Agostinho Neto Posted February 17, 2009 Report Share Posted February 17, 2009 (edited) CN-RP R requires everyone to post their custom creates in fact books which are to be easy to find, and can be critiqued by everyone, rather than having to go back into the archives and look up these weapons. But why do it in CNRP-R, it could be done in CNRP easily. Edited February 17, 2009 by President Aliyev Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triyun Posted February 17, 2009 Report Share Posted February 17, 2009 But why do it in CNRP-R, it could be done in CNRP easily. Because I like multiple others become disillusioned with the way people are treated by the GMs in that game OOC based on whether their IC actions are on one side or not. I am also disillusioned with the excuse that if we didn't see it, its our fault for not objecting. I would rather create a new system that has a fresh start. I am tired of being treated like !@#$ in #cnrp because I am fighting a war that the GMs don't see eye to eye with us ICly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agostinho Neto Posted February 17, 2009 Report Share Posted February 17, 2009 Because I like multiple others become disillusioned with the way people are treated by the GMs in that game OOC based on whether their IC actions are on one side or not. I am also disillusioned with the excuse that if we didn't see it, its our fault for not objecting. I would rather create a new system that has a fresh start. I am tired of being treated like !@#$ in #cnrp because I am fighting a war that the GMs don't see eye to eye with us ICly. Well, i support CNRP-R because i would like to see its rules enforced in the standard CNRP just to experience some real-politik and people actually roleplaying things happening in their in-game country rather then rerolls and unrealistic situations (like roleplaying wars and not even considering damages in their countries, or nuking and not being sanctioned). So i like the rules of CNRP-R, sometimes being strict doesen't mean being unfair, but i would like to see CNRP improved with international organizations, international laws, something in the real world are the basic for international politics. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mastab Posted February 17, 2009 Report Share Posted February 17, 2009 While this may be agreeable, the mods have stated that they will not create a subforum for CNRP as it would be "sanctioning." No more so than stickying the CNRP threads. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JerreyRough Posted February 17, 2009 Report Share Posted February 17, 2009 Yes, CNRP-R should be default CNRP. It would be/is nice to just restart with a fresh world. I'd join it if I wasn't too busy with CNRPS and RL. I think there hasn't been international laws/international organizations because people are too busy to do the tasks for that kind of stuff, research, etc. A UN-ish organization was attempted to be made, but then shut down due to it being useless. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sargun II Posted February 17, 2009 Report Share Posted February 17, 2009 Because I like multiple others become disillusioned with the way people are treated by the GMs in that game OOC based on whether their IC actions are on one side or not. You're tired of someone speaking an opinion? I am also disillusioned with the excuse that if we didn't see it, its our fault for not objecting. I would rather create a new system that has a fresh start. That's always how it has been. People shouldn't need to be forced to make factbooks and other things. I am tired of being treated like !@#$ in #cnrp because I am fighting a war that the GMs don't see eye to eye with us ICly. I don't see why you need to !@#$%* and whine about the GMs, who haven't let OOC interact with their decisions. Even if I wasn't a GM I'd still be berating for you on it, no matter if I had ops or not or if I was a GM or even if I wasn't playing. It's an opinion, you don't have to listen to it. All I see about this is: "I'm tired of having someone criticise me" "let's flame the GMs" I don't disagree that this is a good step. However, the only differences between CNRP and CNRP® is: -you need a factbook -infra is a lot more underpowered than it should be -the tech scale is weird Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vasili Markov Posted February 17, 2009 Report Share Posted February 17, 2009 Because I like multiple others become disillusioned with the way people are treated by the GMs in that game OOC based on whether their IC actions are on one side or not. I am also disillusioned with the excuse that if we didn't see it, its our fault for not objecting. I would rather create a new system that has a fresh start. I am tired of being treated like !@#$ in #cnrp because I am fighting a war that the GMs don't see eye to eye with us ICly. I agree with this statement. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triyun Posted February 17, 2009 Report Share Posted February 17, 2009 I don't see why you need to !@#$%* and whine about the GMs, who haven't let OOC interact with their decisions. Even if I wasn't a GM I'd still be berating for you on it, no matter if I had ops or not or if I was a GM or even if I wasn't playing. It's an opinion, you don't have to listen to it. Your a GM, its your job to exercise self restraint and hold your tongue for appearing not bias. You instead are clearly on one side of every issue, and quite frankly NOT trustworthy to half the CN RP community. That is an issue. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agostinho Neto Posted February 17, 2009 Report Share Posted February 17, 2009 I don't disagree that this is a good step. However, the only differences between CNRP and CNRP® is:-you need a factbook -infra is a lot more underpowered than it should be -the tech scale is weird In my opinion, that's a fundamental part of the roleplay. Developing your country is not only invading and randomly declaring war, but actually roleplaying the society, of your country, the politicians, the people, not only military but economy and politics and social issues or internal problems. The fact book prevent people from saying "Hey, i had a super space ion barrier on my capital, you can't bomb me". If it's not in the factbook, it didn't happen, and the factbook makes a difference between roleplaying your ingame nation and roleplaying the randomness. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JerreyRough Posted February 17, 2009 Report Share Posted February 17, 2009 I could help/be a GM. I'm not putting down the existing ones, but I've always tried to be as "unbiased" as I can when I decide things (as long as it isn't the morning ). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
njndirish Posted February 17, 2009 Report Share Posted February 17, 2009 I lose the sports threads very easily, so some subforums would be helpful Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J Andres Posted February 19, 2009 Report Share Posted February 19, 2009 I think there should be a separate forum for the long established CNRP, which was the purpose that the forum was essentially created. There were other RP's quite a long time ago and they where forced to leave because they crowded the forums. Of course I think they also didnt base anything off CN stats at all so it wasn't really CNRP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XRCatD Posted February 21, 2009 Report Share Posted February 21, 2009 CNRP should not have its own subforums. Doing so will make unrecognition impossible, and those that want to unrecognize anything will be forced to debate it out with those that recognize it, and will end up with tons of OOC debating. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maelstrom Vortex Posted February 23, 2009 Report Share Posted February 23, 2009 In my opinion, that's a fundamental part of the roleplay. Developing your country is not only invading and randomly declaring war, but actually roleplaying the society, of your country, the politicians, the people, not only military but economy and politics and social issues or internal problems.The fact book prevent people from saying "Hey, i had a super space ion barrier on my capital, you can't bomb me". If it's not in the factbook, it didn't happen, and the factbook makes a difference between roleplaying your ingame nation and roleplaying the randomness. Sad part is we had detailed and fleshed out the formation of the Dragon Empire.. and it got ripped to shreds good with the bad. I miss the role-play around that immensely. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.