FearUnited Posted March 7, 2009 Report Share Posted March 7, 2009 Accusing us of being a disgrace? Let us review the round that was for the UN.Surrendering a week into the round Hmmmm, well, I guess that is the only thing you guys did worth noting. Oh, well I guess there is this whole thing. A few people attempt a takeover and the only play you have is to try to merge the alliance! :lol: Now that is powerful leadership. Just admit you guys failed, and that we are the best thing that ever happened to this alliance. And heh, either way we win. We either get to lead the alliance into a new day, or we completely rid the planet of a bunch of failures. B) And Franz Ferdinand as I see you to have claimed the alliance, I must offer you my support. U R WRONG!!!! This is not ur victory yet, U WILL NOT MAKE THE UN A BIG DISGRACE, U R THE DISGRACE OF THIS ALLIANCE, U R GOING TO MAKE THIS ALLIANCE LOOK BAD, AND I WILL STOP U!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zikawe Posted March 7, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 7, 2009 I totally agree, they r trying to get ppl to think tht he is the new leader, but honestly, i know tht hes not and the new guys r trying to make the UN a bigger disgrace I am the leader. I took over the alliance in a legitimate way, through force. It seems to me the former leadership took over the alliance in the same way. I fail to see what made them legitimate and what makes us 'rebels.' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zikawe Posted March 7, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 7, 2009 U R WRONG!!!! This is not ur victory yet, U WILL NOT MAKE THE UN A BIG DISGRACE, U R THE DISGRACE OF THIS ALLIANCE, U R GOING TO MAKE THIS ALLIANCE LOOK BAD, AND I WILL STOP U!!!! Like I could possibly make it look worse then the former government already had. Judging by all the posts of support in this thread I would say you have the minority opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gilbert Torres Posted March 7, 2009 Report Share Posted March 7, 2009 I am the leader. I took over the alliance in a legitimate way, through force. It seems to me the former leadership took over the alliance in the same way. I fail to see what made them legitimate and what makes us 'rebels.' Because Shadow Matrix, did it for a good reason. He wanted to better the alliance. Force was never the way to take the UN, if you wanted to do something it should have been done in a diplomatic manner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FearUnited Posted March 7, 2009 Report Share Posted March 7, 2009 Like I could possibly make it look worse then the former government already had. Judging by all the posts of support in this thread I would say you have the minority opinion. ACTUALLY, i can bring u DOWN, U R A DISGRACE TO THE UN, I WILL STOP U WITH MANY PEOPLE, U THINK U MAY BE STRONG NOW TRAITOR< BUT U WILL BE WEAK, REALLY SOON Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FearUnited Posted March 7, 2009 Report Share Posted March 7, 2009 (edited) U r recking and tearing the alliance apart, U R THE GHOST AND DISGRACE OF THE UN, especially attacking its GENERAL Edited March 7, 2009 by FearUnited Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zikawe Posted March 7, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 7, 2009 Because Shadow Matrix, did it for a good reason. He wanted to better the alliance. Force was never the way to take the UN, if you wanted to do something it should have been done in a diplomatic manner. I am what is best for the alliance. Based on the leadership Shadow Matrix showed it is evident to me that that this is the only way to advance this alliance. Trying to help the alliance through a structure that has clearly failed time and time again would be pointless, and a waste of my time. The fact that I was able to take over this easily and your only recourse was to merge just shows how weak that structure was. Plus, diplomacy is for Beazy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Believland Posted March 7, 2009 Report Share Posted March 7, 2009 Because Shadow Matrix, did it for a good reason. He wanted to better the alliance. Force was never the way to take the UN, if you wanted to do something it should have been done in a diplomatic manner. Heh, CG is making the alliance better. Your ex alliance has better PR than when you were in gov't ACTUALLY, i can bring u DOWN, U R A DISGRACE TO THE UN, I WILL STOP U WITH MANY PEOPLE, U THINK U MAY BE STRONG NOW TRAITOR< BUT U WILL BE WEAK, REALLY SOON How do you plan to take CG down? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FearUnited Posted March 7, 2009 Report Share Posted March 7, 2009 I am what is best for the alliance. Based on the leadership Shadow Matrix showed it is evident to me that that this is the only way to advance this alliance. Trying to help the alliance through a structure that has clearly failed time and time again would be pointless, and a waste of my time. The fact that I was able to take over this easily and your only recourse was to merge just shows how weak that structure was. Plus, diplomacy is for Beazy. Time is the key, rushing to to defeat, wat u r going to do is make this alliance gone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Believland Posted March 7, 2009 Report Share Posted March 7, 2009 When you decided to merge, that's what was going to make UN gone. Now that CG is in gov't you guys have a light at the end of the tunnel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zikawe Posted March 7, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 7, 2009 (edited) Time is the key, rushing to to defeat, wat u r going to do is make this alliance gone It is not I who is doing that, it is the former failed government that is doing all they can to guarantee this alliance disappears. If you want this alliance to survive you need to get behind me. Edited March 7, 2009 by Zikawe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gilbert Torres Posted March 7, 2009 Report Share Posted March 7, 2009 I am what is best for the alliance. Based on the leadership Shadow Matrix showed it is evident to me that that this is the only way to advance this alliance. Trying to help the alliance through a structure that has clearly failed time and time again would be pointless, and a waste of my time. The fact that I was able to take over this easily and your only recourse was to merge just shows how weak that structure was. Plus, diplomacy is for Beazy. CG I suggest you change the alliance name to "New United Nations" because you are clearly trying to run a new one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FearUnited Posted March 7, 2009 Report Share Posted March 7, 2009 Gilbert Torres and Shadow Matrix r great leaders for the UN, dont mistaken their power Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Franz Ferdinand Posted March 7, 2009 Report Share Posted March 7, 2009 Gilbert Torres and Shadow Matrix r great leaders for the UN, dont mistaken their power Please step away from the keyboard and play World of Warcraft! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FearUnited Posted March 7, 2009 Report Share Posted March 7, 2009 U just should make ur own new alliance then, but dont reck this one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zikawe Posted March 7, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 7, 2009 Gilbert Torres and Shadow Matrix r great leaders for the UN, dont mistaken their power lololol I get the same feeling! Great leaders for sure! Oh wait... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Franz Ferdinand Posted March 7, 2009 Report Share Posted March 7, 2009 U just should make ur own new alliance then, but dont reck this one There is nothing to wreck, so please get your facts right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gilbert Torres Posted March 7, 2009 Report Share Posted March 7, 2009 Run the "New United Nations" You are running a whole new game, so you should show that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Believland Posted March 7, 2009 Report Share Posted March 7, 2009 U just should make ur own new alliance then, but dont reck this one What don't you get? UN is going to die with out CG Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Franz Ferdinand Posted March 7, 2009 Report Share Posted March 7, 2009 Run the "New United Nations"You are running a whole new game, so you should show that. Yes, yet except for "New United Nations", it should be "Kamikaze". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zikawe Posted March 7, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 7, 2009 What don't you get? UN is going to die with out CG Exactly. The former leaders are trying to kill the alliance off, I am here to save it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gilbert Torres Posted March 7, 2009 Report Share Posted March 7, 2009 Yes, yet except for "New United Nations", it should be "Kamikaze". Exactly, doesn't matter. But make your case known, you are taking the UN by force. and you need to show people that you are not the original UN. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Franz Ferdinand Posted March 7, 2009 Report Share Posted March 7, 2009 Exactly, doesn't matter. But make your case known, you are taking the UN by force. and you need to show people that you are not the original UN. I'm bored, you are now on the Kamikaze PZI list, because I have nothing better to do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gilbert Torres Posted March 7, 2009 Report Share Posted March 7, 2009 I'm bored, you are now on the Kamikaze PZI list, because I have nothing better to do. What is PZI? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zikawe Posted March 7, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 7, 2009 What is PZI? Permanent Zero Infrastructure. :jihad: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts