tyler kaiser Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 this is why I'm not joining a alliance until the end of the next major war. started playing right after the last big one going to continue playing until i hit #1 baby Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Uruk Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 put up a real war with atleast a DoW. I'm pretty sure that when you lose most of your aggressive war slots, it's a bit real. I can't really say anything about a DoW, but it certainly helped them out (assuming the majority of UN members check here) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AdamX Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 I havent been near 1500 NS for a long time, and I don't play TE much. Maybe they dont want to make a name, maybe they just want war. War is fun, and the peace of SE has gotten boring. On the rare ocasion I do play TE, I just raid random people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hayden colson Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 I havent been near 1500 NS for a long time, and I don't play TE much.Maybe they dont want to make a name, maybe they just want war. War is fun, and the peace of SE has gotten boring. On the rare ocasion I do play TE, I just raid random people. Why wouldnt they just want to wait until their nations are stronger and then attack so they may get more interest out of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AdamX Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 I don't have an answer for that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hayden colson Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 I don't have an answer for that. Let's leave that up to them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seth Muscarella Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 Let's leave that up to them. looks like it worked though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hayden colson Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 looks like it worked though. So far it has but in the end it will not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alexandros o Megas Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 So far it has but in the end it will not. I bet my money on SWAT !! Their experience and structure from SE makes them a standard ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
popsumpot Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 So far it has but in the end it will not. And you must not know how much work it takes to organize trades, build up to optimum strength and organise a newly formed alliance into an update blitz with a very satisfactory effect. Let's not take that away from SWAT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hayden colson Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 And you must not know how much work it takes to organize trades, build up to optimum strength and organise a newly formed alliance into an update blitz with a very satisfactory effect.Let's not take that away from SWAT. My nations was just recently destroyed. I was sent into anarchy and have lost 469 Attacking + 1,329 Defending = 1,798 Casualties in battle. This gives me every right do fight back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commander Benji Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 All stats taken at update. United Nations: --------------------- Total Nations: 78 (+7) Total Strength: 76,588 (+3,453) Average Nation Strength: 982 (-48) Nukes: 0 (No Change) Anarchy: 51 (+9) SWAT: --------------------- Total Nations: 55 (+2) Total Strength: 77,872 (+5,032) Average Nation Strength: 1,416 (+42) Nukes: 0 (No Change) Anarchy: 6 (+3) Analysis: --------------------- It appears neither side has made any significant gains, but SWAT still clearly holding the upper hand in terms of nation strength. With the larger of the two increases in total nations, it is suprising to see UN still unable to pull together any sort of effective blitz. If UN can get it together and sort out their larger member base, they should be able to do a bit of damage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingDingaLing Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 (edited) Here are stats from beginning of war until this last update. The SWAT stats are a little off on Total Strength cause I didnt catch that at the beginning United Nations: --------------------- Total Nations: 78 (+14) Total Strength: 76,588 (-1546) Average Nation Strength: 982 (-239) Nukes: 0 (No Change) Anarchy: 58 (+55) SWAT: --------------------- Total Nations: 55 (+6) Total Strength: 77,872 (+5,032) Average Nation Strength: 1,416 (+196) Nukes: 0 (No Change) Anarchy: 6 (+6) Edited March 1, 2009 by KingDingaLing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Uruk Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 Wow, this is turning out well for SWAT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hayden colson Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 I just have one question for them, why no DoW? I mean if they did this to MHA, RE, Fark, or any other alliance there would be an uproar. And there is no excuse for that's why they did it to us, because it wouldnt cause an uproar and fame would be brought to their name. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingDingaLing Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 (edited) I just have one question for them, why no DoW? I mean if they did this to MHA, RE, Fark, or any other alliance there would be an uproar. And there is no excuse for that's why they did it to us, because it wouldnt cause an uproar and fame would be brought to their name. Hayden Click Me for a DOW edit : fixed URL Edited March 1, 2009 by KingDingaLing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hayden colson Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 Hayden Click Me for a DOW That is not a DoW. It is a statement that they have put most of our nations in anarchy. To prove this, the attacks from SWAT have started way before that post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
popsumpot Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 My nations was just recently destroyed. I was sent into anarchy and have lost 469 Attacking + 1,329 Defending = 1,798 Casualties in battle. This gives me every right do fight back. Of course you do, I'm just saying there is no need to belittle what they did. Fight them back on the battlefield, not on propaganda. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commander Benji Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 I would have to agree on this one. Prove yourself on the battlefield, not in the forums. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts