Leftbehind Posted March 30, 2009 Report Share Posted March 30, 2009 I'm down with this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mykep Posted March 30, 2009 Report Share Posted March 30, 2009 (edited) Signed. De Pantsless Gecko Edited April 1, 2009 by mykep Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Denial Posted March 30, 2009 Report Share Posted March 30, 2009 (edited) While TPF has been historically anti-E-ZI/P-ZI, I can't see us signing this document. Why would we sign something that has been our long-standing policy? Even if we ignore the fact that this agreement is for individual signatures, rather than alliance signatures, it still translates as "You know what, I'm going to be difficult just for the sake of being difficult." Because he feels that it's redundant would be my guess. That's why TOOL didn't sign ZIPP, for example. As much as I like TOOL, this may be the silliest statement I've read today. Edit: Typo. Edited March 30, 2009 by Revanche Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sal Paradise Posted March 30, 2009 Report Share Posted March 30, 2009 Because he feels that it's redundant would be my guess. That's why TOOL didn't sign ZIPP, for example. However, I don't think Slayer's saying TPF members can't sign this, just that they as an alliance won't sign it. Redundant treaties? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RustyNail Posted March 30, 2009 Report Share Posted March 30, 2009 (edited) /s signed and stuff i'm good for it Edited April 1, 2009 by RustyNail Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Systemfailure Posted March 30, 2009 Report Share Posted March 30, 2009 ~signed Systemfailure, Lord of Low NS Nukes and Offical LoBTiOPNaA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firestorm Posted March 30, 2009 Report Share Posted March 30, 2009 signed, firestorm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LJ Scott Posted March 30, 2009 Report Share Posted March 30, 2009 I'm down for keeping Vox Populi on EZI Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heero Posted March 31, 2009 Report Share Posted March 31, 2009 *Sign* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FallenFighter Posted March 31, 2009 Report Share Posted March 31, 2009 (edited) Signed, FallenFighter Edited April 1, 2009 by FallenFighter Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Swampy Posted March 31, 2009 Report Share Posted March 31, 2009 If Slayer doesn't want to sign, then he doesn't want to sign. Let him do what he wants, sheesh. It's not a big deal. This is a curious document to me. I like the sentiment but I don't believe in the idea of what it's against. It seems to protest the practice of perma-ZI/eternal ZI (if there's a difference, I'm assuming, it is that PZI ends at national deletion while EZI doesn't, and in that case this is more focused on EZI), but I'm not convinced that either exist. I think there's such a thing as long-term ZI, but nothing in CN is forever. Everything changes, ZI statuses certainly included. It's just a matter of patience. That having been said, the document's stipulations for adherence don't actually list anything I have an issue with, save for the third point's lack of qualification for spies/multis/justified cases of that nature whereby continued !@#$%baggery must be addressed. But as I believe such qualifications are well within the expressed spirit of the document and its creation I will sign it conditionally with my explicitly aforementioned qualification. /s/ Lord Swampy, of the Purple Sphere Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stravolice Posted March 31, 2009 Report Share Posted March 31, 2009 I would like my signature on that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tyrant Lizard King Posted March 31, 2009 Report Share Posted March 31, 2009 *ends months worth of lurking to sign a cool treaty* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xiao Weng Posted April 1, 2009 Report Share Posted April 1, 2009 I'm too lazy to put forth the effort to ZI someone again after the first time. I'll sign it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shahman Posted April 1, 2009 Report Share Posted April 1, 2009 (edited) signed by shahman, Ruler of Mesopotamia EDIT: due to PZI now being a uncommon practice, i remove. Edited May 10, 2009 by shahman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sage Masters Posted April 1, 2009 Report Share Posted April 1, 2009 Sage Masters steps up to the table You have my signature. Sage Masters bows and leaves the room Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicholas III Posted April 1, 2009 Report Share Posted April 1, 2009 for what it's worth /s/ Nicholas III Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Merrie Melodies Posted April 1, 2009 Report Share Posted April 1, 2009 Please add my name Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.