Jump to content

Treaty compendium


Bob Janova

Recommended Posts

11) New Polar Order

Colour: Blue

NS: 7.8M

NpO-NPO MDoAP: MDoAP with NPO; total NS 29.4M, tension 1043 (134 per M NS)

NpO-RoK MDoAP: MDoAP with RoK; total NS 16.1M, tension 241 (31 per M NS)

Valhalla-NpO MDoAP: MDoAP with Valhalla; total NS 12.9M, tension 340 (43 per M NS)

The Bi-Polar Accords: MDoAP with GR; total NS 12.4M, tension 138 (17 per M NS)

NV-NpO MDoAP: MDoAP with NV; total NS 11.9M, tension 112 (14 per M NS)

Permafrost: MDP with STA; total NS 9.8M, tension 101 (13 per M NS)

Brrds and Lions can be best of friends: MDoAP with Genesis; total NS 9.4M, tension 7 (0 per M NS)

ARES-Genesis MDoAP: MDoAP with ARES; total NS 9.1M, tension 39 (5 per M NS)

don't think the last treaty is right....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 621
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The inherent flaw of CN. Looking at this makes you realize that just about everyone that counts is treatied to everybody else in one way or the other. In the real word, you wouldn't treaty yourself with someone who has a treaty with an enemy of yours, but this is Bob. The web is so complicated now that it's almost mute to even have one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey Bob Janova, reading the above post got me thinking that even though World Politics of Bob don't quite run by the same rules as rl, there still must exist fault lines where conflict could cause seismic shifts in the political landscape . Where do you or others think that they lie? Does your tension paradigm hint at where those are and if so could you elaborate? Anyway, if you take the time to answer this than thank you in advance!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't want to start putting my subjective interpretations on the web. Everything that is displayed in the OP is the objective result of running a physical model, and if it doesn't show any clear divisions (which it doesn't imo) then perhaps there aren't any. If you think the treaty tension has a deep meaning that will show you how the cookie will crumble, then feel free to interpret it as such.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't want to start putting my subjective interpretations on the web. Everything that is displayed in the OP is the objective result of running a physical model, and if it doesn't show any clear divisions (which it doesn't imo) then perhaps there aren't any. If you think the treaty tension has a deep meaning that will show you how the cookie will crumble, then feel free to interpret it as such.

Well, alrighty then, I can appreciate that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Full update.

TSO make a dramatic entry to the web at no. 56, and CCC stave off their removal by re-entering the top 80. Making way for these two are Blackwater and ARES, the latter of which dropped an astonishing 13 places in the rankings table. Both alliances will be removed next week unless I get a signal not to do so by membership (who will take on the responsibility of maintaining their data).

UBD and Nebula-X are removed from the web as mentioned at the last update, having not re-entered the top 80.

Biggest Winner: Vanguard, Dark Templar and CCC, all â–˛4

Biggest Loser ARES, â–Ľ13

All movement:

NpO: Up 1

Grä: Down 1

Valhalla: Up 1

DE: Down 1

GDA, GR: Up 1

UPN: Down 2

MK: Up 2

Ech, Legion: Down 1

NV, MA, WTF: Up 1

LoSS: Down 3

RIA: Up 2

(Umb: 0)

Invicta: Down 2

TORN: Up 1

TCB: Down 1

Vanguard: Up 4

(WAPA: 0)

FEAR: Down 2

CON: Down 1

STA: Up 3

OG: Down 2

CD, GATO: Down 1

TSO: New entry

Orion: Down 1

Athens: Up 2

(TGE: 0)

GLoF: Down 2

OTF: Up 2

(ML: 0)

FCO: Down 2

USN: Down 9

Genesis: Down 2

AO: Down 2

BAPS: Down 1

DT: Up 4

(MOON: 0)

DF: Up 1

SSSW18: Down 1

CCC: Up 4

(Immortals: 0)

Argent: Up 1

Wolfpack: Down 1

------ (80th place)

Blackwater: Down 9

ARES: Down 13

=WE=: Down 3

OV: Down 1

Edit: In case you're confused, entry to the web (and the rankings on this post) are determined by score. However, the alliances are ranked by NS in the OP.

Edited by Bob Janova
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Full update.

As mentioned last week, Blackwater and ARES have been removed from the web.

An honourable mention to the NSO who I'm sure will be making an appearance next week! Congratulations also to Sparta on their third place, and TSO for solidifying their position.

Biggest Winner: RDD (â–˛7)

Biggest Loser: TGE (â–Ľ6)

All movers:

+1 Sparta

-1 MCXA

+3 UPN

+1 GR

-2 DE

-2 GDA

+2 WTF

(0 MA)

-2 NV

+1 M*A*S*H

-1 LoSS

+2 Umbrella

-1 NADC

-1 RIA

+1 TCB

+1 NEW

-2 TORN

+2 STA

-1 FEAR

+4 TSO

-2 CON

(0 CD)

-2 OG

-1 GATO

+2 Zenith

+7 RDD

-1 GLoF

(0 OTF)

+1 FCO

-1 ML

-6 TGE

(0 USN)

-2 VA

+1 GUN

-1 BAPS

+2 CCC

(0 SSSW18)

+1 Immortals

-3 Dark Fist

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the support :)

Full update today

As predicted, NSO jumped into the fray, pushing out Wolfpack who will no longer be maintained – but I think one of you guys is keeping your treaties up to date anyway, so you will join =WE= and OV on the self-maintained list.

UPN had a bad week, and Carpe Diem deserve a mention for their 9 place gain – sorry about Ivan eclipsing you <_<. Jarheads also get a mention for reaching 82nd place, only two away from a web appearance, despite being at war with most of CN.

Treaty tensions will all be higher this week because I updated the software and as a result I had to increase the repulsive force factor in order to see what was going on.

Biggest Winner: â–˛30 (roughly) New Sith Order

Biggest Loser: â–Ľ6 United Purple Nations

Edit: Also, added a picture to the OP. Because everyone likes a good picture. The core of the web, labelled up with some politically important and/or graphically obvious groupings. The labelling is obviously subjective and my own opinion but I think it is useful nonetheless. Blocs are displayed strongly, bilateral treaties are suppressed (otherwise you just see a sea of lines).

web20090314-labelled.png

All movers:

â–˛1 MHA

â–Ľ1 MCXA

â–˛1 NpO

â–Ľ1 RoK

â–˛1 TDO

â–Ľ1 GPA

â–˛1 GR, DE, GDA

â–˛3 Legion

(0 MK, Ech)

â–Ľ6 UPN

â–˛1 NATO

â–Ľ1 Int

â–˛1 PC

â–Ľ1 TTK

â–˛9 CD

â–Ľ1 TCB, NEW

â–˛1 WAPA

â–Ľ1 Van

â–Ľ3 TORN

â–˛1 TSO

â–Ľ2 STA, FEAR

â–Ľ1 CON

â–˛1 GATO

â–Ľ1 OG

â–˛30 NSO

â–Ľ1 Orion, Athens

â–˛4 ML

â–Ľ2 Zenith, RDD

â–˛2 TGE

â–Ľ1 FCO

â–Ľ4 GLoF, OTF

â–Ľ1 USN,VA,Genesis,UCN,AO

(0 BAPS)

â–Ľ2 GUN

â–Ľ1 DT,MOON,CCC,SSSW18,Immortals

(0 Argent)

â–Ľ2 DF

â–Ľ1 WP

Edited by Bob Janova
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bob, one worry I have... How long does it take to update? Alliances should be updating the stats and treaties themselves, on the wiki, and you should just be copy-pasting that information from time to time. Otherwise, you will grow tired of this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The NS update takes around half an hour usually, because I have to re-order the treaty and alliance lists. It can be 5 minutes if no-one moves, or an hour if lots of people do. If I get bored though I can just not do that for a while :P. Anyone who has the will to help can do an NS update: you just need to copy the in game tables and reorder the alliance and treaty lists appropriately.

Creating the compendium takes about a minute because the program does it for me; I just need to run it for long enough for the model to settle to equilibrium. It is helpful if people keep their own treaties updated, not because it takes time for me to do it (I read the AA forum most days anyway) but because I am likely to miss some treaty announcements.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

recently got the updated application and i have to say the black background is good. its still a mess thought. any chance you can make it not display redundant treaties? or do i have to remove those on my own?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...