Maelstrom Vortex Posted March 2, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 2, 2009 (edited) New Rule: The WAR Code. This is non-negotiable. All wars in [AEGIS]/CNRPS must be negotiated and/or consented to before any posting. All wars must remain consensual throughout the duration of the conflict. The moment a war is objected to OOCly in a thread it ceases to exist and the nations automatically revert to peace with all conditions returned to a prewar status. Players seeking to participate in an on-going war must obtain the explicit consent of all currently involved players, in the case of civil wars this is the one person who operates the country. In the case of other wars it may be 2 or more depending on how the sides of the war have evolved. Violation of this policy can result in your suspension from canon. In the case of a suspension from Canon, something goes terribly wrong in your country and it explodes like Atlantis.. and you are removed from the face of Aegis as a smoking crater and must create a new nation to later rejoin. There is a 3 strikes rule. Do not make me get to 3. As of this time, all limitations on the use of WMD are restricted, but targets must also consent to have them being used upon them as part of the war rules. Also, the size limit on nations is also hereby lifted. Expand to fill the world. Edited March 2, 2009 by Maelstrom Vortex Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeVentNoir Posted March 2, 2009 Report Share Posted March 2, 2009 (edited) So magical peace mode is now enabled, where if I do not want to be war'd I just say no I don't consent? Then if you do say yes to the war, you can say no to their allies, and hence win what you should lose. Sounds like magical god mode. Edited March 2, 2009 by LeVentNoir Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sargun II Posted March 2, 2009 Report Share Posted March 2, 2009 The moment a war is objected to OOCly in a thread it ceases to exist and the nations automatically revert to peace with all conditions returned to a prewar status. What if there is an issue with the agreement and something was unclear? I would not immediately revert back to peace without the two (or more) sides trying to work a problem out. Of course, it isn't my rule. I'm just saying that if there is an unexpected issue that was not forseen during the initial planning, wouldn't it be good to allow the RP to continue after further hammering it out instead of making them do it again? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JerreyRough Posted March 2, 2009 Report Share Posted March 2, 2009 (edited) What if there is an issue with the agreement and something was unclear? I would not immediately revert back to peace without the two (or more) sides trying to work a problem out.Of course, it isn't my rule. I'm just saying that if there is an unexpected issue that was not forseen during the initial planning, wouldn't it be good to allow the RP to continue after further hammering it out instead of making them do it again? I think he means when theres "flak", not a "bullet". Edited March 2, 2009 by JerreyRough Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JerreyRough Posted March 2, 2009 Report Share Posted March 2, 2009 So magical peace mode is now enabled, where if I do not want to be war'd I just say no I don't consent?Then if you do say yes to the war, you can say no to their allies, and hence win what you should lose. Sounds like magical god mode. Its to be sure that OOC does not whiplash into IC (as it seems that too often in CNRP IC hatred is broguht into OOC hatred). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maelstrom Vortex Posted March 2, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 2, 2009 What if there is an issue with the agreement and something was unclear? I would not immediately revert back to peace without the two (or more) sides trying to work a problem out.Of course, it isn't my rule. I'm just saying that if there is an unexpected issue that was not forseen during the initial planning, wouldn't it be good to allow the RP to continue after further hammering it out instead of making them do it again? They would have the opportunity to work it out, they cannot, however.. work it out in the IC thread. They must work it out in other channels. This is to prevent the current messes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeVentNoir Posted March 2, 2009 Report Share Posted March 2, 2009 Its to be sure that OOC does not whiplash into IC (as it seems that too often in CNRP IC hatred is broguht into OOC hatred). Sounds like it lets people do what they want with no consequences. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maelstrom Vortex Posted March 2, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 2, 2009 (edited) The following amendement was applied: All disagreements about the progression of a war should be resolved in another channel of communication which is not the combat thread, the moment an OOC protest from the participating combatants enters the thread, the war halts. Edited March 2, 2009 by Maelstrom Vortex Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sargun II Posted March 2, 2009 Report Share Posted March 2, 2009 They would have the opportunity to work it out, they cannot, however.. work it out in the IC thread. They must work it out in other channels. This is to prevent the current messes. "The moment a war is objected to OOCly in a thread, the thread is stopped and any posts after the objection are null and void. Until a situation is worked out outside of the thread, it continues to be stopped. Once the situation is dealt with, the thread resumes." That would be better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maelstrom Vortex Posted March 2, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 2, 2009 (edited) Even better, thanks for the suggested errata. LVN: This is to enforce co-operative, versus adversarial RP, something I'm rather sure you're not accustomed to. The moment a war is objected to OOCly in a thread, the thread is stopped and any posts after the objection are null and void. Until a situation is worked out outside of the thread, it continues to be stopped. Once the situation is dealt with, the thread resumes. All disagreements about the progression of a war should be resolved in another channel of communication which is not the combat thread, the moment an OOC protest from the participating combatants enters the thread, the war is paused. If the situation is not resolved, the war is canceled and the errata to pre-war conditions will be applied. Attempting to resolve the issue in the combat thread will result in warnings and eventually suspension. Edited March 2, 2009 by Maelstrom Vortex Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
V The King Posted March 2, 2009 Report Share Posted March 2, 2009 Awesome new rules, Mael. They'll serve to make wars smoother, friendlier and less cluttered (OOCly speaking). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maelstrom Vortex Posted March 2, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 2, 2009 OOC: Yes, you could say they have been "inspired" by my test of CNRP's war system. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maelstrom Vortex Posted March 8, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 8, 2009 Rule 13 on the passage of time in CNRPS has been updated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JerreyRough Posted March 13, 2009 Report Share Posted March 13, 2009 Just made a history-thing for my "blog"/"book" (fanfiction chapters), which is directly based on Aegis. Link I can re-adapt parts of it for CNRPS (so then we have a foundation-history). I.e. the oil thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subtleknifewielder Posted March 13, 2009 Report Share Posted March 13, 2009 Hmm...OK. I think we should put in the war rules that a person has to have a good reason to object to a war once it's actualy started. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maelstrom Vortex Posted March 13, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 13, 2009 CNRPS has adopted a canon history. It will be added to the guide. You may thank Jerrey Rough for the contribution. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subtleknifewielder Posted March 13, 2009 Report Share Posted March 13, 2009 CNRPS has adopted a canon history. It will be added to the guide. You may thank Jerrey Rough for the contribution. One thing...if it started over lack of oil...how do we RP the oil resource? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JerreyRough Posted March 13, 2009 Report Share Posted March 13, 2009 One thing...if it started over lack of oil...how do we RP the oil resource? He he....GO ON IRC! It has been a long time since 2023...and oil does come long dead plants/animals. Figure it out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maelstrom Vortex Posted March 13, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 13, 2009 The biomass of humanity and what was left over.. after many hundreds of thousands of years.. has been re-processed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JerreyRough Posted March 13, 2009 Report Share Posted March 13, 2009 (edited) UPDATE! (for the oil crisis in Aegis) -In this new age, oil is more scarce; or at least it seems so. Oil, instead of being like modern day in large reservoirs, it is much more spaced out & located in populated areas. edit: I can change to being in large, single amounts. Just made it "spaced" out in blog due to humans and plants all over the earth suddenly dieing. edit 2: What Mael said sum's it up. Edited March 13, 2009 by JerreyRough Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subtleknifewielder Posted March 13, 2009 Report Share Posted March 13, 2009 He he....GO ON IRC!It has been a long time since 2023...and oil does come long dead plants/animals. Figure it out. Not that quickly? The biomass of humanity and what was left over.. after many hundreds of thousands of years.. has been re-processed. Uh huh...whatever, I suppose that'll work. However, I still say if we go with this, it means Oil is a little more scarce in Aegis. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JerreyRough Posted March 14, 2009 Report Share Posted March 14, 2009 If people want to "Rock the Vote!" (rtv), then post & I can make a duplicate history that is less detailed but satisfies your oil "issue". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maelstrom Vortex Posted March 14, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 14, 2009 (edited) Not that quickly?Uh huh...whatever, I suppose that'll work. However, I still say if we go with this, it means Oil is a little more scarce in Aegis. I think Rare oil would make the world more interesting so I wouldn't mind. Right now the jet fuels used by the Storm Dragons is formed from liquified coal and natural gas. Edited March 14, 2009 by Maelstrom Vortex Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subtleknifewielder Posted March 14, 2009 Report Share Posted March 14, 2009 And what of my suggestion for the war rules...that you have to have a good reason for refusing to continue a war that has already started? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maelstrom Vortex Posted March 15, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 Sounds very good and shall be implemented. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.