HeinousOne Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 And this means a NAP really did come into play!You're Welcome. Ahh, I see. So you are saying that my two little lines have bear some greater motive then to simply say that this will be a morale builder for the alliance due to the boredom that has overtaken the world as a whole? Or perhaps its the fact that I told my former comrades to enjoy their new ribbons after this war? My most sincere apologies for making such a flamable post. Thank you for showing me the light. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
General Specific Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 Yes it is the offending party taking the game to personal and criminal levels. Not only that Jarheads intended to use OOC methods for IC gain. Players committing such acts forfeit all the right they have to play this game. You are so clouded by your hatred of Pacifica that you can't apply any form of logical reasoning. You know for a fact if it was your alliance who posted this DOW you would be in here hailing it. I support the NPO's war and IC CB here, but... OOC: your post is flat-out disturbing. You cannot brand an entire alliance as OOC criminals based on the actions of an alleged few, and then declare that all of them have no right to play the game. Unless you are Holy Admin in disguise here, in which case, do your thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salmacis Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 Yeah, I'm not sure what you're rambling about, but you have fun with that then. Nintenderek etc... Why did you tell him? Vox is ruining my fun, they have to be stopped. Pssh. Take that: o/ Pacifica Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silentkiller Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 (edited) I'd much prefer that in game wars, especially ones likely to destroy alliances and keep players from enjoying this game, be started for IC actions. You want a war based on IC actions? Well the bit where they were planning to eliminate us is IC and no dont tell me that just because they are 91k they should be treated any differently. Edited March 1, 2009 by silentkiller Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin McDonald Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 "Remember the 90k destroyers of Pacifica"Lol, Last Laughs. If it came to light that the leadership of a much smaller alliance than Zenith was plotting Zenith's destruction, what would you do? I am sincerely curious about it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord of Destruction Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 "Remember the 90k destroyers of Pacifica"Lol, Last Laughs. I see that you continue to say the same exact thing over and over again. It really isn't funny, or clever. The size of their alliance does not matter. They planned to attack us, we found out about it, and we attacked them first. Letting an enemy grow stronger when you know that they plan to attack you is stupid. We chose to destroy them now, rather than later. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jtkode Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 And I though this would be an interesting night :/ I'll just keep waiting. O/ NPO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sarai Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 I've found that the MIA song "Paper Planes" from the Slumdog soundtrack is great for wars. Anyway, good luck Alpha and Beta, aid is awaiting from your comrades as needed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beauty Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 If it came to light that the leadership of a much smaller alliance than Zenith was plotting Zenith's destruction, what would you do?I am sincerely curious about it. We'd be like "lol" and go talk to them, No one can hate Zenith. I see that you continue to say the same exact thing over and over again. It really isn't funny, or clever.The size of their alliance does not matter. They planned to attack us, we found out about it, and we attacked them first. Letting an enemy grow stronger when you know that they plan to attack you is stupid. We chose to destroy them now, rather than later. No, It isnt meant to be funny nor' cleaver. But instead of Diplomacy or Talking IRCly, You use missles. You got 900 members, Get some diplomats. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ragashingo Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 You want a war based on IC actions? Well the bit where they were planning to eliminate us is IC and no dont tell me that just because they are 91k they should be treated any differently. Nah, the size doesn't matter. I've always been a proponent of not punishing an entire alliance for the actions of a few. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MCRABT Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 I support the NPO's war and IC CB here, but...OOC: your post is flat-out disturbing. You cannot brand an entire alliance as OOC criminals based on the actions of an alleged few, and then declare that all of them have no right to play the game. Unless you are Holy Admin in disguise here, in which case, do your thing. Oh common you are just knit picking for the sake of it. Government represent the alliance always, if you pick the wrong alliance and involve yourself with the type of people that are likely to get your nation killed then you have simply played the game wrong and will suffer the consequences. The players ignorance is irrelevant I doubt anyone would choose to play badly otherwise there would be no point playing at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin McDonald Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 We'd be like "lol" and go talk to them, No one can hate Zenith. Thanks for the non answer. It made ignoring you easier. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silentkiller Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 (edited) I'd much prefer that in game wars, especially ones likely to destroy alliances and keep players from enjoying this game, be started for IC actions. Wrong. We'd be like "lol" and go talk to them, No one can hate Zenith.No, It isnt meant to be funny nor' cleaver. But instead of Diplomacy or Talking IRCly, You use missles. You got 900 members, Get some diplomats. Ok there is obviously no point in arguing with you, you are just going to come up with lol 90k vs 21mil lololol. We are evil and we like killing alliances. happy? Edited March 1, 2009 by silentkiller Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeinousOne Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 We'd be like "lol" and go talk to them, No one can hate Zenith.No, It isnt meant to be funny nor' cleaver. But instead of Diplomacy or Talking IRCly, You use missles. You got 900 members, Get some diplomats. Come on now, if anyone has plenty of diplomats its the NPO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corinan Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 No, It isnt meant to be funny nor' cleaver. But instead of Diplomacy or Talking IRCly, You use missles. You got 900 members, Get some diplomats. You don't get Technology by using diplomacy though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vaynard Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 Is declaring war on a small alliance that plans a futile attempt to destroy the NPO justified? Is killing a mosquito that tries to suck the blood of a man justified? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeinousOne Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 You don't get Technology by using diplomacy though. So there was indeed a lesson learned from the SPA fiasco? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord of Destruction Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 We'd be like "lol" and go talk to them, No one can hate Zenith.No, It isnt meant to be funny nor' cleaver. But instead of Diplomacy or Talking IRCly, You use missles. You got 900 members, Get some diplomats. We already basically fought a war against them once. We then let them go. We didn't destroy this alliance on sight even though it was a reroll alliance. We let them live. Even after granting amnesty for their previous actions, they plotted against us. There was no reason to even attempt diplomacy in this case. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beauty Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 Ok there is obviously no point in arguing with you you are just going to come up with lol 90k vs 21mil lololol.We are evil and we likey killing alliances. happy? Umm no. You must not reconigze an answer then. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ragashingo Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 Ok there is obviously no point in arguing with you you are just going to come up with lol 90k vs 21mil lololol.We are evil and we likey killing alliances. happy? I think you missed where I said: "Nah, the size doesn't matter. I've always been a proponent of not punishing an entire alliance for the actions of a few." Thats hardly: "lol 90k vs 21mil lololol" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord of Destruction Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 Nah, the size doesn't matter. I've always been a proponent of not punishing an entire alliance for the actions of a few. The members of the alliance are responsible for the actions of their leaders. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silentkiller Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 Umm no. You must not reconigze an answer then. and you must not recognise a valid CB then Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord of Destruction Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 I think you missed where I said: "Nah, the size doesn't matter. I've always been a proponent of not punishing an entire alliance for the actions of a few."Thats hardly: "lol 90k vs 21mil lololol" Raga, as you can see from the quote he placed in his response, silentkiller was speaking to Rotavele. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silentkiller Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 (edited) I think you missed where I said: "Nah, the size doesn't matter. I've always been a proponent of not punishing an entire alliance for the actions of a few."Thats hardly: "lol 90k vs 21mil lololol" this was aimed at roatvele not you. sorry for the confusion though. Edited March 1, 2009 by silentkiller Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beauty Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 and you must not recognise a valid CB then I do and yours isnt one of them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.