Maelstrom Vortex Posted February 17, 2009 Report Share Posted February 17, 2009 (edited) If Peace Mode requires disarmament and absolutely no participation in global conflict.. hah.. I'm all for it. Not that I'd be in it. I wish to note. If you guys can only play the good times, and not the bad. You're powergamers and should get out of the RP. The world isn't always perfect. I'm not even hit, I'm rping it. Edited February 17, 2009 by Maelstrom Vortex Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaiser Martens Posted February 17, 2009 Report Share Posted February 17, 2009 Yes, then people can go on with their lives separately. Another idea would make it so that attacking someone requires OOC consensus first from both sides. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maelstrom Vortex Posted February 18, 2009 Report Share Posted February 18, 2009 I wish to note. If you guys can only play the good times, and not the bad. You're powergamers and should get out of the RP. The world isn't always perfect. I'm not even hit, I'm rping it. RE: Consensus: That'd make for much better story writing and much less whining. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaiser Martens Posted February 18, 2009 Report Share Posted February 18, 2009 I wish to note. If you guys can only play the good times, and not the bad. You're powergamers and should get out of the RP. The world isn't always perfect. I'm not even hit, I'm rping it.RE: Consensus: That'd make for much better story writing and much less whining. I agree about both things. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Botha Posted February 18, 2009 Report Share Posted February 18, 2009 We could always have a "Peace Mode" setting for CNRP. That's essentially what I am in due to my adherance to in-game relevance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MercyFallout Posted February 18, 2009 Report Share Posted February 18, 2009 Let's all remember the use of nuclear weapons in the south pacific on Sumer and in South America. All the people not involved in those rp's didn't rp nuclear winter even though there were a lot of nukes used in both those wars. The same should apply now. Yes. Because the mods wiped them and let you continue without learning your lessons. I'm sorry, but I'm pretty sure a lot of people here have agreed that you must accept the consequences of your role play. The world decided to go screw each over with nuclear missiles. I'm just telling you what you've done. A number of others have pulled up how much nuclear junk needs to be detonated to cause nuclear winter. Also, LVN. Congratulations. You learned how to misquote me. As with anyone else, you have the option of not following canon CNRP. Botha has opted to not follow the canon. You may do the same. However, the old rule still applies: Other people don't have to accept it. Triyun, if I wanted to keep the status quo of established roleplayers, then Martens would own Germany, I would own half of East Asia, this war would not have happened, and a number of other things. Try again with a more valid argument. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaiser Martens Posted February 18, 2009 Report Share Posted February 18, 2009 (edited) Either way it is already known that once things get bad enough a reset would happen. Also: How did Mercy dictate anything? I mean, he wasn't the one who launched nukes. lol. Edited February 18, 2009 by Kaiser Martens Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeVentNoir Posted February 18, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 18, 2009 Either way it is already known that once things get bad enough a reset would happen.Also: How did Mercy dictate anything? I mean, he wasn't the one who launched nukes. lol. First point, what and since when? Second point, mercy said that you shall RP nuclear winter or not be recognised as CN canon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maelstrom Vortex Posted February 18, 2009 Report Share Posted February 18, 2009 Hooray for the wisdom of Mercy who recognizes the importance of MAD doctrine and how it impacts an actual world environment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sargun II Posted February 18, 2009 Report Share Posted February 18, 2009 As I had nothing to do with this ruling (I had to go get a boot fitted over my leg for a football injury all day today), I'm just going to ask Triyun not to take things out of context. Also, Justinian, could you PM me about any of my "bullcrap" rulings? I'd like to know. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XRCatD Posted February 18, 2009 Report Share Posted February 18, 2009 Doomsday weapons have never actually been banned. However, it's possible to avoid the effect of doomsday weapons not directed at you, if you know how to RP it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Frost Posted February 18, 2009 Report Share Posted February 18, 2009 The GM doesn't have the rights to ban anyone from RP simply because the GM's don't like them or are refusing to go along with something they arn't apart of. It's that simple. Do people have to RP the effects of global nuclear catastrophe? yes, as this will surely go to non-involved people. But the GM's Do not have the power to remove people from RP (or the map). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sargun II Posted February 18, 2009 Report Share Posted February 18, 2009 (edited) The GM doesn't have the rights to ban anyone from RP simply because the GM's don't like them or are refusing to go along with something they arn't apart of. It's that simple. Do people have to RP the effects of global nuclear catastrophe? yes, as this will surely go to non-involved people. But the GM's Do not have the power to remove people from RP (or the map). 1. Yes, we do 2. The only way we can remove someone from the map is if they directly (and repeatedly) violate the rules, not because we "don't like them" Edited February 18, 2009 by Sargun Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Frost Posted February 18, 2009 Report Share Posted February 18, 2009 1. Yes, we do2. The only way we can remove someone from the map is if they directly (and repeatedly) violate the rules, not because we "don't like them" No you don't. It has been and always will be the Community's right to decide who is and isn't in RP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MercyFallout Posted February 18, 2009 Report Share Posted February 18, 2009 No you don't. It has been and always will be the Community's right to decide who is and isn't in RP Which is how Nikonov was removed for a month. Right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Frost Posted February 18, 2009 Report Share Posted February 18, 2009 Which is how Nikonov was removed for a month. Right? That was a Forum moderator decision to uphold that ruling, and one that was also (for the most part) community endorsed (I remember more the one person agreeing that Niko "needed a break") Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MercyFallout Posted February 18, 2009 Report Share Posted February 18, 2009 That was a Forum moderator decision to uphold that ruling, and one that was also (for the most part) community endorsed (I remember more the one person agreeing that Niko "needed a break") http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?s...t&p=1134927 Read the banned section. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sargun II Posted February 18, 2009 Report Share Posted February 18, 2009 That was a Forum moderator decision to uphold that ruling, and one that was also (for the most part) community endorsed (I remember more the one person agreeing that Niko "needed a break") I would say that repeatedly breaking community-made rules would be community support. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Frost Posted February 18, 2009 Report Share Posted February 18, 2009 http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?s...t&p=1134927Read the banned section. means nothing. Giving yourself a power just means you abuse your position. Huzzah! you help my case Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sargun II Posted February 18, 2009 Report Share Posted February 18, 2009 means nothing. Giving yourself a power just means you abuse your position. Huzzah! you help my case The mods gave us this power. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Frost Posted February 18, 2009 Report Share Posted February 18, 2009 The mods gave us this power. They upheld a ruling, not giving you a power. The mods made you GM's, not Forum moderators Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sargun II Posted February 18, 2009 Report Share Posted February 18, 2009 They upheld a ruling, not giving you a power. The mods made you GM's, not Forum moderators Stormcrow both upheld the ruling and gave us the power. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Frost Posted February 18, 2009 Report Share Posted February 18, 2009 Stormcrow both upheld the ruling and gave us the power. So you claim, but whether or not you want to pretend you have that right still won't change the fact that banning someone from RP and removing them from the map is a community decision Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sargun II Posted February 18, 2009 Report Share Posted February 18, 2009 So you claim, but whether or not you want to pretend you have that right still won't change the fact that banning someone from RP and removing them from the map is a community decision Let me give you a quote from a PM that I will gladly screenshot if you want me to. "Understood. Do what you think is best, just remember all map-bannings need to be referred through Mercy or me." That was before I was a GM, meaning I had to ask a mod or a GM about a map banning. As I am a GM that allows me to ban someone from the map. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comrade Posted February 18, 2009 Report Share Posted February 18, 2009 I agree that all wars should be an OOC agreed before the crap flies. Better stories, less confusion would result. Also, stating somewhere in the first post what allies, if any, could join would be good too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.