Ventus ex Gutter Posted March 23, 2009 Report Share Posted March 23, 2009 I object, despite my eager desire to kill. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cookavich Posted March 24, 2009 Report Share Posted March 24, 2009 I object to this most heinous of practices. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MercyFallout Posted March 24, 2009 Report Share Posted March 24, 2009 I object to the practice of EZI. -Hizzy What this good man said. -MercyFallout Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azaghul Posted March 24, 2009 Report Share Posted March 24, 2009 Though I oppose EZI it's very highly unlikely that MK will ever eternal-ZI anyone, I can't pledge to sign something that commits to potentially going against my alliance. Sorry. I support the cause though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hyperion321 Posted March 24, 2009 Report Share Posted March 24, 2009 (edited) I object to E-ZI, but I will not disobey an order. So, As much as I support the document, I can't formally sign it. Edited March 24, 2009 by Hyperion321 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cowen70 Posted March 24, 2009 Report Share Posted March 24, 2009 I object Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starcraftmazter Posted March 25, 2009 Report Share Posted March 25, 2009 Is there not already a thing which is almost identical to this. http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=52123 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jerdge Posted March 25, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 25, 2009 Is there not already a thing which is almost identical to this.http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=52123 Do you mean the one that was posted around 2 hours and 45 minutes after this one? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Augustus Autumn Posted March 25, 2009 Report Share Posted March 25, 2009 Article I of the constitution of The Sasori Initiative forbids this practice already. As such, I support this document as a non-signatory. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alcoholic Posted March 25, 2009 Report Share Posted March 25, 2009 I object Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Audran Posted March 25, 2009 Report Share Posted March 25, 2009 Objection Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dochartaigh Posted March 25, 2009 Report Share Posted March 25, 2009 I object. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Revan Posted March 25, 2009 Report Share Posted March 25, 2009 I am bad at reading time stamps. Thread re-opened. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Wilson Posted March 26, 2009 Report Share Posted March 26, 2009 I object! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starcraftmazter Posted March 26, 2009 Report Share Posted March 26, 2009 Do you mean the one that was posted around 2 hours and 45 minutes after this one? Oops I object. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarriorConcept Posted March 26, 2009 Report Share Posted March 26, 2009 I am bad at reading time stamps. Thread re-opened. My force mind control ran out Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
im317 Posted March 26, 2009 Report Share Posted March 26, 2009 i do say i object to EZI. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mongrel Posted March 26, 2009 Report Share Posted March 26, 2009 As Ragnarok has already condemned EZI and I will never join an alliance that supports the policy I'll sign So Please note my objection Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Venizelos Posted March 31, 2009 Report Share Posted March 31, 2009 uh-oh. [ooc]OP has been to a few MUN conferences the operative clauses need restructuring and "believing" is a bad verb that i usually frown upon [/ooc] what's the difference between this and the earlier anti-PZI/EZI pact on these forums? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jerdge Posted March 31, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 31, 2009 uh-oh.[ooc]OP has been to a few MUN conferences the operative clauses need restructuring and "believing" is a bad verb that i usually frown upon [/ooc] what's the difference between this and the earlier anti-PZI/EZI pact on these forums? The ZIPP is for alliances, not nations. The "Pact in Faith, For the People, By the People" isn't "earlier": this came first (also, that is ooc and this is meant to be ic). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arrnea Posted March 31, 2009 Report Share Posted March 31, 2009 I object. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sanru Posted March 31, 2009 Report Share Posted March 31, 2009 I object. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asriel Belacqua Posted April 4, 2009 Report Share Posted April 4, 2009 At times I find it best to stand out, even when it might get you killed. As such, I, Asriel Belacqua, do hereby sign this pact and pledge to never condemn someone to EZI, and will even take it further and pledge to never condemn someone to PZI also. Consider my name placed upon this document. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iosif Posted April 5, 2009 Report Share Posted April 5, 2009 I object. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sorum Posted April 5, 2009 Report Share Posted April 5, 2009 I object. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.