forth, we stand by our no." -Chairman Jintao Keep in mind that Comintern was at war with Molakia and the rest of the Nordic Confederacy at that time as well, and we will also remind you that Comintern is not responsible for any consequences of any possible offensive actions by the HCCP, although we do not wish to commit such a terrible act again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Imperator Azenquor Posted April 20, 2009 Report Share Posted April 20, 2009 The Vaulian Socialist Republic (Socializte Republika Vauleya) hereby requests admission to the ComIntern. We admit that we are at a transitional phase, but we feel that the situation shall soon be resolved and normality resume. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Razgriz 2K9 Posted April 20, 2009 Report Share Posted April 20, 2009 Republic of New EnglandYes - 6 vote(s) No - 0 votes(s) To vote: Yuktobania, Cainette New England is, de facto in the ComIntern, as 6 of 8 votes are 3/4, more than what would be needed. Observers have determined that their policies are fine. We ask for the signature of the R.N.E. Amendment: Yes - 5 Vote(s) No - 1 Vote(s) To vote: Yuktobania, Cainette While we still are somewhat weary of the HCCP, Canada will give them a chance. They were new back when they tried to temporarily occupy Xenix (OOC: Or what was it called?) before the international community recognised that country as fallen into anarchy. They were somewhat quick in entering the NC-Russian war, but we hope that they've learned patience. New United Soviet Republic Yes - 1 vote(s) No - 0 votes(s) To vote: Beijing Corp., Bosporan, Yuktobania, Cainette, Alvonia, Colstream, Xizang New England: Yes New Amendment: Yes NUSR: Yes (Anything with Soviet = a Yes to me) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lynneth Posted April 20, 2009 Author Report Share Posted April 20, 2009 (edited) Amendment: Article 10-Supremacy ClauseThe ComIntern takes precedence over any other treaty, regardless of why and when the other treaty was made. Yes - 7 Vote(s) No - 1 Vote(s) To vote: None The amendment is passed with overwhelming majority. New United Soviet Republic Yes - 5 vote(s) No - 2 votes(s) Undecided - 0 vote(s) To vote: Astrakhan (Clickable) Yes - 7 vote(s) No - 0 votes(s) To vote: Astrakhan, Yuktobania Vaulian Socialist Republic Yes - 1 vote(s) No - 0 votes(s) Undecided - 0 vote(s) To vote: Beijing Corp., Astrakhan, Yuktobania, Cainette, Alvonia, Colstream, Xizang, New England Edited April 20, 2009 by Lynneth Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Markus Wilding Posted April 20, 2009 Report Share Posted April 20, 2009 Sadly we have to vote no. Their instability is their deathkneel for us. -Alvonian Communist Congress Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JEDCJT Posted April 20, 2009 Report Share Posted April 20, 2009 New England votes yes for the admission of the Vaulian Socialist Republic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stefano Palmieri Posted April 21, 2009 Report Share Posted April 21, 2009 Cainette votes yes on the Entry of the VSR Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Keshav IV Posted April 21, 2009 Report Share Posted April 21, 2009 VSR has our yes. If HCCP enters we shall have second thoughts about CominTern. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agostinho Neto Posted April 21, 2009 Report Share Posted April 21, 2009 The Azerbaijani Republic wishes to join the Comintern, we will be sending a diplomat to open negotiations for a membership. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maelstrom Vortex Posted April 21, 2009 Report Share Posted April 21, 2009 (edited) The Chairman arrives.. after a time. He dismisses Tom Clark. "I am here to re-apply on the behalf of Dragonisia.. anyone with policy questions about the measure of our socialism needs only inquire with me. Hopefully those who were misinformed of the state of our nation have read up on our global fact book and double checked their state intelligence reports to verify their understanding of our government apparatus." He takes a seat. He fills out the form and slides it to the representative from Canada as would be appropriate. "Greetings from the recently renamed People's Francoist Socialist Meritocracy of Dragonisia." ooc: The results would be the same as the last tests no doubt Lynneth, if you wish to skip that step, if not send me a message and I'll respond with whatever new information you need." Edited April 21, 2009 by Maelstrom Vortex Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.